Michael Cohen Takes Center Stage in Trump's Hush Money Trial

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

I never said there was a campaign finance violation, you made that up. 

 

 

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, he went to jail for tax evasion. He pled guilty to the campaign finance violation to get a reduced sentence such that he could help with the prosecution of Trump.

 

 

You two can figure out what you believe.

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Still no evidence of any unnamed crime

Trump falsified business records to hide a campaign finance violation.

[Yellowtail]

9 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You two can figure out what you believe.

Just because Cohen pled guilty to a campaign finance violation to get a reduced sentence for his tax-evasion charges, does not mean there was an actual campaign finance violation. 

 

 

[Yellowtail]

12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump falsified business records to hide a campaign finance violation.

When did the payment to stormy become a campaign finance violation? 

 

Federal campaign finance violations fall under the jurisdiction of the FEC. Why did they choose not to prosecute Trump? 

[Yagoda]

59 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump falsified business records to hide a campaign finance violation.

What admissible evidence in court supports that? Nobody can point me to any,  just make bald allegations. What's the campaign violation, that means what statute was violated? Nobody seems to know

[Eric Loh]

21 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Oh look another hate ridden trumpaphobic. Hater of the US Constitution too

True. Trump want to terminate the constitution in his tweet. 

[scottiejohn]

4 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Did you have a quote? I thought not.

Do you have something else to say instead of repeating the same pointless post?

Preferably something sensible and appropriate to the topic you think/actually you are replying to!

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

When did the payment to stormy become a campaign finance violation? 

 

Federal campaign finance violations fall under the jurisdiction of the FEC. Why did they choose not to prosecute Trump? 

The FEC declined to go after Michael Cohen for his campaign finance violation because he had already pled guilty.

 

No one is accusing Trump of a campaign finance violation, that's in your head.

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

What admissible evidence in court supports that? Nobody can point me to any,  just make bald allegations. What's the campaign violation, that means what statute was violated? Nobody seems to know

Michael Cohen pled guilty to a campaign finance violation, please try to keep up.

[Rimmer]

Multiple bickering and baiting posts have been removed, also replies

[Danderman123]

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Still no evidence of any unnamed crime

Can you explain why Trump didn't pay Stormy Daniels using funds from the Trump campaign?

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

Can you explain why Trump didn't pay Stormy Daniels using funds from the Trump campaign?

Because it would have been a campaign finance violation. 

[Yellowtail]

20 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The FEC declined to go after Michael Cohen for his campaign finance violation because he had already pled guilty.

The campaign was in 2016, and Cohen was convicted of tax evasion and plead guilty to campaign finance violations in the second August of 2018. 

20 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

 

No one is accusing Trump of a campaign finance violation, that's in your head.

So, Trump's books were "falsified" to hide Cohen's crimes, correct? 

[Yagoda]

41 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Can you explain why Trump didn't pay Stormy Daniels using funds from the Trump campaign?

Huh? Not President Trumps place to explain anyhting. Why shift a way from the real issue: facts supporting each and every element of the offense, which nobody has shown.

[Yagoda]

19 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So, you have no idea. I thought not. 

None of them do. Just invective towards even the people who stand by the constitution they seek to destroy.

 

None of them can even lay out a crime. Ranting speeches, slurs, cartoons.....but no crime.

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Michael Cohen pled guilty to a campaign finance violation, please try to keep up.

What does that have to do with anyhting other than his credibility

[Chomper Higgot]

11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Huh? Not President Trumps place to explain anyhting. Why shift a way from the real issue: facts supporting each and every element of the offense, which nobody has shown.

Reminding you once again.

 

The Jury will decide what has and has not been proven.

 

It won’t be long now until they do.

[Chomper Higgot]

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

What does that have to do with anyhting other than his credibility

It demonstrates he is able and willing to man-up and admit to his wrong doing.

 

Definitely more credible than someone who denies responsibility, blames everyone else and refuses to defend himself under oath.

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Because it would have been a campaign finance violation. 

 

You just made that up, because you don't have an answer.

[Danderman123]

17 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

None of them do. Just invective towards even the people who stand by the constitution they seek to destroy.

 

None of them can even lay out a crime. Ranting speeches, slurs, cartoons.....but no crime.

Trump falsified business records to cover up a campaign finance violation.

[Danderman123]

22 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Huh? Not President Trumps place to explain anyhting. Why shift a way from the real issue: facts supporting each and every element of the offense, which nobody has shown.

Have you considered the possibility that maybe everyone else but you isn't wrong, the case has been proven but you just don't get it?

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So, Trump's books were "falsified" to hide Cohen's crimes, correct? 

That is a certainty.

 

Crimes committed at the direction and with the approval of Trump.

Edited May 15 by Danderman123

[Danderman123]

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

What admissible evidence in court supports that? Nobody can point me to any,  just make bald allegations. What's the campaign violation, that means what statute was violated? Nobody seems to know

What do you think of the performance of Trump's attorneys so far?

[Yagoda]

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

What do you think of the performance of Trump's attorneys so far?

How would I know, Im not in the Courtroom. Duh.

[Yagoda]

15 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Have you considered the possibility that maybe everyone else but you isn't wrong, the case has been proven but you just don't get it?

Still no facts. Nothing for me to get LOL

[Yagoda]

17 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump falsified business records to cover up a campaign finance violation.

And what was the campaign finance violation. What statute? 

 

Who testified that Trump made the entries into the records? 

[Yagoda]

26 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It demonstrates he is able and willing to man-up and admit to his wrong doing.

 

Definitely more credible than someone who denies responsibility, blames everyone else and refuses to defend himself under oath.

Spoken like someone with NO knowledge of the US legal system. Just screeches of deranged elitist rage again.

[Yagoda]

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Reminding you once again.

 

The Jury will decide what has and has not been proven.

 

It won’t be long now until they do.

And again, none of you screechers can give any facts, or even the statute that was violated.

 

How do you know the case will even go to the jury?

[Danderman123]

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Still no facts. Nothing for me to get LOL

2 parts to the charges:

 

Trump falsified business entries. That has been proven in court, and admitted to by Trump accountants. Tell me if you disagree.

 

The false business entries were intended to cover up a campaign finance violation. Again, this has been testified to by multiple people. Do you disagree?

 

If you can't grasp this, there is something wrong with you.

[Danderman123]

Just now, Yagoda said:

And again, none of you screechers can give any facts, or even the statute that was violated.

 

How do you know the case will even go to the jury?

The statute that was violated is listed in the charging document.

 

Please don't pull a @Yellowtail and claim if I haven't memorized the statute that Trump is therefore innocent.