Jump to content

Fertility crisis set to halve Thailand’s population in six decades


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg

 

Thailand’s population is predicted to plummet by half over the ensuing six decades due to a mounting fertility crisis. This alarming situation has spurred the Ministry of Public Health to instigate measures to encourage pregnancy and subsequently manage the drastic demographic shift that the country is poised to face.

 

The Public Health Minister, Cholnan Srikaew, highlighted yesterday, October 30 that every province in Thailand is susceptible to the repercussions of this demographic alteration. Currently, the fertility rate for Thai women stands at an average of 1.16, indicating that a woman has approximately 1.16 children throughout her lifetime. An exception to this trend is observed in Yala province, which reports a fertility rate of 2.27.

 

The declining fertility rate was first observed in 1993, with a recorded rate of 2.1. This decline coincides with a decrease in the number of births. In the span from 1963 to 1983, the average annual births were around one million. However, in 2021, the total number of newborns was a mere 485,085, remarkably lower than the annual death toll of 550,042.


Cholnan attributed the primary causes of this decline to economic, social, educational, and environmental issues, with health problems accounting for a mere 10%.

 

by Mitch Connor

Picture courtesy of @memphasys.

 

Full story: The Thaiger 2023-10-31

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, webfact said:

However, in 2021, the total number of newborns was a mere 485,085, remarkably lower than the annual death toll of 550,042.

 

So will the difference between births and deaths be 30 million in 6 years?

To my arithmetic, 550042 - 485085 = 64957, which would take 46 years, or even less if the kids don't do more conceiving.

Edited by KannikaP
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

So will the difference between births and deaths be 30 million in 6 years?

To my arithmetic, 550042 - 485085 = 64957, which would take 46 years, or even less if the kids don't do more conceiving.

6 Decades.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 2baht said:

So, the "men " have no lead in their pencil??? 🤔

maybe they are shooting blanks  555

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KannikaP said:

So will the difference between births and deaths be 30 million in 6 years?

To my arithmetic, 550042 - 485085 = 64957, which would take 46 years, or even less if the kids don't do more conceiving.

Doesn’t work like that. In the interim the birth rate will continue to fall—it’s not linear—while the populace continues to age. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, KannikaP said:

So will the difference between births and deaths be 30 million in 6 years?

To my arithmetic, 550042 - 485085 = 64957, which would take 46 years, or even less if the kids don't do more conceiving.

It did say six decades

  • Haha 1
Posted

It was not so long ago that we were being told that overpopulation was a problem. We were also told that micro revolution would lead to mass unemployment the same goes for AI. The world keeps on chugging along, luddites or no luddites.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Dionigi said:

It was not so long ago that we were being told that overpopulation was a problem.

The difficulty is that - as China's example shows - demographics are a long-term item where relatively small 'tweeks' of the birthrate above and below 2.1 produce slowly gathering & eventually huge changes in outcomes. Over decades.

 

So, as China shows, even an authoritarian regime with maximum social, cultural and economic control has little capability to change the demographic outcomes once a trend has been set in motion.

 

The beauty of demographics is that, for the State and its bureaucracy, very long-term predictions are possible. For instance, the number of baby boys born in cities this year produces useful estimates on crime rates 20 years down the track ...

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

How I love the 'facts of stats'  1.16 children '...indicating that a woman has approximately 1.16 children throughout her lifetime' The math stats may be useful when looking at area hospital costs etc. but here it would be  better written as '...has on average 1 child in her lifetime'.

Posted

"Currently, the fertility rate for Thai women stands at an average of 1.16, indicating that a woman has approximately 1.16 children throughout her lifetime. An exception to this trend is observed in Yala province, which reports a fertility rate of 2.27."

 

No, I am not a 'racist', just a scientifically factual guy...as they do tend to double the indigenous Thai's'.

 

Wikipedia:

Yala is one of the four provinces of Thailand with a Muslim majority. About 72 percent of the people are Malay-speaking Muslims 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, tkramer said:

as they do tend to double the indigenous Thai's'.

The people of Yala are equally indigenous, they haven't moved, the border did.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...