Jump to content

PM2.5 crisis first major test for Srettha’s government


webfact

Recommended Posts

image.jpeg

 

The air pollution crisis in Thailand, specifically the hazardous PM2.5 particles, presents a formidable challenge to new Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin and his cabinet. This issue transcends mere environmental concerns, morphing into a litmus test for the government’s commitment to public health and its willingness to confront entrenched industrial and agricultural interests.

 

PM2.5 particles are fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter. These particles are so small that they can penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, posing serious health risks. Chronic exposure to PM2.5 is linked to a range of severe health issues, including respiratory diseases, heart conditions, early deaths, and cancer. In Thailand, the PM2.5 crisis is particularly acute during the winter months, exacerbated by crop burning practices and industrial emissions.

 

The previous administration under Prayut Chan-ocha demonstrated a reluctance to address this issue head-on, especially in the lead-up to the elections. There was a palpable lack of political will to take measures that might upset key economic sectors. The agricultural practices, such as crop burning, were left largely unchecked.

 

Similarly, the manufacturing sector, a cornerstone of Thailand’s economic growth, continued to contribute to the pollution without facing stringent regulatory pushback. This approach, arguably, was governed by the electoral calculus rather than a commitment to public health and environmental stewardship.

 

By Arun Saronchai

 

Full story: THAI ENQUIRER 2023-12-13

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time goes fast,every year another crack down for a week or two and it is all better!

Clear skies all the way boys!

They have all year every year to work on this but no,just wait until it becomes unbearable

and keep the kids home from school.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

They could make a huge difference locally by enforcing laws pertaining to crop burning and vehicle emissions.

 

image.png.a88c542854f5140d8eac2322c69ed5bd.png 

 

image.png.d28ddacf8a716984f889bea5528c053d.png

 

Indeed.  But it has never happened in the past, and I doubt the new PM will even try.  Once the air clears, which it will, life goes on.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Enzian said:

This is getting insane. Three weeks ago I ended up in ER in the middle of the night because a bacterial infection, till then unknown, centered in the lower part of my right lung reached a tipping point and I didn't know if I would make it to morning. When I recovered I booked a flight out, but not until the beginning of Feb.; now the pollution season is kicking in early and my plan to stay through the "cool" season and leave for 3 or 4 months in the "spring" season doesn't seem comprehensive at all. What sense does it make to live in this? The AQI index for Bangkok this morning is 165.

See you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, HaoleBoy said:

"Miraculously solve" this problem?   

Go after the big aggribusinesses and fine them!  Thailand big aggri companies are producing a very large portion of this problem in Thailand and Myanmar.

     www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/tangled-problem-sugarcane-burning-thailand

This junta 2.0 gov is again scared to go after some big elite families.

 

True.  I wonder if a Future Forward PM would be any different?  One would hope so.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

The air pollution crisis in Thailand, specifically the hazardous PM2.5 particles, presents a formidable challenge to new Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin and his cabinet. This issue transcends mere environmental concerns, morphing into a litmus test for the government’s commitment to public health and its willingness to confront entrenched industrial and agricultural interests.

The Bangkok governor has done sod-all since he took office, maybe Srettha could call him back in for an update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GarryP said:

Warn tourists to stay away from Thailand due to the terrible air.

That would be a fastback to criminal defamation and,  depending on how the message is delivered, violation of the Computer Act. Such is the state of Freedom of Speech in Thailand - another challenging test.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, webfact said:

The air pollution crisis in Thailand, specifically the hazardous PM2.5 particles, presents a formidable challenge to new Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin and his cabinet.

 

How so? He'll just do nothing about it, just like all the other PMs before him.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly there is a cluster of high readings in the north CM area now but nothing across border in Laos or Myanmar 

not being in area myself what do you locals think is current source - forest fires, cane burning ? Of course it coincides with the rapid drying up period end of wet season

 

One of the advantages of being in what I call the Far East (Ubon Ratchathani) is the generally good AQ until it gets really dry hot into March April

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am always amazed at the magazine and internet articles that always put Thailand in the top 10 of retirement destinations.

3-4 months a year it is un livable.. 

How do you rate a country that kills countless thousands yearly with polluted air, especially young and old as a retirement destination.. 

Usually if you are retiring you are considered old... which in that case Thailand would be one of the last places you would want to be.

 

Edited by Gknrd
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gknrd said:

I am always amazed at the magazine and internet articles that always put Thailand in the top 10 of retirement destinations.

3-4 months a year it is un livable.. 

How do you rate a country that kills countless thousands yearly with polluted air, especially young and old as a retirement destination.. 

Usually if you are retiring you are considered old... which in that case Thailand would be one of the last places you would want to be.

 

 

"Amazing Thailand" indeed.  If the pollution doesn't get you, the unhealthy food and appalling driving is likely to!  Maybe, it's just worth the risk for many.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, UbonEagle said:

One of the advantages of being in what I call the Far East (Ubon Ratchathani) is the generally good AQ until it gets really dry hot into March April

 

ubon ratchathani experiences relatively good or acceptable air quality for approximately six months.

 

the air quality in the far east might be somewhat better than in the north, but it remains far from being

consistently good throughout most of the year ...

 

20231214.thumb.png.359d292ce77104987f657ad52dfcbc40.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...