Jump to content

Krabi mother scammed twice while trying to bail out son


Recommended Posts

mom-1.webp


A mother from Krabi has been left devastated after being scammed twice while trying to secure bail for her son, costing her 100,000 baht and leaving her in debt. Her son remains in prison and she is pleading for help.

 

Lawyer Vichupan Chitpakdi, accompanied by 45 year old Boonta, approached reporters at 5pm yesterday, September 19, in Nonthaburi to report that a woman named Rung had deceived her by claiming she could facilitate her son’s bail.

 

Boonta’s 19 year old son, Teppan, was arrested on January 8 for opening a mule account while at his girlfriend’s house in Surat Thani. He was taken into custody by the Technology Crime Suppression Division (TCSD) and transferred to Bangkok for further legal proceedings, where he remains in Ratchada Criminal Court’s custody.

 

Boonta explained that her son had been tricked into opening the account while looking for a job at a restaurant in Phuket. The scammer promised to pay him through this new bank account. However, instead of securing employment, her son ended up being implicated in criminal activities.

 

In February, 35 year old Rung befriended Boonta and claimed she had connections with influential figures and politicians. Rung promised that these connections could help secure her son’s bail and mitigate the charges but required a fee of 125,000 baht—100,000 baht for the influential figures and 25,000 baht for the TCSD officers.


Desperate to free her son, Boonta borrowed money at exorbitant interest rates of 10% to 20%, managing to gather 98,000 baht. She handed the money to Rung, hoping it would expedite her son’s release.

 

However, in July, when they went to Ratchada Criminal Court to process the bail, they were informed that the investigation officer opposed the bail request. This raised Boonta’s suspicions, and upon questioning, Rung began to evade her queries.

 

Boonta continued to demand the return of her money from Rung, who kept assuring her that the bail process was still underway. Eventually, Rung became unresponsive, and despite Boonta’s persistent efforts, her son has yet to be granted bail.

 

Previous scam

 

Adding to her distress, Boonta revealed that she had previously been deceived by another lawyer who promised to help with her son’s bail for a fee of 10,000 baht. After paying the money, she discovered that no lawyer had ever contacted her son regarding the bail, realising she had been scammed for the first time.

 

Through tears, Boonta shared her hardships, stating that she earns a daily wage of 150 baht through odd jobs, while her husband suffers from heart disease and has undergone two surgeries, with another still needed. She expressed her deep sorrow over her son’s imprisonment and the additional burden of being cheated. She appealed to Rung to return her money due to her significant debt.

 

Lawyer Vichupan explained that Rung’s fraudulent activities involved falsely claiming connections with influential figures, including his name, which he was unaware of until August 22. On that day, Boonta visited her son in prison and revealed she had paid 98,000 baht, believing in the influential names Rung had mentioned.


Vichupan further stated that Rung continues to solicit donations under the pretence of using the funds to support individuals filing complaints against political parties. However, investigations into the donation funds and bank statements revealed discrepancies, indicating personal misuse of the money. Rung’s actions may violate the Public Solicitation Act and constitute fraud.

 

Regarding taking legal action, Vichupan advised Boonta against filing a police report, fearing injustice and delays due to Rung’s connections with influential people. Instead, they have gathered all evidence to directly file a lawsuit in court through the lawyer’s authority, reported KhaoSod.

 

by Puntid Tantivangphaisal
Photo courtesy of KhaoSod

 

Source: The Thaiger 

-- 2024-09-21


news-footer-3.png

 

image.png

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got to feel for these uneducated people at times, however we all know what LOS really stands for, if you haven't already been scammed, whether it was from a cop wanting tea money or an immigration officer wanting the same.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4MyEgo said:

You got to feel for these uneducated people at times, however we all know what LOS really stands for, if you haven't already been scammed, whether it was from a cop wanting tea money or an immigration officer wanting the same.

Agree, but there is a very strange thing here. She is only making 150 baht per day with a disabled husband. How could even loan sharks agree to lend her 100k? Even they say no, when there are no ways possible to get back the money. Or maybe she put the house and land up, but it says nothing about that.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

Agree, but there is a very strange thing here. She is only making 150 baht per day with a disabled husband. How could even loan sharks agree to lend her 100k? Even they say no, when there are no ways possible to get back the money. Or maybe she put the house and land up, but it says nothing about that.

Very true 150 baht would not even cover the daily interest. She obviously has some other assets I should imagine 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, well, what do you know. Why did that sweet heart of a son need to open a mule account in the first place in a place through a person far from home? 

If she pinpoints exactly, who was asking for the bribes, then the file moves a little closer. Somehow that money changed hands so, if the boys in brown would be serious to clean up the mess and come out as a winner, they will follow through. But, like in most other cases, the story will fizzle away and the recipients of the payments will be visited later on for a slice of the cake. 

The looser is the whining mother. The story with the boy has more chapters as well; start with why he needed a mule account and what did he intend (or done) with it. 

Not newsworthy, happened and will happen again as grieving Mummy wanted to take the short cut instead of letting her son stand for whatever he is/was accused for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

You got to feel for these uneducated people at times, however we all know what LOS really stands for, if you haven't already been scammed, whether it was from a cop wanting tea money or an immigration officer wanting the same.

In the US, the uneducated vote Democrat.  I do feel sad for this woman.  She needs help.  Bet the money did not come from a bank loan either.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Boonta explained that her son had been tricked into opening the account while looking for a job at a restaurant in Phuket. The scammer promised to pay him through this new bank account. However, instead of securing employment, her son ended up being implicated in criminal activities.

 

In February, 35 year old Rung befriended Boonta and claimed she had connections with influential figures and politicians. Rung promised that these connections could help secure her son’s bail and mitigate the charges but required a fee of 125,000 baht—100,000 baht for the influential figures and 25,000 baht for the TCSD officers.


Desperate to free her son, Boonta borrowed money at exorbitant interest rates of 10% to 20%, managing to gather 98,000 baht. She handed the money to Rung, hoping it would expedite her son’s release.

Like mother like son... both gullible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a woman hands over money obviously intended to pay off corrupt officials then complains when it doesn’t work.

 

I’m not feeling very sympathetic, it’s just another symptom of how broken the system is where people try to game it with bribery.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AhFarangJa said:

Just about says it all about the law here when a Lawyer advises you not to make a report because the other person has connections. Do you know who I am?

 

The lawyer has asked her to bypass making a POLICE report, because of the other woman's friends in the police station and fear of corruption, but instead to file her complaint directly with the court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Classic Ray said:

So a woman hands over money obviously intended to pay off corrupt officials then complains when it doesn’t work.

 

I’m not feeling very sympathetic, it’s just another symptom of how broken the system is where people try to game it with bribery.

 

It is all they know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now








×
×
  • Create New...
""