President Kamala Harris

[candide]

25 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

 

Not lies, see source link to media. You can check data yourself. 

Gag! A tweet is not considered as a reliable source! Do you believe everything which is written on tweets?😃

Please show us a reliable source confirming that "The Biden/Harris Administration knowingly released a total of 425,431 convicted criminal illegal immigrants"

 

 

Edited October 6 by candide

[radiogeneris]

8 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Does what Musk is wearing not register as being a little concerning?

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

 

Google is known to manipulate search results... As per Grok AI (most truthful AI now), here:

 

As of the latest information available up to October 6, 2024, the states that do not require ID to vote in person include:

 

- California

- Illinois

- Maine

- Maryland

- Massachusetts

- Minnesota

- Nebraska

- Nevada

- New Jersey

- New Mexico

- New York

- Oregon

- Pennsylvania

- Vermont

- Wyoming

- Washington D.C.

 

Additionally, there might be provisions in other states for voting without an ID under specific circumstances, like signing an affidavit or using other forms of non-photo identification, but the above states are noted for not requiring ID as per general voter ID laws...

 

Source:

https://x.com/i/grok/share/4sTBcBNUIi3w9mcz2g3ZV2T2k

 

Here are additional sources with list of states that do not require ID to vote:

 

 

 

 

Legal Loophole:

 

 

 

 

 

 

[radiogeneris]

8 minutes ago, candide said:

Gag! A tweet is not considered as a reliable source! Do you believe everything which is written on tweets?😃

Please show us a reliable source confirming that "The Biden/Harris Administration knowingly released a total of 425,431 convicted criminal illegal immigrants"

 

 

 

Not the tweet, this is information from Fox News , mainstream media. It is included there. I have attached here for your convenience.

 

Edited October 6 by radiogeneris

[Fat is a type of crazy]

13 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

 

Google is known to manipulate search results... As per Grok AI (most truthful AI now), here:

 

As of the latest information available up to October 6, 2024, the states that do not require ID to vote in person include:

 

- California

- Illinois

- Maine

- Maryland

- Massachusetts

- Minnesota

- Nebraska

- Nevada

- New Jersey

- New Mexico

- New York

- Oregon

- Pennsylvania

- Vermont

- Wyoming

- Washington D.C.

 

Additionally, there might be provisions in other states for voting without an ID under specific circumstances, like signing an affidavit or using other forms of non-photo identification, but the above states are noted for not requiring ID as per general voter ID laws...

 

Source:

https://x.com/i/grok/share/4sTBcBNUIi3w9mcz2g3ZV2T2k

My point was that I assume they require proof of identity to register to vote as we do in Australia. But we don't have to provide ID to actually vote. Or are you saying at no stage either to register or to actually vote - is some sort of proof of ID required. 

[radiogeneris]

1 hour ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

I had a quick google and it seems almost all or all states require ID to register. Many require ID to vote. When I vote in Australia I provided ID to register - but don't need to provide ID when I vote - but they cross my name off and check that I don't vote more than once. No issues with fraud in Australia. Not sure if there is a factor I am missing. 

 

 

California passed a law last week that made it ILLEGAL to ask for ID in elections!

Literally impossible to prove fraud there now.

 

Source: Fox News

 

 

 

[Fat is a type of crazy]

10 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

 

 

California passed a law last week that made it ILLEGAL to ask for ID in elections!

Literally impossible to prove fraud there now.

 

Source: Fox News

 

 

 

I am differentiating between voter registration and casting a vote. My point was in Australia we need ID for the former but not the latter and it works well. It seems California is the same based on what I see. 

[candide]

31 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

 

Not the tweet, this is information from Fox News , mainstream media. It is included there. I have attached here for your convenience.

 

Where is Fox News quoted for stating Biden/Harris Administration knowingly released a total of 425,431 convicted criminal illegal immigrants" ?

[Hanaguma]

59 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

I am differentiating between voter registration and casting a vote. My point was in Australia we need ID for the former but not the latter and it works well. It seems California is the same based on what I see. 

Both.  In many states as well, if you get a drivers licence you can automatically register to vote. But there is no citizenship requirement for a DL.  California is like this. 

