Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why are the current updated vaccines still only FDA approved and authorized as for emergency use ?

Are recipients still being used in a global test laboratory ?

The mRna  vaccine research started with Ebola but to this day has never been adopted for use for that very lethal disease.

I am content with the fact I received an alternative vaccine to mRna .

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, dhupverg said:

 

So you managed to dig up a right-wing anti-vax, anti-face masks academic from Stanford.  You can see what other scientists think of his opinions:

 

"In January 2022, the conservative periodical City Journal published an opinion piece by Prasad in which he attempted to demonstrate that the American public health organizations were not being honest in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic.[27] Writing for Science-Based Medicine, epidemiologist Lynn Shaffer criticized Prasad's article for the various "mistruths" it contained about face masks as a COVID-19 mitigation measure, for example the unevidenced claim that mask wearing was stunting children's language development. In Shaffer's view Prasad's writing "lean[s] heavily on pushing people's emotional hot buttons" and amounted to a form of fearmongering.[28]

 

Prasad was an early member of the Urgency of Normal, a group that in 2022 campaigned against quarantines and mask mandates in schools during the COVID-19 pandemic.[29] He spoke in support of repealing such mandates in a March 2022 interview.[30]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinay_Prasad#Covid_response

 

And further:

 

"If anyone wonders why I haven’t taken Dr. Prasad seriously for a very long time, the quote above should tell you why. He knows his audience and now completely caters to it. Whether he himself believes his antivax pandering anymore, only he can say, but for all practical purposes whether he believes it or not is irrelevant. His messaging is antivax even to the point where he credulously bought into one of RFK Jr.’s favorite old antivax tropes, undermined the childhood vaccination schedule. with EBM methodolatry, and echoed old antivax “do not comply” messaging, and that, unfortunately, is more than enough."

 

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/dr-vinay-prasad-vs-a-vaers-study-finding-more-reports-of-vaccine-injury-in-red-states/

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 0ffshore360 said:

Why are the current updated vaccines still only FDA approved and authorized as for emergency use ?

 

They're not what you claim above, but rather:

 

"As of September 2023, the updated COVID-19 vaccine formulations produced by Moderna and Pfizer are fully approved for use as a single dose for people ages 12 and up, and have emergency use authorization for use in children 6 months through 11 years old."

 

https://www.heart.org/en/coronavirus/coronavirus-questions/questions-about-covid-19-vaccination

 

AND

FDA Takes Action on Updated mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines to Better Protect Against Currently Circulating Variants

September 11, 2023

 

"Specifically, today’s actions include:

  • Approval of Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) to include the 2023-2024 formula, and a change to a single dose for individuals 12 years of age and older....
  • Approval of Spikevax (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) to include the 2023-2024 formula, a change to a single dose for individuals 18 years of age and older, and approval of a single dose for individuals 12 through 17 years of age....

 

  • Authorization of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use in individuals 6 months through 11 years of age to include the 2023-2024 formula...
  • Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use in individuals 6 months through 11 years of age to include the 2023-2024 formula...

 

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-action-updated-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-better-protect-against-currently-circulating

 

 

Posted
On 4/19/2024 at 3:55 PM, 0ffshore360 said:

Why are the current updated vaccines still only FDA approved and authorized as for emergency use ?

Are recipients still being used in a global test laboratory ?

The mRna  vaccine research started with Ebola but to this day has never been adopted for use for that very lethal disease.

I am content with the fact I received an alternative vaccine to mRna .

We’ll know in about ten years, just about the time frame we figure out the dangers of most other vaccines 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...