1 minute ago, candide said:

The article lists several payments made at different periods but doesn't calculate a total.

 

If you want to argue that the Clinton foundations received $84 million, feel free to prove it.

So about how much? 

 

$84M https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14382579/chelsea-clinton-breaks-silence-usaid-claims.html

 

 

6 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So about how much? 

 

Ok. Let's stop that silly game.

 

You are looking for counter-arguments and you don't have any. So you make hypotheses, and then you ask me questions so that I test your hypotheses for you. It's not my job to waste my time testing your hypotheses.

 

If you want to raise counter-arguments, waste your own time to look for information or data to test them. Your time, not my time!

So the “big lie” is that the $84 million went to the Clinton Foundation tgat Chelsea Clinton runs, not to Chelsea Clinton directly.

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Ok. Let's stop that silly game.

 

You are looking for counter-arguments and you don't have any. So you make hypotheses, and then you ask me questions so that I test your hypotheses for you. It's not my job to waste my time testing your hypotheses.

 

If you want to raise counter-arguments, waste your own time to look for information or data to test them. Your time, not my time!

Too late. I already checked. Per Chelsea Clinton, it was $84M

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

Too late. I already checked. Per Chelsea Clinton, it was $84B 

Source and quote? 🙂

Just now, candide said:

Source and quote? 🙂

I posted it above. 

 

 

1 minute ago, candide said:

Source and quote? 🙂

Just another load of MAGA nonsence and lies.......and it never stops, sadly.

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

I posted it above. 

 

 

Quote?

 

What you posted cites the Snopes.com article I posted as the source. There is no quote of Snopes stating that the Clinton foundation received $84 million. 

 

Both articles confirm my claim that Chelsea Clinton did not receive $84 million. It was a lie! 😆

3 minutes ago, candide said:

Quote?

 

What you posted cites the Snopes.com article I posted as the source. There is no quote of Snopes stating that the Clinton foundation received $84 million. 

 

Both articles confirm my claim that Chelsea Clinton did not receive $84 million. It was a lie! 😆

Correct, the Clinton Foundation got the $84m. 

 

And yes, you have to add up the numbers 

2 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You must be using that alternative definition of "coup de tat", where the elected person does what he has been elected to do.  🤦‍♂️

Your langue française is very weak.  Coup d'état is literally "blow against the state".

12 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Too late. I already checked. Per Chelsea Clinton, it was $84M

No. There is no quote of Chelsea Clinton saying that in the article. 🙂

2 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Your langue française is very weak.  Coup d'état is literally "blow against the state".

 

And your English doesn't seem to be too great...  🙄

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Correct, the Clinton Foundation got the $84m. 

 

And yes, you have to add up the numbers 

What's your calculation?

1 hour ago, bubblegum said:

 

MSNBC, is this even worth watching 

 

1 hour ago, candide said:

Another popular lie 🙂

 

USAID paid $44K to Politico, not over $8M as White House claimed. It was for subscriptions

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/usaid-payments-to-politico/

USAID funds snopes for how much?

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

And your English doesn't seem to be too great...  🙄

I can see you struggle with complicated grammar.  Are you sure you're not related to Trump?

8 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

MSNBC, is this even worth watching 

 

USAID funds snopes for how much?

Lame deflection! 🙂

10 minutes ago, candide said:

What's your calculation?

simple addition. 

5 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I can see you struggle with complicated grammar.  Are you sure you're not related to Trump?

You can't even spell gambler.

6 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I can see you struggle with complicated grammar.  Are you sure you're not related to Trump?

 

You're the one who made a mistake, not me.  🤷‍♂️ 

 

Are you sure you aren't related to Joe "my dementia is a speech impediment" Biden?

24 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Just another load of MAGA nonsence and lies.......and it never stops, sadly.

Says the guy who studies the facial features of old men then talks about their sex life whilst living in Thailand as an old man living a life we shall no mention.

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

simple addition. 

Then show your calculation. Because none of the two articles claims that the Clinton foundation received $84 million.

 

If you make a claim, you have to prove it.

3 hours ago, AlexRich said:

Who elected Elon Musk? He has no authority to access US Government data. 

2 hours ago, candide said:

Post a text I can check.

Well, how about you then, just post a text that I can check, rather than simple baseless affirmations, such as:

Musk never stops lying about USAID.

We already knew that, illidean reposted all his lying tweets! 🙂

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Then show your calculation. Because none of the two articles claims that the Clinton foundation received $84 million.

 

If you make a claim, you have to prove it.

You never do. I used the numbers from your link, and I provided a link with Chelsea saying the foundation got the money, not her

2 minutes ago, Andre0720 said:

Well, how about you then, just post a text that I can check, rather than simple baseless affirmations, such as:

Musk never stops lying about USAID.

We already knew that, illidean reposted all his lying tweets! 🙂

Can't you read? I was replying to a post linking an article listing Musk's lies.

Feel free to read this articles and contradict them with facts, if you can.

 

I also made several posts in this thread on specific claims, linking articles as source! 🙂

Feel free to read these articles and contradict them with facts, if you can.

6 minutes ago, mogandave said:

You never do. I used the numbers from your link, and I provided a link with Chelsea saying the foundation got the money, not her

It's not true. There is no quote of Chelsea saying the foundation got $84 million.

4 hours ago, placeholder said:

No, Musk isn't just exaggerating some things. He's lying and promoting lies.

.....and you of course know this to be true....? 🤥

58 minutes ago, candide said:

Quote?

 

What you posted cites the Snopes.com article I posted as the source. There is no quote of Snopes stating that the Clinton foundation received $84 million. 

 

Both articles confirm my claim that Chelsea Clinton did not receive $84 million. It was a lie! 😆

Hard to believe anyone taking Snopes seriously. They operate like this.

 

Actual claim. Chelsea and the Clinton foundation received $84m from USAID.

 

Snopes fact check claim. Is it true Chelsea and the Clinton foundation receives $84m from USAID for the purpose of self enrichment.

 

Snopes verdict. Mixed. There is no evidence any funds were given to the Clintons for self enrichment purposes.

 

Then low IQ leftists run around screeching Seeee its Deboooooonked!! Orange man fascist Hitler small hands bla bla

 

All. Day. Long.

45 minutes ago, candide said:

Lame deflection! 🙂

I was asking a question, I will watch it when I get home