4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

To call out people for being disrespectful in my book is not a personal attack. Simply pointing out that flippant comments when someone has been killed IMO isn't particularly good form.

"Good form" isn't really an AN members' trait.

4 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Thailand ,so many ways to die ,especially if not careful.

This planet, not just Thailand, so many ways to die ,especially if not careful.

6 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

I agree and have argued this point many times over the years on AN forums, this nonsense, RIP's to strangers.

 

They could be nasty people, criminals, Pedo's, murderers etc.

 

Why do these people want to do this, it really annoys me.

 

 

RIP is a religious term. IMO if one is dead one cannot rest or have peace because one no longer exists.

4 hours ago, steven100 said:

Should it be found that the construction intrusion attributed to his fall and fatality then one would expect compensation would be forwarded to the family, but TIT so who knows.

Should it be found that his smoking in an area in which it is banned (i.e. the entire train) contributed to his fall and death then one would expect compensation to be non-existent.

21 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

RIPs to total strangers, from total strangers, on a forum that his family is unlikely to know exists (never mind care about the thoughts of its usually vitriolic, anonymous members) are, by definition, pointless apart from for the self-aggrandising, back-patting, virtue signalling RIP-ers.

Totally out of context and as parasitic as all your rubbish Lou.

I don't RIP anyone, just used the term as an indicator in this instance.

3 hours ago, steven100 said:

4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

You are not supposed to sit between carriages. 

Construction companies working on SRT facilities are not supposed to leave exposed construction obstacles or intrusions that could cause injury or fatality in situ. 

The only person who may have been affected by placing himself in an area in which there was a likelihood of severe personal injury was the Canadian doing something not only prohibited, but stupid.  The construction outside the train posed no danger to any other passenger on that train, or that route!

23 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

I lived there also, the worker would only see a few trains his shift. You don't know what you are talking about. 

 

How good is this forum, a Canadian dies and people want to stupidly argue about trains. 

 

Get a life LOOSERS. 

 

 

You've probably forgotten, but you're the one who started the debate about train numbers by disagreeing with me and insisting, ludicrously, that there is only one train a day on that line!

You haven't conceded, nor let it go, but have degenerated to name calling. Albeit you can't even get that right.

33 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

42 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Er, an avoidable death was the outcome.

How very pedantic of you. Yep he didn't avoid the avoidable death.

Odd how accuracy becomes pedanticism over complete inaccuracy here.

30 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

How good is this forum, a Canadian dies and people want to stupidly argue about trains. 

 

Get a life LOOSERS. 

Don't forget that you're one of those "arguing stupidly about trains"!

25 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

37 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

RIPs to total strangers

I agree and have argued this point many times over the years on AN forums, this nonsense, RIP's to total strangers.

 

They could be nasty people, criminals, Pedo's, murderers etc.

 

Why do these people want to do this, it really annoys me.

"Why do these people want to do this, it really annoys me".

Virtue signalling, that's all, there can be no other reason when they have no connection, whatsoever, with the deceased.  That, or they're wannabe clerics!

15 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Don't forget that you're one of those "arguing stupidly about trains"!

Yeah, sadly I bite easily, bloody antagonisers. 

 

It's really weird, you make one silly comment about a guy having a nap in a strange place during working hours and all the looser want to attack you. 

 

4 hours ago, steven100 said:

Should it be found that the construction intrusion attributed to his fall and fatality then one would expect compensation would be forwarded to the family, but TIT so who knows.

 

There are nothing 'intruding' if trains pass that location all the time with no problem, 
as these vintage thai railways posters will attest

 

And most of the construction is done, his danfling feet is probably got snagged by the station platform edge 

 

18 minutes ago, Old Croc said:

43 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

RIPs to total strangers, from total strangers, on a forum that his family is unlikely to know exists (never mind care about the thoughts of its usually vitriolic, anonymous members) are, by definition, pointless apart from for the self-aggrandising, back-patting, virtue signalling RIP-ers.

