Jump to content

Gaza Paramedics Shot ‘With Intent to Kill,’ Red Crescent Demands International Probe


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

 

With good reason, don't you think?

Hamas thinks so. As do you. You asked me what I think before then dismissed what I think so enough of the baiting. My views are already posted 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
On 4/8/2025 at 6:26 PM, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Nope . 

Going by facts .

Hamas regularly use ambulances as cover and to hide from the IDF and use ambulance as military vehicles .

  Ambulance then lose their protection from attack .

There may or may not have been terrorists in that actual ambulance , but because Hamas has previously used ambulances as military vehicles to transport its terrorists .

   You can understand the IDF not taking any chances  an regarding the ambulance as an enemy military vehicle  and treating it as such

 

Right, so they should immediately start shooting at the ambulances and continue for several minutes. And then check. And then lie about it.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

 

Right, so they should immediately start shooting at the ambulances and continue for several minutes. And then check. And then lie about it.

 

 

  War isn't very nice and people get killed .

A potential threat is kill or be killed .

Ask questions later 

  • Sad 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Where the lights of the ambulances in which the paramedics gunned down by the IDF were slaughtered illuminated or not?

 

Did the IDF lie about that or not?

 

Is the call by the Red Crescent for an international investigation into these killings reasonable or not?

 

 

 

 

“Where the lights of the ambulances in which the paramedics gunned down by the IDF were slaughtered illuminated or not?”

 

….. almost certainly, Hamas are very adept at making their deceptions and disguises seem authentic; when the terrorists dress as doctors, they always have a mandatory stethoscope and fake medical ID card.

 

“Did the IDF lie about that or not?”

 

…. probably; and that’s because of people like yourself that refer to Hamas terrorists as “Gazans” because you cannot bring yourselves to call them what they really are, and that buy into every terrorist deception because you want to believe the terrorists propaganda to satisfy your thinly veiled antisemitism.

 

 

“Is the call by the Red Crescent for an international investigation into these killings reasonable or not?”

 

…… How can an international investigation take place in Gaza without it being under the direct control of the terrorists of Hamas, and who would conduct it ? The Hamas affiliated UNWRA, the Hamas affiliated Palestinian Red Crescent, the institutionally antisemitic UN ? …. maybe Hezbollah could lend a hand; oh, wait a minute, I don’t think they’ve got many left 😬

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Makes no difference , Palestinians have previously used ambulances to transport their members and weapons .

  IDF shouldn't take any chances and view them as potential  enemy combatants and act accordingly . 

   Palestinians  commit war crimes by using ambulances to transport terrorists and these are the results 

That doesn’t explain the lies and burying the evidence.

 

What it is however is an excuse offered for a possible war crime.

 

An international investigation would be an opportunity to offer that excuse and any other evidence surrounding the accusation of a war crime.

 

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That doesn’t explain the lies and burying the evidence.

 

What it is however is an excuse offered for a possible war crime.

 

An international investigation would be an opportunity to offer that excuse and any other evidence surrounding the accusation of a war crime.

 

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.

 

 

Burying evidence? 

 

It was the IDF who informed the UN where the bodies were and they were buried because of the real possibility that dogs would eat them as has been happening with bodies in Gaza. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Utter nonsense.

 

Zero evidence has been provided of these Paramedics being Hamas terrorists in disguise.

 

The IDF didn’t ‘Probability about this slaughter of paramedics, they absolutely did lie.

 

An international investigation does not need to take place within Gaza. 

 

Can you please provide evidence of your repeated claim of The Red Crescent being affiliated to Hamas.

 

 

Zero evidence has been provided of these Paramedics being Hamas terrorists in disguise.

 

Patience.........

 

In the initial findings from its investigation of the incident, the military asserted that at least six of those killed had been posthumously identified as Hamas operatives. It has not yet named the operatives, and is expected to do so only once its probe is concluded.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/red-crescent-says-autopsies-show-slain-gaza-medics-were-shot-with-intent-to-kill/

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Peterphuket said:

And everyone seems to conveniently forget that it started opm7 October 2023, murder, rape and everything against humanity, all at the behest of Iran.


