Why is All the Hate Towards Russia and Not China?

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, Andre0720 said:

Might very well be because the Russians seem to have more success...

 

What can the Jews themselves do to minimize the hostility that they face? I gave a one word answer: 'Fail'. Because as long as you succeed, you are going to be hated.  https://www.youtube.com/shorts/49wAPLj9XBs

Thomas Sowell on Jew Hatred: Envy of Success Explained in Brian Lamb Interview

The Russians are more successful than the Chinese? Another report from Oppositeworld.

[Andre0720]

47 minutes ago, placeholder said:

The Russians are more successful than the Chinese? Another report from Oppositeworld.

Seem.

Anything in that word that you do not understand?

 

New condo owners... As an example...

In the Kamala, Kathu District, Phuket area, Russians have been a significant force in the foreign condo market, particularly in leasehold properties, with Russians dominating in terms of both units and value purchased. 

 

[placeholder]

31 minutes ago, Andre0720 said:

Seem.

Anything in that word that you do not understand?

 

New condo owners... As an example...

In the Kamala, Kathu District, Phuket area, Russians have been a significant force in the foreign condo market, particularly in leasehold properties, with Russians dominating in terms of both units and value purchased. 

 

What exactly do you think this proves? That Russia is more successful than China? That it's as successful as China?  I'm genuinely curious.

[transam]

13 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So you believe the hoax too right? No sense arguing, it's like arguing with a flat earther

You have argued with a flat earther, what about.......?  

[Dan O]

13 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So you believe the hoax too right? No sense arguing, it's like arguing with a flat earther

Stating the fact that it was started by Republicans has nothing to do with believing that its true.  Use your brain some times and learn to read and comprehend instead of trying to change what's written into some talking point that wasn't said just to promote your agenda.  Are you just another sheep marching in line behind Trump? 

[placeholder]

13 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So you believe the hoax too right? No sense arguing, it's like arguing with a flat earther

So you get nothing to offer against the fact that a committee headed by Senate Republicans concluded that Manafort worked with the Russians. To put it another way, you've got nothing.

[Yagoda]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

So you get nothing to offer against the fact that a committee headed by Senate Republicans concluded that Manafort worked with the Russians. To put it another way, you've got nothing.

Ive got sanity and critical thinking. Tell us the what the "work" was LOL

[Andre0720]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

What exactly do you think this proves? That Russia is more successful than China? That it's as successful as China?  I'm genuinely curious.

Again, what is it in the word 'seem' that you do not understand?

 

It does not mean that it proves anything. But many Thais believe so, as supported by many facts in property ownership. Might not be true. Same as the fact that they believe in Buddha. Might not be true.

[Purdey]

McCarthy was against all communists but focused on Russia. He destroyed many careers. It seems now McCarthyism had returned but now it's against everybody who is not in a cult. 

[stevenl]

19 minutes ago, Andre0720 said:

Again, what is it in the word 'seem' that you do not understand?

 

It does not mean that it proves anything. But many Thais believe so, as supported by many facts in property ownership. Might not be true. Same as the fact that they believe in Buddha. Might not be true.

What don't you understand about the title of the thread?

[candide]

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Thats fine, folks are entitled to beleive fantasy. Its healthier not to, but its your life, and you arent from the US so you wont be voting

Your usual lame deflection when you have nothing.... 🤣

 

Russian interference, including the role of  Manafort, is well documented in the GOP-led Senate committee report.

 

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us-senate-committee-concludes-russia-used-manafort-wikileaks-to-boost-trump-i-idUSKCN25E1UZ/

[Yagoda]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

Lame deflection. 😆

 

Russian interference, including the role of  Manafort, is well documented in the GOP-led Senate committee report.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf

Tell us what he did? You dont know?

[transam]

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us what he did? You dont know?

Sounds like, neither do you, as he quickly heads off to Google..........🤭

[candide]

33 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us what he did? You dont know?

Among others, he provided polling data to a Russian agent.

 

Do you believe the conclusions of the GOP-led Senate intelligence committee report of not? 

[placeholder]

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Ive got sanity and critical thinking. Tell us the what the "work" was LOL

Rather than go dig into the weeks here's how a Federal Judge assessed the Trump campaign russian connection

'In an order in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking access to the unredacted report, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said Barr's action caused him "to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller report in favor of President Trump."

Walton focused on Barr's initial statement — before the report was released in full — that Mueller's team did not find that anyone in the Trump campaign conspired with Russian efforts to meddle in the 2016 election. The judge said Barr left out the fact that the report identified contacts between members of the Trump campaign and people connected with the Russian government.'

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/federal-judge-blasts-barr-misleading-mueller-report-n1151076

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Rather than go dig into the weeks here's how a Federal Judge assessed the Trump campaign russian connection

'In an order in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking access to the unredacted report, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said Barr's action caused him "to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller report in favor of President Trump."

Walton focused on Barr's initial statement — before the report was released in full — that Mueller's team did not find that anyone in the Trump campaign conspired with Russian efforts to meddle in the 2016 election. The judge said Barr left out the fact that the report identified contacts between members of the Trump campaign and people connected with the Russian government.'

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/federal-judge-blasts-barr-misleading-mueller-report-n1151076

What facts did the judge recite?. Why dont you post the decision? What was the case about? Was that the holding of the case, or District Judge  dicta?

 

Have you ever read the Mueller report? How about the decision you refer to?

 

Of course you cant answer any of the foregoing, nor have you read either of the documents referred to.