[thaibeachlovers]

15 hours ago, radiogeneris said:

 

Every major Bank has online ID verification and facial recognition.

 

Voting by mail is archaic, there whole process is like from 90s and can lead to errors and fraud.

 

There should be blochain based system with instant ID verification and online voting as well.  It is not that hard.

 

You need ID to get to library.

In an age of AI you must be a bit naive to believe that anything online is secure against hackers. Criminals probably pay better than the government or banks for good hackers.

[Danderman123]

10 hours ago, radiogeneris said:

 

Not the tweet, this is information from Fox News , mainstream media. It is included there. I have attached here for your convenience.

 

Over how many decades?

[radiogeneris]

10 hours ago, candide said:

Where is Fox News quoted for stating Biden/Harris Administration knowingly released a total of 425,431 convicted criminal illegal immigrants" ?

 

 

On September 25, Patrick J. Lechleitner — ICE’s deputy director and de facto acting head — sent a bombshell letter to Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) and 22 other House members revealing that 425,431 convicted criminals — including thousands of murderers and sex offenders — and 222,000-plus other aliens facing criminal charges are on the agency’s non-detained docket of removable aliens, known to the agency but at large in the United States.

 

Source: https://cis.org/Arthur/Why-ICE-Babysitting-Not-Removing-425431-Convicted-Criminals

 

Letter: https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/24-01143-ICEs-Signed-Response-to-Representative-Tony-Gonzales.pdf

 

Video link from Fox News:

 

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6362556076112

 

Fox News Article:

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-blames-harris-amid-data-showing-tens-thousands-criminal-migrants-us-deliberately-erased-border

"The data from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) says that, among those not in detention, there are 425,431 convicted criminals and 222,141 with pending criminal charges.

The figures include 62,231 people convicted of assault, 14,301 convicted of burglary, 56,533 with drug convictions and 13,099 convicted of homicide. An additional 2,521 have kidnapping convictions and 15,811 have sexual assault convictions..."

[radiogeneris]

25 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Over how many decades?

 

September 25th, 2024

 

Source: https://cis.org/Arthur/Why-ICE-Babysitting-Not-Removing-425431-Convicted-Criminals

 

Letter: https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/24-01143-ICEs-Signed-Response-to-Representative-Tony-Gonzales.pdf

 

[radiogeneris]

11 hours ago, candide said:

Gag! A tweet is not considered as a reliable source! Do you believe everything which is written on tweets?😃

Please show us a reliable source confirming that "The Biden/Harris Administration knowingly released a total of 425,431 convicted criminal illegal immigrants"

 

 

 

Source:

https://cis.org/Arthur/Why-ICE-Babysitting-Not-Removing-425431-Convicted-Criminals

 

On September 25, Patrick J. Lechleitner — ICE’s deputy director and de facto acting head — sent a bombshell letter to Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) and 22 other House members revealing that 425,431 convicted criminals — including thousands of murderers and sex offenders — and 222,000-plus other aliens facing criminal charges are on the agency’s non-detained docket of removable aliens, known to the agency but at large in the United States.

 

https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/24-01143-ICEs-Signed-Response-to-Representative-Tony-Gonzales.pdf

 

Letter

[Danderman123]

58 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

 

September 25th, 2024

 

Source: https://cis.org/Arthur/Why-ICE-Babysitting-Not-Removing-425431-Convicted-Criminals

 

Letter: https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/24-01143-ICEs-Signed-Response-to-Representative-Tony-Gonzales.pdf

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz04y0371lvo

 

However, a DHS statement said the data had been “misinterpreted".

“It also includes many who are under the jurisdiction or currently incarcerated by federal, state or local law enforcement partners,” the DHS said.

So, just because they are not being held by ICE, it does not mean they are all "roaming freely", as Trump claims.

“For example, Zacarias Moussaoui, who’s in a maximum security prison in Colorado for his role in the 9/11 attacks, is not currently detained by ICE so will likely be on that list,” says Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, an immigration enforcement expert at the American Immigration Council.

[Danderman123]

10 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Both.  In many states as well, if you get a drivers licence you can automatically register to vote. But there is no citizenship requirement for a DL.  California is like this. 

