Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Nuclear power is a very good alternative to oil, gas, coal, etc.

But somehow many of the green do gooders don't like it. Sad. 

 

In the hands of experts yes it's good, however.... 

  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Dibbler said:

The day Thailand breaks ground on its first nuclear plant is the day all subcontractors scheme how they can build a thinner concrete wall around it and pocket the change.  All sensible citizens should be moving to the next country when that happens! 

Preferably upwind.

Posted
1 hour ago, SpaceKadet said:

It's already been discussed in another post that Thailand would be interested in deploying SMR's. 

They would not be build in Thailand and have no immediate operational requirements. Kind of plug'n'play.

I would definitely trust Thailand to deploy SMR's safely. If need be, I would build my house next to one.

How long have you been in Thailand? Maintenance and Thai sould never be used in the same sentence. Please list even one thing Thailand services properly as specified? Just one! Didn't they get into bother about aircraft maintenance! 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SpaceKadet said:

As stated earlier, SMR's that Thailand is interested in deploying, would not be manufactured in Thailand, and the civil infrastructure is no more complex than building a high rise condo block. We haven't had any high rises falling over yet, have we?

Heck, putting an underground in Bangkok's swampy soil is far bigger engineering challenge than deploying an SMR. 

 

You didn't read my previous post. The SMR's do not require any constant operation like the big NPP's do. Plug'n'play and fully automatic, with minimal maintenance requirement.

Don't remember any high rise problems, but plenty of overhead motorways dropping out of the sky

Posted

What could possibly go wrong when the Thai commission, build and operate a nuclear power plant? Let's think for a second....

  1. To showcase national pride, they hire local graduates from the Physics Dept. to design a new Thai-style nuclear power plant that will be "unique and the first of its kind in the entire world".
  2. They treat it like every other infrastructure project and it turns into an aircraft carrier-sized nightmare of epic proportions as mismatched and sub-standard parts are procured on separate contracts and critical systems are cut out by the lowest bidders. A Frankenstein's Monster is the resulting design.
  3. They actually build the thing and turn it on.
  4. The idiot third cousin twice-removed of the local bigwig gets assigned to the safety officer position and proceeds to use all the budget to fund his string of girls and fancy cars while no safety measures are actually put in place. He gets promoted to run the place after an inquiry while the only technical person involved in the entire project has it pinned on him and gets sent to prison. 
  5. The contaminated materials get carelessly disposed and local charlatans latch onto it and start packaging the waste as skin whitener so widespread radiation contamination occurs throughout the country.
  6. They have a party for the New Year and wreck the place in a drunken free-for-all while forgetting to turn the coolant stream back on after they leave so it melts down.

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Dibbler said:

The day Thailand breaks ground on its first nuclear plant is the day all subcontractors scheme how they can build a thinner concrete wall around it and pocket the change.  All sensible citizens should be moving to the next country when that happens! 

Nonsense. You know there are international comittees of experts that monitor, review, approve and inspect these plants, same with hydroelectric dams.

  • Agree 2
Posted

Thailand should no go Nuclear. The technology is great but does Thailand have 1. the knowledge, 2. people who are capable of running a nuclear plant and 3. maintenance workers who can provide the required support?

I would say no to all of the above. If they want to bring in foreigners to build, operate and instruct Thais then yes but I would doubt if Thailand would want to be dependant on foreign workers.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

Thailand should no go Nuclear. The technology is great but does Thailand have 1. the knowledge, 2. people who are capable of running a nuclear plant and 3. maintenance workers who can provide the required support?

I would say no to all of the above. If they want to bring in foreigners to build, operate and instruct Thais then yes but I would doubt if Thailand would want to be dependant on foreign workers.

Usually the US, the French or Russians would be involved in design and supply and construction and training on the plants.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, freeworld said:

Usually the US, the French or Russians would be involved in design and supply of the plants.

Hopefully the operation also

Posted
6 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

Hopefully the operation also

Yes, this is quite common for a number of years until the necessary knowledge and skills have been acquired.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Judging by so many of the comments here it would seem that the Highrise industry in Bangkok should be devoid of any so much wiser farang who live in the expectation of wholesale collapse of condos, shopping  malls and office blocks !

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Nuclear power plants in my opinion need to be kept to modern developed nations, who have the capabilities to tackle any major issues that could occur. 

 

The risk of something going wrong in a less developed nation is too risky. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Emdog said:

If conservation was practiced seriously, wouldn't need a reactor or other power source

Australia considered nukes, but studies show it costs twice as much as renewables and wouldn't be ready til 2040, if then

Would you trust Thai business to build, let alone run, a reactor? I wouldn't

Small modular reactors would be a good solution for Thailand. As of 2020 there were many ideas. Some are small enough to fit the modules in shipping containers. There is some construction to prepare the site, of course, but the complications of a major reactor are avoided.

SMR_Book_2020 table of contents.pdf SMR_Book_2020.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I doubt they've asked the IAEA if it's ok for Thailand to play with Nuclear Power? 

As I understand, they have been limited to very small research reactors...the Atom for Peace, Kesetsart University and I think Chulalongkorn University.....

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...