Jump to content

Trump's Vision for 2025: A Sweeping Crackdown on Immigration


Recommended Posts


2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You can't fine hotels and shelters you are contracting and paying to house illegal aliens. 

 

They need to be counted as illegal aliens in the census. 

 

Sanctuary cities should not receive any federal funding. 

then stop contracting them

yeah count them as criminals 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Highlighted comment in your post is sufficient; atypical MAGA comment.

Your tortoise tactic again. If someone asks you to defend your position you retreat like a tortoise into its shell and just shout accusations of "MAGA"

 and Far Right at them from the inside of your shell.

 

How is this a 'typical MAGA comment'? What other things do you think I believe based on the fact that I see the SPLC as a money raising organisation and politically motivated first?

 

There was an article written by somebody who worked there explaining how SPLC was not what it purported to be (and not what you seem to think it is think it is). I am sure there are some people there doing fine work against injustice, but it labels anything it doesn't like as "hate".

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2018/11/08/feature/is-the-southern-poverty-law-center-judging-hate-fairly/?utm_term=.50e97a7a3932&itid=lk_inline_manual_77

 

What it was really about was fundraising and living well off that.

 

https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114425/documents/HHRG-117-JU08-20220217-SD016.pdf

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/years-of-turmoil-and-complaints-led-the-southern-poverty-law-center-to-fire-its-founder-morris-dees/2019/04/05/58717bfc-50fa-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html

 

'The nonprofit apologized in 2015 after calling Ben Carson an extremist. Three years later, it apologized for including the former British politician Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim and a known critic of Islamic extremism, in a publication called “A Journalist’s Manual: Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists,” and agreed to a $3.4 million settlement with Nawaz’s foundation. The organization has also been dogged by questions, including from former employees, about whether it has been focused on fundraising at the expense of work that would further its mission.

'

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-reckoning-of-morris-dees-and-the-southern-poverty-law-center

 

Obviously there are some biased right wing outlets in the links below which must be treated with the same scepticism as one would show for the NYT and Guardian.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=southern+poverty+law+center+scam&client=firefox-b-e&sca_esv=7ea2f44d9ad24d06&sca_upv=1&sxsrf=ADLYWIJoWRHXhoxOM4uoNK6Et8LewuCscA%3A1720319883825&ei=i_-JZriEMuWY4-EPvZq-mAk&ved=0ahUKEwj49cz88pOHAxVlzDgGHT2ND5MQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=southern+poverty+law+center+scam&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiIHNvdXRoZXJuIHBvdmVydHkgbGF3IGNlbnRlciBzY2FtSJgTUPoGWKEOcAF4AJABAJgBbKAB5AKqAQMzLjG4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgOgAqoCwgIKECMYgAQYJxiKBcICBRAAGIAEwgILEAAYgAQYkQIYigXCAg4QABiABBiRAhjHAxiKBcICCBAAGIAEGKIEwgIIEAAYogQYiQWYAwCIBgGSBwMyLjGgB9MN&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=southern+poverty+law+center+discredited&client=firefox-b-e&sca_esv=7ea2f44d9ad24d06&sca_upv=1&sxsrf=ADLYWIIKSIyLb9R1XunIz-C9H1OJqgFVug%3A1720320150081&ei=lgCKZvbSBKCs4-EPwai0mAI&ved=0ahUKEwj29cf785OHAxUg1jgGHUEUDSMQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=southern+poverty+law+center+discredited&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiJ3NvdXRoZXJuIHBvdmVydHkgbGF3IGNlbnRlciBkaXNjcmVkaXRlZEjRwAVQnI4FWLK3BXAEeACQAQCYAWmgAYkLqgEEMTQuMrgBA8gBAPgBAZgCBqACrwPCAgoQIxiABBgnGIoFwgIOEAAYgAQYkQIYxwMYigXCAggQABiABBiiBMICBRAAGIAEwgILEAAYgAQYkQIYigXCAggQABiiBBiJBcICBBAjGCfCAggQABiABBjHA8ICFBAuGIAEGJECGNEDGMcDGMcBGIoFmAMAiAYBkgcDNS4xoAeRLA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Your tortoise tactic again. If someone asks you to defend your position you retreat like a tortoise into its shell and just shout accusations of "MAGA"

 and Far Right at them from the inside of your shell.

 

How is this a 'typical MAGA comment'? What other things do you think I believe based on the fact that I see the SPLC as a money raising organisation and politically motivated first?

 

There was an article written by somebody who worked there explaining how SPLC was not what it purported to be (and not what you seem to think it is think it is). I am sure there are some people there doing fine work against injustice, but it labels anything it doesn't like as "hate".

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2018/11/08/feature/is-the-southern-poverty-law-center-judging-hate-fairly/?utm_term=.50e97a7a3932&itid=lk_inline_manual_77

 

What it was really about was fundraising and living well off that.

 

https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114425/documents/HHRG-117-JU08-20220217-SD016.pdf

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/years-of-turmoil-and-complaints-led-the-southern-poverty-law-center-to-fire-its-founder-morris-dees/2019/04/05/58717bfc-50fa-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html

 

'The nonprofit apologized in 2015 after calling Ben Carson an extremist. Three years later, it apologized for including the former British politician Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim and a known critic of Islamic extremism, in a publication called “A Journalist’s Manual: Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists,” and agreed to a $3.4 million settlement with Nawaz’s foundation. The organization has also been dogged by questions, including from former employees, about whether it has been focused on fundraising at the expense of work that would further its mission.

