Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/17/2024 at 4:27 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

One wonders if they will be sending the press gang to Thailand to round up the draft evaders.

 

Not on the link, but according to Al Jazeera existing troops will not be excused after a period in the military, but have to continue serving. That's not going to make them happy.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/16/ukraines-zelenskyy-signs-new-army-draft-law-to-boost-conscription

Ukraine’s Zelenskyy signs new army draft law to boost conscription

Law obliges men to update their draft data, increases payments to volunteers and adds new punishments for draft dodging.

Very Few Ukrainians here now, they are home defending their country, thousands of Russians not willing to die for a despot

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, eisfeld said:

 

Exactly. If third countries wouldn't get involved in disputes between countries then any stronger country can just take over any smaller country.

 

It's like a school bully. The bully wont stop by himself and the bullied guy isn't strong enough to defend himself. Others have to step in. Which is also the whole idea of NATO. All countries together are too strong for anyone else to try to invade any individual member state.

It's like a school bully. The bully wont stop by himself and the bullied guy isn't strong enough to defend himself. Others have to step in. Which is also the whole idea of NATO. All countries together are too strong for anyone else to try to invade any individual member state.

 

Agreed, but NATO is for NATO countries, not all of the world.

Ukraine isn't in NATO and NATO isn't the world's policeman. There are plenty of lovely wars to get involved in all over the world, but the only one NATO has got involved in is one with white people and it ignores all the ones with dark skinned people.

 

Tell me why the west didn't stop China invading Tibet. They didn't did they? Didn't do anything, nothing at all. So much for standing up against the bullies.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Seppius said:

Very Few Ukrainians here now, they are home defending their country, thousands of Russians not willing to die for a despot

You should give them all white feathers.

  • Confused 1
Posted
15 hours ago, tuktuktuk said:

I'm struggling to understand why the minimum draft age in Ukraine  is 25.

Perhaps, like so many in the west, youths are fat, unfit and would be useless in combat.

Anyway, if it keeps going as is perhaps they will be conscripting 15 year olds soon.

 

IMO any country that has to conscript the unwilling has to do so because the citizens do not agree that the war is worth dying in.

  • Confused 3
Posted
14 hours ago, G_Money said:

Surprised you’re not blaming Trump.

 

This invasion would not of happened under a Trump presidency.

 

If Trump was in place, he would settled everything with a stroke of a pen on the map granting Putin Crimea and Donbas

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Wobblybob said:

🎶 If Trump ruled the world everyday would be the first day of spring 🎶. 🥴😂😂😂

 

Another gem Hummin, keep em cummin.

continue making a fool of yourselves, dont you? 

 

Now you insinuate om a pro Trump dont you? 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hummin said:

If Trump was in place, he would settled everything with a stroke of a pen on the map granting Putin Crimea and Donbas

Crimea was invaded under Obamas presidency.  Obama-Biden same same.

  • Confused 3
  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's like a school bully. The bully wont stop by himself and the bullied guy isn't strong enough to defend himself. Others have to step in. Which is also the whole idea of NATO. All countries together are too strong for anyone else to try to invade any individual member state.

 

Agreed, but NATO is for NATO countries, not all of the world.

Ukraine isn't in NATO and NATO isn't the world's policeman. There are plenty of lovely wars to get involved in all over the world, but the only one NATO has got involved in is one with white people and it ignores all the ones with dark skinned people.

 

Tell me why the west didn't stop China invading Tibet. They didn't did they? Didn't do anything, nothing at all. So much for standing up against the bullies.

 

NATO is not involved in the Ukraine war. Some NATO member countries are supporting Ukraine with funds and weapons but that is a different thing. If NATO would be involved in the war then it would look very, very different.

 

Why the west didn't stop China from invading Tibet? Well they can't defend everyone now can they? They wouldn't be in a very good position to defend there just geographically speaking and then you also have to be a bit realistic in that western countries have to take into account geopolitical threats, economic threats and other strategic considerations. But you can see both Russia and China have taken over territories before without much opposition and it has embolded them to do more of the same as we are seeing.

  • Agree 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, eisfeld said:

NATO is not involved in the Ukraine war. Some NATO member countries are supporting Ukraine with funds and weapons but that is a different thing. If NATO would be involved in the war then it would look very, very different.

 

Why the west didn't stop China from invading Tibet?

One minute you are talking about "NATO" then you talk about the "west"!  The terms are NOT interchangeable!

One is a treaty group who would have no cause or mandate to defend Tibet while the so called "west" is not a cohesive group with any mandate to interfere in Tibet!

 

PS;  Do you classify Turkey as being in the west?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hummin said:

continue making a fool of yourselves, dont you? 

 

Now you insinuate om a pro Trump dont you? 

You were the one singing his praises and due to contrary belief Trump cannot do wonders and pass cucumbers, he lies Hummin, he lies!

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

One minute you are talking about "NATO" then you talk about the "west"!  The terms are NOT interchangeable!

One is a treaty group who would have no cause or mandate to defend Tibet while the so called "west" is not a cohesive group with any mandate to interfere in Tibet!

 

PS;  Do you classify Turkey as being in the west?

 

 

 

 

I replied to two different questions from another poster. You have to read the quoted post before reading my reply to it. Two questions, two answers. In both cases separated by some newlines.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Wobblybob said:

You were the one singing his praises and due to contrary belief Trump cannot do wonders and pass cucumbers, he lies Hummin, he lies!

I think I have stated my despise for Trump enough times, and most would know the irony in my post! 

 

Im not two faced ignorant single minded, just for your information. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...