5 hours ago, frank83628 said:

'Conspiracy addicts' from a guy that just said Trump was probably involved in Epstein's death

Clearly showing English is not your first language plus you don't care about the truth.

As if the orange conman  freak was not a part of that scene. I am sure anything to do with his name on it has been deleted.

6 hours ago, frank83628 said:

That has to be the most outrageous thing I've heard on this while forum. Haha, you live in a fantasy land

 

6 hours ago, frank83628 said:

'Conspiracy addicts' from a guy that just said Trump was probably involved in Epstein's death

Now I have to give you a remedial reading lesson. But before I do that, I'd like to point out that would be typical for a right-winger to stop with that first sentence and not explain why you need a remedial reading lesson. Here's what I wrote: 

 

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

 

You don't seem to understand the significance of "if there was foul play".  I did not claim that it was likely that there was foul play on the part of Trump. In fact as I have pointed out in this very thread Trump supporters who push a conspiracy theory have repeatedly gotten the facts wrong. There is no good evidence that Epstein's death was due to anything other than suicide and incompetence on the part of a very badly run prison.

 

1 hour ago, theshu25 said:

As if the orange conman  freak was not a part of that scene. I am sure anything to do with his name on it has been deleted.

Your certainty is unwarranted by the facts of the case.

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

 

Now I have to give you a remedial reading lesson. But before I do that, I'd like to point out that would be typical for a right-winger to stop with that first sentence and not explain why you need a remedial reading lesson. Here's what I wrote: 

 

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

 

You don't seem to understand the significance of "if there was foul play".  I did not claim that it was likely that there was foul play on the part of Trump. In fact as I have pointed out in this very thread Trump supporters who push a conspiracy theory have repeatedly gotten the facts wrong. There is no good evidence that Epstein's death was due to anything other than suicide and incompetence on the part of a very badly run prison.

 

So you dont think it was foul play, but if it was then it would have been Trump because he was president.

My reading comprehension if perfectly fine.

 

16 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So you dont think it was foul play, but if it was then it would have been Trump because he was president.

My reading comprehension if perfectly fine.

 

You continue to demonstrate your need for remedial reading. Here's the relevant part of my quote salient to your latest instance of miscomprehension.,

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

Do "likely" and  "a good chance" signify an assertion of fact?  I really don't have the time have to explain to you the difference between probability and certainty? I will offer you an explanation from AI but the problem is that, given your past form, there's a good chance you'll misconstrue this as well. Still, I live in hope:

 

"Probability is the likelihood of an event happening, while certainty is the state of being absolutely sure about something"

https://www.google.com/search?q=probability+vs+certainty&oq=probability+vs+certainty&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgkIABBFGDkYgAQyCQgAEEUYORiABDIICAEQABgWGB4yCAgCEAAYFhgeMggIAxAAGBYYHjIKCAQQABiABBiiBDIHCAUQABjvBdIBCDg3MThqMGoxqAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You continue to demonstrate your need for remedial reading. Here's the relevant part of my quote salient to your latest instance of miscomprehension.,

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

Do "likely" and  "a good chance" signify an assertion of fact?  I really don't have the time have to explain to you the difference between probability and certainty? I will offer you an explanation from AI but the problem is that, given your past form, there's a good chance you'll misconstrue this as well. Still, I live in hope:

 

"Probability is the likelihood of an event happening, while certainty is the state of being absolutely sure about something"

https://www.google.com/search?q=probability+vs+certainty&oq=probability+vs+certainty&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgkIABBFGDkYgAQyCQgAEEUYORiABDIICAEQABgWGB4yCAgCEAAYFhgeMggIAxAAGBYYHjIKCAQQABiABBiiBDIHCAUQABjvBdIBCDg3MThqMGoxqAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

I know exactly what you wrote.

With rewards to words like 'likely, possibility, reportedly, allegedly' you might want to be mindful  of those when commentling in the furture and adding legacy media links to prove a point.

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

I know exactly what you wrote.

With rewards to words like 'likely, possibility, reportedly, allegedly' you might want to be mindful  of those when commentling in the furture and adding legacy media links to prove a point.

Well, the only evidence I have of your understanding is what you write. And what you wrote clearly got it wrong. And the fact that you don't specifically address the points I've raised with some sort of rational refutation or acknowledge that your comments were in error, doesn't demonstrate that you "know exactly" what I wrote.

