Jump to content

Thailand: Pita’s loss is Thaksin’s gain


webfact

Recommended Posts

Pita loses PM bid, second round of voting to take place next week

By Peter Roche

 

image.png


The leader of the political party that won the most votes in Thailand’s May 14 general election has failed in his bid to become prime minister after a full day of debate in the Thai parliament yesterday.

 

Move Forward leader Pita Limjaroenrat failed to secure the necessary number of votes from opposition parties or senators appointed by the junta after the 2017 Charter was promulgated.

 

Voting for the country’s next PM kicked off around 4pm yesterday, July 13, with Pita the sole candidate. Nation Thailand reports that voting was carried out openly and the results tallied by a committee of 6 MPs. Voting continued for 2 hours, at which point Parliament conclude that Pita had not secured enough votes to become PM.

 

Full story: https://phuket-go.com/phuket-news/national-news/pita-loses-pm-bid-second-round-of-voting-to-take-place-next-week/

 

Phuket Go

-- © Copyright Phuket GO 2023-07-14
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, webfact said:

Pita loses PM bid, second round of voting to take place next week

By Peter Roche

 

image.png


The leader of the political party that won the most votes in Thailand’s May 14 general election has failed in his bid to become prime minister after a full day of debate in the Thai parliament yesterday.

 

Move Forward leader Pita Limjaroenrat failed to secure the necessary number of votes from opposition parties or senators appointed by the junta after the 2017 Charter was promulgated.

 

Voting for the country’s next PM kicked off around 4pm yesterday, July 13, with Pita the sole candidate. Nation Thailand reports that voting was carried out openly and the results tallied by a committee of 6 MPs. Voting continued for 2 hours, at which point Parliament conclude that Pita had not secured enough votes to become PM.

 

Full story: https://phuket-go.com/phuket-news/national-news/pita-loses-pm-bid-second-round-of-voting-to-take-place-next-week/

 

Phuket Go

-- © Copyright Phuket GO 2023-07-14
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

don't know why the outcome should be different....there are so many votes missing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr Meeseeks said:

They say people get the government they deserve, and by voting Palang Pracharath at the last election and voting in favour of the last constitution, they've only got themselves to blame for the current situation.

Blame? 72% did not vote for MFP so these 72% won't be sad.....

  • Confused 6
  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pita fails to secure required support to become PM
by Krajangwit Johjit

 

image.jpeg


Move Forward Party leader Pita Limjaroenrat has said he remains determined to pursue his bid for the prime minister’s position despite losing in a parliamentary vote. Although Pita fell short of the required threshold by 51 votes, he expressed his party’s intention to re-strategize and gather the necessary support for the next vote, scheduled for next week.

 

Pita, who was unopposed, failed to secure the required support from the 749-member bicameral legislature. Numerous abstentions and votes against him resulted in his falling short of the necessary 375 votes to form a government. Pita’s eight-party alliance currently controls 312 seats in the lower house.

 

Pita won 323 votes in the parliamentary vote, including support from 13 senators out of the 249-member conservative-leaning upper house. 182 legislators voted against him, while 198 abstained.

 

Many senators hold opposition to Move Forward’s anti-establishment agenda, which includes plans to amend a law prohibiting insults against the monarchy and to diminish the military’s role in politics.

 

Despite the setback, Pita expressed his determination and refusal to give up, emphasizing his commitment to gathering more support during this time.

 

The reconvening of legislators next week presents the possibility of a new vote, with indications suggesting that Pita’s name may be resubmitted unless he is disqualified.

 

Source: https://thainews.prd.go.th/en/news/detail/TCATG230714095151526

 

nnt.jpg
-- © Copyright NNT 2023-07-14
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, h90 said:

don't know why the outcome should be different....there are so many votes missing

Well, if legal issues are "resolved" I think many of the senators will lose cover to abstain.  A big part of me thinks that the government might get a clue-stick and realize the potential for serious long-term impact if the popular vote is ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tjo o tjim said:

Well, if legal issues are "resolved" I think many of the senators will lose cover to abstain.  A big part of me thinks that the government might get a clue-stick and realize the potential for serious long-term impact if the popular vote is ignored.

They won't be resolved, but they could nominate some PTP person. That would be more agreeable....PTP may even get BJ on board.

But if they have BJ there is not much missing and they could drop MFP...would need votes from either the Dems or the military which would be a hard sell...or they buy out some of the MFP.

A lot people believe Anutin get PM....I can't see the logic behind that but it seems many believe it.

  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stoner said:

anyone who didn't vote or was absent yesterday (without an iron clad reason like imminent death or being held captive by insurgents)  should be automatically fired from their position. 

 

the number needed should be dropped to reflect those that refused and a new total needed. 

 

simple.

:cheesy:firing MPs that don't vote what you want? Democracy North Korea style......

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, webfact said:

The reconvening of legislators next week presents the possibility of a new vote, with indications suggesting that Pita’s name may be resubmitted unless he is disqualified.

I think Pita candidancy for PM will be re-submitted for the next voting session unless the Charter Court make 2 big annoucements before 19 July. If the Court announced that they will accept the case forwarded by EC on the iTV shares and also accept EC recommendation to strip his MP status, it will weakened his votes. It can lead to prison time and party dissolution. The other announcement will be detrimental for his own personal safety as the court has accepted a compliant filed by a lawyer against Pita for his plans to reform 112. This is 112 case will be a major obstacle as the senators used this effectively in yesterday debate and had major influence on the senates and opposition MPs voting decisions.

 

Although Pita can still run for Prime Minister, the overhang legal jeopardies may influence the coalition to make decision to nominate an alternate which is most likely K Sretha seen as a more moderate candidate. There are backroom deals for BJT and PPRP to vote for him. 

 

I don't think the pro-democracy coalition will break off. Just too much to lose for PTP to join with the junta parties. A coalition with the junta is a big betrayal for the Red Shirts stalwarts who fought for them and also a big letdown for the young pro democracy voters who will be the major voting block in 4 years. Better heads will rule within the coalition and especially with MFP who will still take a good portion of the ministerial positions while bidding their time to re-organize for the next election. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, stoner said:

they didn't vote. their job yesterday was to vote for the candidate presented. they with held their vote. they didn't preform the duty they were there for. 

 

where did i mention it was what i wanted ? 

 

fired. 

 

 

Please read a bit how parliaments work.....

  • Confused 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...