Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

I read that the new law regarding lease contracts (a few years ago already) only applies for landlords having 5 or more properties they rent out.. Is it so or does it apply also to other landlords ? Is there a precise law regarding the lease contracts (receipts to issue, payments to do and possibility of breaching the contract for lack of maintenance or the landlord) ?

When having a contract which doesn't have a breach procedure, how is it possible to handle this ? (the above law says the contract can be resumed with 1 month notification)

if going to court will the fact that the property is in bad state, with frequent problems and partly not usable (bathtub etc..) be taken into account ?

Thank you very much

Posted
49 minutes ago, domdom said:

Hello

I read that the new law regarding lease contracts (a few years ago already) only applies for landlords having 5 or more properties they rent out.. Is it so or does it apply also to other landlords ? Is there a precise law regarding the lease contracts (receipts to issue, payments to do and possibility of breaching the contract for lack of maintenance or the landlord) ?

When having a contract which doesn't have a breach procedure, how is it possible to handle this ? (the above law says the contract can be resumed with 1 month notification)

if going to court will the fact that the property is in bad state, with frequent problems and partly not usable (bathtub etc..) be taken into account ?

Thank you very much

 

That has all been covered in my rental agreements that I have signed.

Posted

Hello

I don't wish to go to court buy landlord could as I have a long term lease and he won't easily find a new tenant mainly with the property issues.. I found another condo in the same building so I won't be difficult to locate..

As it seems someone doesn't understand my post my questions are

. Is there a law about leasing contracts and is the law I found only applicable for landlords renting more than 5 properties

. On a 2 years contract without any info saying how to break the contract is it possible to do it, of course sending a notice

. Is the bad state of some appliances (bathtub etc..) a cause of breach

Thank you

Posted
1 hour ago, timendres said:

 

Unless your deposit is more than 100,000 THB, simply moving out and abandoning your deposit is going to be much cheaper than "going to court".

Be a lot cheaper just to fit a new bath.

Posted

Thank you very much..That is what I unfortunately thought..

My mistake to have trusted the guy (farang) and invested in his property only based on promises he made and he doesn't respect now.

Have a good day

Posted

Sorry.. by mistake answered from my partner account.. we are both in the same boat..Thank you

Have a good weekend 

Posted

The OP appears to be in a unit that requires some repair and maintenance and suggests that the landlord, despite being made aware of this, hasn't done anything.

 

Correct?

 

The OP has only mentioned the "bathtub" twice.

 

1 - Has this been raised with the landlord?

2 - Has the landlord made any comment or promised anything to resolve this?

3 - Has the landlord made repairs, but they have not resolved the issue?

 

Is there anything else that needs the landlords attention?

 

The OP has already set his sights on another, better unit. Better may include having features and fittings of a higher quality or standard and thus 'better value' when comparing the rent. Maybe it was recently remodelled? This shouldn't be seen as a contributing reason for seeking early termination of the current lease. We all want the latest model of car or phone but aren't entitled to get it just because our old one isn't up-to-date.

 

If the lease doesn't have any specific termination clause and details of how that affects any deposit held by the landlord (the OP is light on such details), the assumption is that he can give reasonable notice and vacate. Subsequent posts suggest that the OP doesn't think the landlord will refund anything? If there's also nothing in the signed lease that says he cannot do this, then he can.

 

Not sure about tenants being charged rent for units they have vacated until the landlord secures a new tenant. I saw this mentioned in another, earlier "deposit quandary" thread. Is that common? I've never seen that in any leases I have signed, but maybe it's a "condo thing"? Or even a "farang condo landlord thing"? My leases have been for houses, not condos and only with Thai landlords.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Again thanks a lot..

I agree we should have been much more specific when signing and later.. our mistake.. 

FYI 3 years contract 2 months deposit, rent due by trimester in advance.. no clause inside allowing to breach the contract..only less than a year contract already

We spent more than 150.000 bahts of our own money in condo renovations based on the fact we "could rent as long as we wanted as he wished to rent and no more to sell".. just to be informed he decided to put it for sale again.

Work we did and money we spent were not important on long term..

Our mistake.. we shouldn't have trusted him.. Thought I had no legal way to breach the contract but just wanted to be sure.. thanks for your help.

Have a good day

Posted

I would just move out, but further away than the same condo building.

 

Don't worry about a Farang threatening you to take it to court - it wont happen.

 

He probably does not have a permit to get income from a rental in Thailand and not paying any taxes to the government anyway.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Hello

Yes..I am sure he doesn't pay any tax.. we sent a registered letter reminding him he said he had removed the condo from the sale and expect his answer.

Our problem is that we like the residence....

Anyway we can also play the same game.. not allow visits..if not happy then he has to break the contract.. and we will leave..

Let s see what he will answer..but already he sent a SMS saying he doesn't want us to leave at all.. 

He wants to play on both sides..get the rent as before we entered here he had an extremely high debt in expenses maintenance with the condominium which he paid with our loan, and try to sell ..

Let s see how it goes on

Have an excellent day 

Posted

You are making something out of nothing asking about so call laws.

 

First, how long have you been in this unit since you are still under contract?  4 months 6,8, funny if so did all of a sudden the place is falling apart? Or as you noted you like the resident jump into the contract now see something better and want out?

 

If as bad as noted repairs arent made the contract has already been voided!

Two, a guy as you stated wont fix something most likely isnt going to take you to court. The fact your are interested in another unit same building having access to you can be a problem. One thing for sure this is the type of owner wont give your deposit back no matter what!

Personal just give him notice fail to act on contract before you do make sure your new contract you cover what you fail to do the first time.

 

 

 

Posted

You are right.. To explain what we didn't do at first (but it is our mistake as said) we have sold our apartment in another condo and the buyer wanted it immediately (1 week) so we were in a big rush to find something and move out..

Making improvements at our cost if we could stay "as long as we wanted" was not a big deal..it is now as the condo is put for sale..

Let's see how things will move

Best regards 

 

 

Posted

I personally knew a brit, broke his contract, thought he just lose 2 months deposit... landlord took him to court, he was made to pay the remaining months left... and could not leave thailand before it was settled...

Posted
On 2/2/2024 at 10:34 PM, domdom said:

Hello

I read that the new law regarding lease contracts (a few years ago already) only applies for landlords having 5 or more properties they rent out.. Is it so or does it apply also to other landlords ? Is there a precise law regarding the lease contracts (receipts to issue, payments to do and possibility of breaching the contract for lack of maintenance or the landlord) ?

When having a contract which doesn't have a breach procedure, how is it possible to handle this ? (the above law says the contract can be resumed with 1 month notification)

if going to court will the fact that the property is in bad state, with frequent problems and partly not usable (bathtub etc..) be taken into account ?

Thank you very much

If you go to court as a foreigner vs a Thai the judge will ask you if the property was in this condition when you moved in.

If you say "Yes" he will call you an idiot and tell you to pay the contract in full and suggest you move.

If you say "No" he will tell you to pay for repairing the damage you've done and pay your contract in full.

Posted

Owner is farang..

I think now some people gave right inputs and subject might now be closed by moderators

Have a good day

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...