On 3/11/2025 at 7:03 AM, Social Media said:

Protest leader Dan Glass defended the demonstration, arguing that the attempt to restrict public cruising is homophobic. "It's saying that queer people can't do what is legally and rightfully theirs, to have public displays of affection," he stated.  

I don't think it was such a bad thing when "public displays of affection" typically meant holding hands, not buggery and blowjobs.

 

 

9 hours ago, Baht Simpson said:

"Lucy Marsh of the Family Education Trust voiced concerns, stating, "Hampstead Heath is a much-loved public park and a green space that is enjoyed by families, especially those who don't have their own gardens. Parents should be able to enjoy a walk or a picnic without worrying about them seeing gay men having sex in a public place."  

 

This is not a case of people walking their dog seeing men have sex, it's a carefully orchestrated campaign by the Family Education Trust, a virulently anti-LGBTQ+ group, who campaign against the queer community. 

 

"Family Education Trust (FET) is a campaign group opposing the rights of LGBTQ+ people, especially those of transgender people. The group opposes LGBTQ+ education in schools and argues in favour of discriminating against same-sex couples in terms of adoption and access to care. FET supports legislation requiring teachers to “out” trans children to their parents and wants discrimination on the basis of gender identity to not be a hate crime.

 

The group’s leadership has praised Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. In 2022, the group promoted the anti-Drag Queen Story Hour campaign. The far-right priest Calvin Robinson spoke at a FET event in 2024."

 

Their agenda is to oppose gay rights under the guise of family. Calvin Robinson, the far-right pseudo priest is a fan and has spoken on their behalf. 

 

Source of quotes: https://hopenothate.org.uk/case-files-family-education-trust/

 

Whatever your views on this don't be fooled by these people and the Daily Mail.

That’s the kind of information that puts reports in perspective.

 

Well done.

 

17 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

exactly my thoughts, its good enough for (most) straight people. So  why do they feel that the laws of common decency do not apply to them?

 

Many of them are attention seeking exhibitionists. 10 minutes at any gay pride parade will confirm this. They want to shock people. They want to be seen as "special". 

16 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Probably for the same reason not all heterosexual couples ‘keep it at home’.

 

 

Heterosexual is normal.

 

Proud to be normal.

9 hours ago, proton said:

Why can't they keep it at home?

 

They like the random and public nature of it.

9 hours ago, Baht Simpson said:

The first advice given is always to meet in a public place

I assumed they meant somewhere like macdonalds, 

This whole story is about 🐶 dogs

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Probably for the same reason not all heterosexual couples ‘keep it at home’.

 

 

The overwhelming majority of straight people do "keep it at home"

21 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Many of them are attention seeking exhibitionists. 10 minutes at any gay pride parade will confirm this. They want to shock people. They want to be seen as "special". 

Rather than precious.

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Rather than precious.

 

Don't blame me that your hobby is under threat. 

 

And I don't mean dog walking. 😄 

29 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Don't blame me that your hobby is under threat. 

 

And I don't mean dog walking. 😄 

I have a number of hobbies, not at all related to the subject of this thread.

 

Perhaps you are letting your imagination get the better of you again.

1 hour ago, Bday Prang said:

The overwhelming majority of straight people do "keep it at home"

I expect the overwhelming majority of gay people do too.

11 hours ago, Baht Simpson said:

There are a number of instances where people who have met on dating sites come to harm,or are killed, including Grindr. The first advice given is always to meet in a public place. Plus, most are there for company, or hookups, not always sex. 

 

Yes. Same goes for hetero hookups, and even for Meta Marketplace exchanges. A dark park or secluded space isn't the same though.

On 3/11/2025 at 8:59 AM, Gandtee said:

My brain hurts. If they are exposing themselves in a public area, charge them with indecency.

 

What. !!!!!!!!

They don't have time for real police work.

They have Face book posters to go after.

When I was a kid in the 1940s- 50s  scrumping apples  with my mates. One of us was assigned to keep doggo. To watch out for anyone who might catch us. Doggo was, as far as we knew, nothing to do with sex. How times and the English language have changed. When did you last hear a News Announcer use affect or effect? Now everything has an 'impact.' Well, I'll be buggered.🫠

First place I was taken when I arrived in London back in 1992.