Totally out of context and as parasitic as all your rubbish Lou.

I don't RIP anyone, just used the term as an indicator in this instance.

My responding to your comment about "RIPs" was not out of context in any way.   You did admonish another poster for not "RIP-ing"!

17 minutes ago, Old Croc said:

You've probably forgotten, but you're the one who started the debate

Nope, WRONG. 

 

You started the debate, you were the one who replied to my first comment. 

 

You've probably forgotten, go back and look. 

 

.

41 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

This planet, not just Thailand, so many ways to die ,especially if not careful.

Your right Lou , but this was is a Thai forum , no need to correct every little thing.

 

regards worgeordie

44 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

The only person who may have been affected by placing himself in an area in which there was a likelihood of severe personal injury was the Canadian doing something not only prohibited, but stupid.  The construction outside the train posed no danger to any other passenger on that train, or that route!

I remember 60 years back reading a sign on an Italian train window, roughly translated, "it is extremely dangerous to put any part of your body outside the train while it is moving".

They were right!

3 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I remember 60 years back reading a sign on an Italian train window, roughly translated, "it is extremely dangerous to put any part of your body outside the train while it is moving".

They were right!

Trains in Britain used to have (maybe still have) similar warnings for the extremely stupid.

15 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

58 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

This planet, not just Thailand, so many ways to die ,especially if not careful.

Your right Lou , but this was is a Thai forum , no need to correct every little thing.

There is when the suggestion (in a comment on a forum that has the tendency to bash Thailand unremittingly) is that it is peculiar to Thailand.

18 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

.

 

Lou , it was the 168 to Chumphon that got him..

 

very tragic event.

may he rip.

11 minutes ago, steven100 said:

36 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

.

 

Lou , it was the 168 to Chumphon that got him..

 

very tragic event.

I didn't say that it wasn't that train and I didn't say that it wasn't tragic. 

33 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

This planet, not just Thailand, so many ways to die ,especially if not careful.

Your right Lou , but this was is a Thai forum , no need to correct every little thing.

No need to try to tell me what to post.

7 hours ago, Ralf001 said:

 

He's a smoker.

Grim reaper was already sharpening the scythe.

He's a smoker but only in his twenties ,he had plenty of life left.

Don't smoke. You will live longer.

2 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

.

 

Lou, I was just thinking before .. imagine the excruciating pain this poor guy must have endured.   

8 hours ago, Lemsta69 said:

 

I guess you've never been to Indonesia.

 

 Or India...

 

14 hours ago, webfact said:

The friends tracked his last known location near Klong Bang Tarn Station in the Banpong district of Ratchaburi province using his phone signal.

What does that mean?  How do third parties track their friend's phone "using its signal" without uploading some kind of spy app?   If I call a mate, there's no indication shown to me of his whereabouts.  

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What does that mean?  How do third parties track their friend's phone "using its signal" without uploading some kind of spy app?   If I call a mate, there's no indication shown to me of his whereabouts.  

 

I reckon the pigs prolly got onto mobile service provider and got em to ping his phone or some <deleted>.

1 hour ago, steven100 said:

 

Lou, I was just thinking before .. imagine the excruciating pain this poor guy must have endured.   

If the leg injury was so severe that he was bleeding to death, he'd probably have have been unconscious in a few seconds due to the lack of. blood/oxygen flow to his brain.

8 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

9 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What does that mean?  How do third parties track their friend's phone "using its signal" without uploading some kind of spy app?   If I call a mate, there's no indication shown to me of his whereabouts.  

 

I reckon the pigs prolly got onto mobile service provider and got em to ping his phone or some <deleted>.

"Police officers and railway authorities set out a search party for Ryan but could not locate him.  The friends tracked his last known location near Klong Bang Tarn Station..."

So the friends must have been lying?  Wonder why?