As a Canadian, you are probably not familiar with the US voter registration process.

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, radiogeneris said:

 

September 25th, 2024

 

Source: https://cis.org/Arthur/Why-ICE-Babysitting-Not-Removing-425431-Convicted-Criminals

 

Letter: https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/24-01143-ICEs-Signed-Response-to-Representative-Tony-Gonzales.pdf

 

The whining is recent, but the list is old. And includes lots detained under Trump.

[radiogeneris]

It's insane to see the Democrats rewriting the rules to win. They are pushing to legalize anything for power. 

 

Imagine the disaster it would be for America to become a permanent one-party, deeply socialist state if they succeed in winning this election.

 

Most people who do not see this are just probably Brainwashed by the mainstream media. It will be unfortunate if America becomes socialist nation and follow Venezuela. I really hope it will not happen 🙏 

[mdr224]

9 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

It's insane to see the Democrats rewriting the rules to win. They are pushing to legalize anything for power. 

 

Imagine the disaster it would be for America to become a permanent one-party, deeply socialist state if they succeed in winning this election.

 

Most people who do not see this are just probably Brainwashed by the mainstream media. It will be unfortunate if America becomes socialist nation and follow Venezuela. I really hope it will not happen 🙏 

People usually get the government they deserve. Do americans think for themselves, or just what the media tells them to think? This election will reveal the answer

[Danderman123]

20 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

It's insane to see the Democrats rewriting the rules to win. They are pushing to legalize anything for power. 

 

Imagine the disaster it would be for America to become a permanent one-party, deeply socialist state if they succeed in winning this election.

 

Most people who do not see this are just probably Brainwashed by the mainstream media. It will be unfortunate if America becomes socialist nation and follow Venezuela. I really hope it will not happen 🙏 

You are preparing yourself for a Trump loss.

 

Good.

[Danderman123]

10 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

People usually get the government they deserve. Do americans think for themselves, or just what the media tells them to think? This election will reveal the answer

Or will Americans listen to the hordes of foreign bloggers who lie about anything that they think hurts Harris?

[mdr224]

Just now, Danderman123 said:

Or will Americans listen to the hordes of foreign bloggers who lie about anything that they think hurts Harris?

No one lies more than your sources. I trust random opinions on facebook or twitter over the links you post here

[mdr224]

3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You are preparing yourself for a Trump loss.

 

Good.

If he doesnt i will make sure you dont want to return here

[Hanaguma]

33 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

As a Canadian, you are probably not familiar with the US voter registration process.

Not first hand, true. But I can read, which puts me ahead of most of your ilk.

[Will B Good]

17 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Many men of Trump's generation, some quite famous in the world of politics, dodged the draft.  He has a lot of company in that regard. 

 

But what cannot be denied is that he did show some serious stones when the would-be assassin tried to blow his head off. 

 

 

By ducking down and being bundled into a bulletproof car surrounded by the Secret Service agents.......serious stones.

[Hanaguma]

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

By ducking down and being bundled into a bulletproof car surrounded by the Secret Service agents.......serious stones.

You ever been shot at , WIll?  Ever feel the sting of a bullet?  Ever see and feel your own blood afterwards? Somehow I don't think so.  

 

Give the devil his due. Getting to his feet afterwards and gesturing to the crowd was a boss move. You are just too blinded by The Syndrome to be able to admit as much.

[Will B Good]

13 hours ago, radiogeneris said:

 

 

Here are additional sources with list of states that do not require ID to vote:

 

 

 

 

Legal Loophole:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But only Dem voters do this....correct?

 

 

 

[Hanaguma]

9 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

But only Dem voters do this....correct?

 

 

 

Obviously not. But it would be far better if NO ineligible voters did this, regardless of party affiliation, correct?

[Will B Good]

2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Obviously not. But it would be far better if NO ineligible voters did this, regardless of party affiliation, correct?

 

 

But the vast majority that are cheating must be Dem voters....correct?

 

Hence the extra 8 million votes????

 

 

 

[Keep Right]

Yes, she can win and more proof that there are many stupid people in the United States.

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Keep Right said:

Yes, she can win and more proof that there are many stupid people in the United States.

 

 

How old are you?