What's more offending is nudity on the beaches of Brighton  and Sitges with no bushes or shrubs for them to be hidden behind.

22 hours ago, proton said:

Why can't they keep it at home?

Home is where the heart is.

 

I don't see many of the denizens of Pattaya keeping it at home. 🙂

11 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Yes. Same goes for hetero hookups, and even for Meta Marketplace exchanges. A dark park or secluded space isn't the same though.

If it was a dark park or a secluded space it wouldnt really affect anybody, unless they were looking for it. 

13 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

The overwhelming majority of straight people do "keep it at home"

Apart from the thousands who go dogging. Here's a long and comprehensive list of dogging sites. I love the advice " wear sensible shoes". Lol

 

https://doggingbook.com/blog/dogging-locations-in-the-uk-the-best-places-to-meet-other-doggers-for-sex/

I used to live near in a gay neighborhood in Denver Colorado. When we went to walk in the park in the morning there were often used condoms littering the ground and I even got propositioned before by gay men.

 

Regardless of whatever I was told growing up my experience with gay men is that they're deranged sexual deviants. I think many of them were sexually abused as children even.

 

They really shouldn't be allowed to adopt boys or be in the boy scouts even if you ask me. Don't ask don't tell was a fair compromise I think but being opening gay needs to be red line for some spaces.

 

13 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Many of them are attention seeking exhibitionists. 10 minutes at any gay pride parade will confirm this. They want to shock people. They want to be seen as "special". 

 

America is morally diseased. Many people have bizarre sexual fetishes but they keep it private. Only homosexual pervasions are celebrated in America but it's all the same thing.

52 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

Home is where the heart is.

 

I don't see many of the denizens of Pattaya keeping it at home. 🙂

 

Boyz town?

In line of my FB groups some guys were complaining about how pride is so commercialized and corporate. I thought to myself welcome to being accepted they would complain if companies didnt attend. Anyway one guy was saying how it was a protest followed by a BBQ and gay orgy down non the river as a place that used to be known as bare ass beach.

 

I remember those days I was young and everybody protesting was mad because they all had AIDS from this type of thing. Apparently Ronald Reagan was at fault not having anonymous bare back sex in the bushes after dark. The times I attended pride back in the 90 the sunken faces from people virus swapping were more than a few. Some people just don't realize how gross they are. 

This would never happen in Denmark, they would bring the dogs and gays together and beautiful things would happen.

 

In the 70s anyway.

6 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

In line of my FB groups some guys were complaining about how pride is so commercialized and corporate. I thought to myself welcome to being accepted they would complain if companies didnt attend. Anyway one guy was saying how it was a protest followed by a BBQ and gay orgy down non the river as a place that used to be known as bare ass beach.

 

I remember those days I was young and everybody protesting was mad because they all had AIDS from this type of thing. Apparently Ronald Reagan was at fault not having anonymous bare back sex in the bushes after dark. The times I attended pride back in the 90 the sunken faces from people virus swapping were more than a few. Some people just don't realize how gross they are. 

Utter gibberish. Seriously mate, what on earth are you droning on about? 

6 hours ago, Cameroni said:

This would never happen in Denmark, they would bring the dogs and gays together and beautiful things would happen.

 

In the 70s anyway.

Pretty sick thing to say. 

8 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

Utter gibberish. Seriously mate, what on earth are you droning on about? 

i am gay and grew up in the 80s and became of age around 1990. The tales you would hear by people wasting away were many. They would tell you how great 1970s bath houses were. I am not kidding they thought behavior like this is normal.

Looks like this could be a slippery slope - they are coming for the gays now; next will be the doggers (if that is the correct term)...

 

The leafy Surrey enclave that's the al fresco sex capital of Britain with nearly 100 major dogging sites

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2455539/Surrey-enclave-al-fresco-sex-capital-Britain-nearly-100-dogging-sites.html

On 3/11/2025 at 9:27 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

Dogs have been traumatised. Many offended. RSPCA should get involved.

The Police should patrol and arrest them under indecency laws. If they can't, or won't, then that it a hole in legislation that definitely needs plugging. 

 

As the old saying goes, "Get a room!" 

 

One for the "Doggers".

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u4hAxi5b6o

George Michael is rolling in his grave over this.