On 3/1/2025 at 7:19 AM, JAG said:

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Ill guarantee you the Trump is not on the client list.

 

Bet ya tons of NY Dems though.

4 hours ago, theshu25 said:

As if the orange conman  freak was not a part of that scene. I am sure anything to do with his name on it has been deleted.

Yep, so all you guys can do from here on in is mentally masturbate over stuff that doesnt exist.

17 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Well, the only evidence I have of your understanding is what you write. And what you wrote clearly got it wrong. And the fact that you don't specifically address the points I've raised with some sort of rational refutation or acknowledge that your comments were in error, doesn't demonstrate that you "know exactly" what I wrote.

you're mind numbingly boring.  

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

you're mind numbingly boring.  

Just another empty insult. You've got nothing.

On 3/1/2025 at 7:19 AM, JAG said:

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Putin chuckles, "This is nothing compared to what I have on Trump."

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Ill guarantee you the Trump is not on the client list.

 

Bet ya tons of NY Dems though.

Yeah sure susan/ thaibeachlovers . In yer dreams.

42 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Yeah sure susan/ thaibeachlovers . In yer dreams.

Who are those people? Are you having a freak out because you just know, deep down inside, that one or more of your political and cultural heroes was jetting off with Jeffy for some paedo fun?

 

Somebody is hiding something and it aint Trump

On 2/28/2025 at 9:01 PM, Social Media said:

 

Americans should prepare for new criminal prosecutions against individuals linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s illicit sex trafficking network, according to Alina Habba, Counselor to the President. She emphasized the need to hold accountable those who appeared on Epstein’s client list and those who shielded their associates from exposure as perpetrators of heinous crimes.

 

Habba described the documents as “incredibly disturbing,” revealing flight logs and other information that identify clients engaged in illegal activities. When asked by Piers Morgan on his show Uncensored whether the government would pursue criminal charges against these individuals, Habba responded unequivocally: “Absolutely.”

 

 

“I think it would be negligent for us not to,” she stated. “You have to hold individuals who are indeed rapists accountable. We have to have them tried, in my opinion.” She further insisted, “Nobody should be just dismissed. You have to have your time in court, and your case will be heard.”

 

Expressing her frustration, she added, “But to hide lists, to protect political friends, all of that – we don’t have time for that.”

 

Despite these strong assertions, The New York Post reported that a client list is not included in the initial release. The files, which circulated around the White House on Thursday afternoon, were labeled ‘phase one,’ hinting that additional disclosures would follow. A source who reviewed the documents in the West Wing suggested that the release might not deliver the explosive revelations many anticipated linking Epstein to prominent political and business figures.

 

To date, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell remains the only person convicted in connection to the Epstein case. Maxwell, a longtime associate of Epstein, was found guilty in 2021 of federal charges related to sex trafficking, recruiting young girls for the operation, child sexual abuse, and prostitution.

 

Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel were present at the White House on Thursday morning in anticipation of the release of the so-called Epstein Files. Bondi received the documents earlier in the week and stated they would be made public by Thursday.

 

Habba acknowledged a widespread sense of frustration regarding accountability in the Epstein case, saying, “There’s a general frustration with accountability – we take it halfway, we don’t take it home.” She added, “And I really believe now with Kash and Pam there will be accountability.”

 

She also suggested that the scope of the scandal is “far worse” than many had previously thought. This assertion followed Bondi’s revelation that there are 250 victims whose identities must be protected. “We have to be patient… when you’re dealing with victims,” Habba told Morgan.

 

Since Epstein’s death in August 2019, there has been widespread concern that justice would never be fully served, leaving the victims without closure and Epstein’s network of co-conspirators shielded by the government.

 

However, in an effort to bring transparency, President Trump issued an executive order last month directing Bondi to release previously classified records, including the Epstein Files, as well as documents related to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. This move marks a significant step toward uncovering the full extent of Epstein’s operations and ensuring justice for the victims.

 

Based on a report by The Daily Mail  2025-03-01

 

 

Well....we're still waiting for these prosecutions! 🤣

11 hours ago, candide said:

Well....we're still waiting for these prosecutions! 🤣

Heck we are still waiting for the list! lol 😂