I doubt anybody forgets those heinous crimes.

 

They are however not part of the events under discussion.

 

Let’s be very clear, no heinous war crime is any justification for another.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Israel will never agree. Many things to hide.


Very clearly the IDF lied about the circumstances of the slaughter of these Paramedics and have yet to provide information on the one Paramedic who remains missing.

 

They, the IDF,  clearly lack any credibility to undertake an investigation or play any party in an investigation other than as subjects of an investigation into a probable war crime.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


I doubt anybody forgets those heinous crimes.

 

They are however not part of the events under discussion.

 

Let’s be very clear, no heinous war crime is any justification for another.

 

 

Why do you think the IDF were there? Of course the hostages are part of the discussion. That's why the war is going on because the terrorists will not release them and carry on their war crimes daily using ambulances, hospitals and civilians as human shields. Sounds like you'd prefer to forget about those inconvinient facts.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
44 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


Very clearly the IDF lied about the circumstances of the slaughter of these Paramedics and have yet to provide information on the one Paramedic who remains missing.

 

They, the IDF,  clearly lack any credibility to undertake an investigation or play any party in an investigation other than as subjects of an investigation into a probable war crime.

 

 

 

Antisemitism from you once again; even more thinly veiled than usual.

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Very clearly the IDF lied about the circumstances of the slaughter of these Paramedics

 

Very clearly the IDF lied about the circumstances of the slaughter of these Terrorists

 

…. fixed it for you; you’re welcome

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

Extra edifying; many thanks for your intellectual input.

 

 

 

 


You’ve claimed The Red Crescent is ‘affiliated’ to Hamas.

 

Can please produce evidence of that ‘affiliation’.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

Very clearly the IDF lied about the circumstances of the slaughter of these Terrorists

 

…. fixed it for you; you’re welcome

 

 

Can you please provide evidence that the slaughtered paramedics were terrorists?

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


You’ve claimed The Red Crescent is ‘affiliated’ to Hamas.

 

Can please produce evidence of that ‘affiliation’.

 

 

 

 

All Palestinians in Gaza are affiliated to Hamas. Hamas are the legitimate government of these Palestinians; you don’t like that because it removes the validity of the overused and disingenuous slogan “innocent Palestinians” every time a terrorist disguised as a civilian or a medic is killed.

 

However, you have never offered an explanation as to how the IDF are supposed to recognise in a war, the difference between Hamas terrorists, and alleged innocent civilians when they continually disguise themselves as civilians, medics, teachers etc. How about the terrorists disguised as UNRWA workers, I notice you have not said anything about those “innocent Palestinians”

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

All Palestinians in Gaza are affiliated to Hamas. Hamas are the legitimate government of these Palestinians; you don’t like that because it removes the validity of the overused and disingenuous slogan “innocent Palestinians” every time a terrorist disguised as a civilian or a medic is killed.

 

However, you have never offered an explanation as to how the IDF are supposed to recognise in a war, the difference between Hamas terrorists, and alleged innocent civilians when they continually disguise themselves as civilians, medics, teachers etc. How about the terrorists disguised as UNRWA workers, I notice you have not said anything about those “innocent Palestinians”

 

 

 


‘Affiliation’ has a very specific definition.

 

Your tortured logic doesn’t come even close to that definition.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


‘Affiliation’ has a very specific definition.

 

Your tortured logic doesn’t come even close to that definition.

 

 

 

 

Oh look, you forgot to mention UNRWA once again, and their participation in the most barbaric atrocity in modern history; and their holding captive wounded and dying hostages in their facilities for Hamas. No Palestinian agency in Gaza can be trusted in any way, shape or form, they are all affiliated to Hamas.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Tubulat said:

If you are so boorish as to deny that, any discussion with you is pointless, therefore I am blocking you.


A personal attack and a flounce, all in one short sentence.


And all without addressing the point I made.

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

Antisemitism from you once again; even more thinly veiled than usual.

 

 

 

You can’t deal with an argument so you resort to your customary fall back of baseless slurs.

 

 

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...