Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's neither... just an excuse for lazy morons to game the system and claim nonsense. Western society should stop making up "conditions" that are not real... they are all just a figment of a section of society's imagination BS.

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
12 hours ago, atpeace said:

Another impolite copy and paste  of  articles  by you. Moderators why don't you stop this.  Just tell us your opinion and supply a link.  You can ruin a topic with endless copy and pasting that nobody reads.  

And how many take the effort to copy/paste/open the dead links?

No wonder that more copy/paste to the threads happen.

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 4/16/2025 at 6:44 PM, Red Phoenix said:

Stop Calling It Autism. Start Calling It Vaccine-Induced Encephalopathy 

Stop calling it any of the above. 

 

Start calling it 'YOU CHOSE THE WRONG PARENTS SYNDROME'. 

 

If you were born with quality genes life is GOOD 👍

 

I love living a healthy life, big thanks to mum and dad ❤️

 

  • Heart-broken 2
Posted
2 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Stop calling it any of the above. 

 

Start calling it 'YOU CHOSE THE WRONG PARENTS SYNDROME'. 

 

If you were born with quality genes life is GOOD 👍

 

I love living a healthy life, big thanks to mum and dad ❤️

 

Yep, I go along with this - healthy and strong DNA. Too many people with low-grade DNA are breeding, and so the cycle goes on and on.  Just look at our low-intellect royal family in the UK as an example of what happens when those with 'unhealthy' DNA are allowed to breed.

 

I've written this in a non-scientific manner, but I teach genetics at college level, so can 'spice it up' for those not on the spectrum 🙂

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Heart-broken 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Yep, I go along with this - healthy and strong DNA. Too many people with low-grade DNA are breeding, and so the cycle goes on and on.  Just look at our low-intellect royal family in the UK as an example of what happens when those with 'unhealthy' DNA are allowed to breed.

 

I've written this in a non-scientific manner, but I teach genetics at college level, so can 'spice it up' for those not on the spectrum 🙂

Thanks Simon, I agree.

 

Nice to interact with you again mate. 👍

 

Posted
29 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Yep, I go along with this - healthy and strong DNA. Too many people with low-grade DNA are breeding, and so the cycle goes on and on.  Just look at our low-intellect royal family in the UK as an example of what happens when those with 'unhealthy' DNA are allowed to breed.

 

I've written this in a non-scientific manner, but I teach genetics at college level, so can 'spice it up' for those not on the spectrum 🙂

What makes low grade DNA?, although it doesn't exist. Does this mean some people are worth more than others, better "humans" perhaps? Would this mean we should have our DNA tested before we "breed" with others? This would mean those that think this way actually think they are from a better "grade" of DNA than others, that they're somehow worth more as humans and those with this low grade need to be forced to not breed with others of better grade DNA, as their children could come out "wrong". 

 

This is the epitome of narcissism, actually thinking others are inferior because they didn't have parents of better DNA. I'm guessing good health means you had better parents, better DNA, and those with bad health had wrong DNA and it wasn't their lifestyle that hurt them? 

 

If you look at many of our world leaders, they are full on narcissists, thinking mainly of themselves and that they can do whatever they want and get away with it, as history has proven. This doesn't mean they have better DNA, but that their parents were also narcissists, neglectful, abusive or spoiling in their actions, which made them became narcissists themselves. 

 

People have been breeding for generations, and no one knows all about their family trees besides word of mouth, which isn't accurate and which can hide how their family history really was. Some think because their parents were okay, that all of their relatives must have been from "good" DNA also, not realizing they could have murderers, sociopaths and serial killers in their family history without ever knowing it. 

 

Funny how some here stick up for others of the same ilk, others who are prejudiced or racist but because they said something they liked, automatically they're okay.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

People have been breeding for generations, and no one knows all about their family trees besides word of mouth, which isn't accurate and which can hide how their family history really was. Some think because their parents were okay, that all of their relatives must have been from "good" DNA also, not realizing they could have murderers, sociopaths and serial killers in their family history without ever knowing it. 

Not to mention most people don't really know for certain if their dad was their biological dad.

Currently only the female line is sure.

 

I'm in favour of DNA testing at birth for all kids and their father being positively identified.

Doesn't even cost much these days.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...