'

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-reckoning-of-morris-dees-and-the-southern-poverty-law-center

 

Obviously there are some biased right wing outlets in the links below which must be treated with the same scepticism as one would show for the NYT and Guardian.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=southern+poverty+law+center+scam&client=firefox-b-e&sca_esv=7ea2f44d9ad24d06&sca_upv=1&sxsrf=ADLYWIJoWRHXhoxOM4uoNK6Et8LewuCscA%3A1720319883825&ei=i_-JZriEMuWY4-EPvZq-mAk&ved=0ahUKEwj49cz88pOHAxVlzDgGHT2ND5MQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=southern+poverty+law+center+scam&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiIHNvdXRoZXJuIHBvdmVydHkgbGF3IGNlbnRlciBzY2FtSJgTUPoGWKEOcAF4AJABAJgBbKAB5AKqAQMzLjG4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgOgAqoCwgIKECMYgAQYJxiKBcICBRAAGIAEwgILEAAYgAQYkQIYigXCAg4QABiABBiRAhjHAxiKBcICCBAAGIAEGKIEwgIIEAAYogQYiQWYAwCIBgGSBwMyLjGgB9MN&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=southern+poverty+law+center+discredited&client=firefox-b-e&sca_esv=7ea2f44d9ad24d06&sca_upv=1&sxsrf=ADLYWIIKSIyLb9R1XunIz-C9H1OJqgFVug%3A1720320150081&ei=lgCKZvbSBKCs4-EPwai0mAI&ved=0ahUKEwj29cf785OHAxUg1jgGHUEUDSMQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=southern+poverty+law+center+discredited&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiJ3NvdXRoZXJuIHBvdmVydHkgbGF3IGNlbnRlciBkaXNjcmVkaXRlZEjRwAVQnI4FWLK3BXAEeACQAQCYAWmgAYkLqgEEMTQuMrgBA8gBAPgBAZgCBqACrwPCAgoQIxiABBgnGIoFwgIOEAAYgAQYkQIYxwMYigXCAggQABiABBiiBMICBRAAGIAEwgILEAAYgAQYkQIYigXCAggQABiiBBiJBcICBBAjGCfCAggQABiABBjHA8ICFBAuGIAEGJECGNEDGMcDGMcBGIoFmAMAiAYBkgcDNS4xoAeRLA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp


When the SPLC attracts the vitriol laced ire of the ‘Alliance Defending Freedom’ and the ‘Heritage Foundation’ I know they are doing something right.

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


When the SPLC attracts the vitriol laced ire of the ‘Alliance Defending Freedom’ and the ‘Heritage Foundation’ I know they are doing something right.

 

It seems the SPLC are cut from the same cloth.

'

[N]othing was more uncomfortable than the racial dynamic that quickly became
apparent: a fair number of what was then about a hundred employees were African-
American, but almost all of them were administrative and support staff—“the help,” one
of my black colleagues said pointedly. The “professional staff”—the lawyers, researchers,
educators, public-relations officers, and fund-raisers—were almost exclusively white'

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/years-of-turmoil-and-complaints-led-the-southern-poverty-law-center-to-fire-its-founder-morris-dees/2019/04/05/58717bfc-50fa-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html

 

 

https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/109266/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20190409-SD022.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some off topic bickering and baiting posts and replies have been removed, please stop this pointless bickering exchange, thank you.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Strange thing about "putting kids in cages".  It kept them safe from predators and child traffickers.

 

Reports show the government lost track of 85,000 migrant children, and some of those children may have been forced into labor in the U.S.

 

https://www.npr.org/2023/04/19/1170802333/congressional-lawmakers-raise-concerns-about-the-welfare-of-migrant-children

 

Maybe AOC should cry for the 85,000 kids they've "misplaced"

 

 

 

 

 

I expect AOC doesn’t get her information from the same don’t as you do, not indeed the misinformation you rely upon.

 

https://publicintegrity.org/inequality-poverty-opportunity/immigration/gop-film-sound-of-freedom-misleading-migrant-kids/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I got mine from NPR, which you may recall, has 100% Dems on staff.  87 registered Dems and zero (count 'em zero) registered Repubs.  Pretty tough to call that one right wing misinformation.

 

https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust

 

 

 

 

 

You made a claim without a link.

 

I simply provided a link that debunks your claim.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

I'm pretty sure I left a link.  I even went out of my way to make sure my link was to a lefty source, lest I be accused of linking only to right wing nonsense.  With 10x as many registered Dems as Repubs in journalism, it's tough to find lefty sources that don't parrot the narrative.  You lefties don't appreciate how easy you have it, compared to any conservative that needs a link that won't be deleted because it's "not an approved source".

 

Edit:  As if the "approved" MSM hasn't been lying to us for years, recently exposed in undisputable detail.

 

You stole my thunder! I was thinking about creating a thread in the new Psandbox ! Cutting through the maze

to find unbiased news reports through

googles   algorithms..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I'm pretty sure I left a link.  I even went out of my way to make sure my link was to a lefty source, lest I be accused of linking only to right wing nonsense.  With 10x as many registered Dems as Repubs in journalism, it's tough to find lefty sources that don't parrot the narrative.  You lefties don't appreciate how easy you have it, compared to any conservative that needs a link that won't be deleted because it's "not an approved source".

 

Edit:  As if the "approved" MSM hasn't been lying to us for years, recently exposed in undisputable detail.

 

Notice how when the have "Republican" guests, they all think Biden is great and hate Trump? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""