Why hasn't or doesn't the US go after Putin and Kim Jong and exterminate them as soon as possible.

Why not give Ukraine every available long range missile, fighter jet, cluster bomb, attack helicopters, and anything else to attack Russian hard and decisive ?

It seems the US are deliberately letting Russia hold ground on the front line and keep the war going ?

 

I'm not sure what the US is trying to achieve but if I poured billions of $$ into this war I'd want it over asap ......   ?   it's really getting strange that the US & NATO let it drag on ....

 

 

 

It's a terrorist attack because they are "civil leaders", not military leaders, the same way Zelensky is still alive today.

11 minutes ago, steven100 said:

Why hasn't or doesn't the US go after Putin and Kim Jong and exterminate them as soon as possible.

Why not give Ukraine every available long range missile, fighter jet, cluster bomb, attack helicopters, and anything else to attack Russian hard and decisive ?

It seems the US are deliberately letting Russia hold ground on the front line and keep the war going ?

 

I'm not sure what the US is trying to achieve but if I poured billions of $$ into this war I'd want it over asap ......   ?   it's really getting strange that the US & NATO let it drag on ....

 

 

 

Are you suggesting extrajudicial murder of two different countries leaders.

 

That in itself is also criminal.

2 minutes ago, freeworld said:

Are you suggesting extrajudicial murder of two different countries leaders.

 

That in itself is also criminal.

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

one prediction i came across.

russia will lose the war.

putin regime will be replaced by a pro-USA regime

russia will become part of EU.

is it bs? 

 

Putin is doing a pretty good job of destroying Russia's ability to fight any future wars.  The U.S. needs a problematic 김정은/N. Korea so it can keep a military presence on the Asian continent. 

Just now, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

 

Yes, it was a crime but you have been indoctrinated thinking otherwise.

 

Also, to the mad brute's (USA) defense, both of them were also leaders of their army, so they were actually also military targets.

What's up with you losers advocating for the murder of others.

 

The United states can't just eliminate whoever it wants.

 

If you feel so strongly about Ukraine winning the war and what more the west should be giving to them, go pick up a rifle and book a one way ticket there.

5 minutes ago, freeworld said:

Are you suggesting extrajudicial murder of two different countries leaders.

 

That in itself is also criminal.

Not to mention that others (deputies, military, etc.) might react with nuclear strikes. (Quite plausible in the case of Kim's sister.)

Just now, save the frogs said:

one prediction i came across.

russia will lose the war.

putin regime will be replaced by a pro-USA regime

russia will become part of EU.

is it bs? 

 

I don't know, seems unlikely. I doubt Russia will lose.

6 minutes ago, BarstoolChang said:

What's up with you losers advocating for the murder of others.

 

The United states can't just eliminate whoever it wants.

To be fair, the CIA was involved in a few in the 1960s and 70s, but that was in cooperation with domestic forces, e.g. the local military. But this is the 21st century, and Russia and North Korea are not impoverished African or South American countries.

6 minutes ago, BarstoolChang said:

What's up with you losers advocating for the murder of others.

 

The United states can't just eliminate whoever it wants.

 

If you feel so strongly about Ukraine winning the war and what more the west should be giving to them, go pick up a rifle and book a one way ticket there.

that's not what I asked or said .....     but hey'   keep posting your indepth knowledge on what others are thinking

The answer is obvious...because they don't want to start a nuclear war.

No, nobody else is confused by this. Only you.

"Is anyone else as confused as me as to why the US hasn't seized the opportunity to eliminate Putin & Kim Jong un at the same time"

 

No.

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"Is anyone else as confused as me as to why the US hasn't seized the opportunity to eliminate Putin & Kim Jong un at the same time"

 

No.

why wouldn't it make sense to get rid of them ...  the war would cease tomorrow imo.

 

44 minutes ago, steven100 said:

48 minutes ago, freeworld said:

Are you suggesting extrajudicial murder of two different countries leaders.

 

That in itself is also criminal.

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

It is massively different.  Saddam was not "eliminated" by the US, neither was Gaddafi.

 

Because sometimes the "crazy" waiting in the wings is worse than the "crazy" on stage.

 

You can't do things like that because matters will escalate and the Russians will do to the Americans what they did to them., kinda tit-for-tat offensive.

Why stop at two.

 

Exterminate the heads of state of every non pro-US government. 

1 hour ago, steven100 said:

nonsense ... how is that any different from Saddam Hussian or Gadaffi or any other tyrant.

 

Nonsense, what gives the US the right to kill other countries leaders. We all know about the invasion of Iraq and the farcical buildup by the US to carry it out.

 

Extract from wikipedia (In 2003, the United States and its allies invaded Iraq, falsely accusing Saddam of developing weapons of mass destruction and of having ties with al-Qaeda) In any event after Sadam Hussein was captured there was an Iraqi court process.

 

Gaddafi was  dealt with by the ICC and by Nato supporting the rebels and enforcing a no fly zone and shelling Gaddafi's security forces (so much for the defensive organisation of only NATO members) Eventually Gaddafi was captured and met his extrajudicial demise probably at the hands of his own nationals.

 

Basically what can be observed is nuclear weapons are keeping the US and NATO at bay from getting directly involved.

45 minutes ago, Furioso said:

The U.S. needs a problematic 김정은/N. Korea so it can keep a military presence on the Asian continent. 

The US doesn't need an excuse such as N. Korea to maintain a presence in Asia.

48 minutes ago, SuperSaiyan said:

Yes, it was a crime but you have been indoctrinated thinking otherwise.

So have you!  The US did not "eliminate" Saddam by assassination, as the OP was implying should happen, nor Gaddafi.

50 minutes ago, SuperSaiyan said:

Yes, it was a crime

How was Saddam's execution a crime?

1 hour ago, steven100 said:

Why hasn't or doesn't the US go after Putin and Kim Jong and exterminate them as soon as possible.

For one, it’s an act of war. Are you really aching for a global nuclear event?

19 minutes ago, steven100 said:

why wouldn't it make sense to get rid of them ...  the war would cease tomorrow imo.

Duh.

14 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

How was Saddam's execution a crime?

Weapons of mass destruction, anyone?

 

Can we have a trial of Bush and cohort? Death penalty for them sounds fair for creating mass suffering of the Iraqi population.

17 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

So have you!  The US did not "eliminate" Saddam by assassination, as the OP was implying should happen, nor Gaddafi.

You're denying history. Please educate yourself... wait, nevermind!

1 minute ago, SuperSaiyan said:

You're denying history. Please educate yourself... wait, nevermind!

Please educate yourself... wait, nevermind!   

Saddam was executed after a trial, Gaddafi was killed, probably, by his own countrymen.

1 hour ago, save the frogs said:

one prediction i came across.

russia will lose the war.

putin regime will be replaced by a pro-USA regime

russia will become part of EU.

is it bs? 

 

Hopefully Russia will lose but that's not certain and it could take a long time.

The rest is silly.