Behind the facade of the Rightwing Moral Crusade

[Yagoda]

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

^This.

 

And note, while a number of our rightwing members have responded, not one has criticized this perverts actions.

why do we need to? Its easy, paedos get castrated or roasted on a griddle..

 

How about you?

 

Wonder what sex the victims were.

[Chomper Higgot]

6 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

As a news source the guardian has to be about as agenda driven, sanctimonious news source on the internet. It's less credible than Snopes.

 

I'm not debating the actual facts of this issue I just made a comment about how it was prevented by a very unbiased new source. I'm sure that there are far more less salacious details contained within the case. The guardian is the quintessential red meat for world liberals and communists alike

Let me get this right, you would be happier if the Guardian report put less emphasis on the perverts crimes and more how he’s kind to his mum?

 

Nah.

 

The report is of extremely serious crimes, which you have yet to condemn.

 

 

[Yagoda]

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

 

Is there a link between being an abuser and supporting and promoting a movement that encourages abuse?

[BangkokReady]

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Can you please explain what is dishonest about my post?

 

Of course, as it is so clearly dishonest.

 

Your post suggests that an abuser being "right wing" somehow reflects badly on "right wing people".

 

You ignore the fact that there are abusers within all ideologies.

 

Either left wing abusers also reflect badly on the left, making your point meaningless, or when it is a left wing person, it suddenly doesn't reflect on the political affiliation of the abuser, in which case you are being illogical and biased.  Either way, you are being dishonest.

[Yellowtail]

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

^This.

 

And note, while a number of our rightwing members have responded, not one has criticized this perverts actions.

Has he been convicted?

 

I say cut off the genitals and ten years prison for anyone convicted of rape.

 

If it's a child, I say cut off the genitals and life in prison for anyone convicted of raping a child. 

 

What say you? 

 

I am not exactly sure what "distribution of child sexual abuse material", constitutes, but if he is guilty, I think he should be sentenced at the severe end of the guidelines. 

[Chomper Higgot]

46 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Of course, as it is so clearly dishonest.

 

Your post suggests that an abuser being "right wing" somehow reflects badly on "right wing people".

 

You ignore the fact that there are abusers within all ideologies.

 

Either left wing abusers also reflect badly on the left, making your point meaningless, or when it is a left wing person, it suddenly doesn't reflect on the political affiliation of the abuser, in which case you are being illogical and biased.  Either way, you are being dishonest.

But which political party has been grandstanding these issues?

 

The rightwing fixation with perverts and accusing others of being a risk to children is a central plank of current rightwing messaging.

Again, is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

 

 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But which political party has been grandstanding these issues?

 

The rightwing fixation with perverts and accusing others of being a risk to children is a cereal plank of current rightwing messaging.

Again, is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

 

 

What issues? The only real issue related to child sex that is being grandstanded is the trans issue, and it's been both sides grandstanding. One for, the other against. 

[Chomper Higgot]

40 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Has he been convicted?

 

I say cut off the genitals and ten years prison for anyone convicted of rape.

 

If it's a child, I say cut off the genitals and life in prison for anyone convicted of raping a child. 

 

What say you? 

 

I am not exactly sure what "distribution of child sexual abuse material", constitutes, but if he is guilty, I think he should be sentenced at the severe end of the guidelines. 

The report states the charges come with a penalty of up to 30 years in prison on each count.

 

I think a few decades in prison would be a fitting sentence, and in the meantime keep him away from all children, including his own.

 

 

[NorthernRyland]

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Was he sniffing little girls?

Or taking showers with his daughter?

 

Probably used to smoke joints with Corn Pop at the pool.

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, NorthernRyland said:

 

Probably used to smoke joints with Corn Pop at the pool.

Smoking Corn Pop's joint more like

[Bkk Brian]

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The report states the charges come with a penalty of up to 30 years in prison on each count.

 

I think a few decades in prison would be a fitting sentence, and in the meantime keep him away from all children, including his own.

 

 

Not convicted yet then, aren't you always on about standing up for the full rights of the accused? Yet you've already labeled him.

 

"Yet another Republican caught committing heinous crimes."

 

Highly misleading Chomper. One to bookmark from you.

[EVENKEEL]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Can you please explain what is dishonest about my post?

 

I’ve linked to a factual report from a reliable and trusted news source.

 

 

As Bendejo points out Republican are continually grandstanding their position on child sexual abuse, imagined and real,  and yet have so many abusers in their own ranks.

 

Discussing this and why abusers might be drawn to and engaged in such messaging is a very valid concern.

 

Is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

I do understand it’s not something some wish to discuss.

 

 

I've come to expect more from you. This all you got?

[josephbloggs]

2 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

You talk like one person doing something means that anyone who happens to follow the same political ideology is in favour of that thing.  That's just silly.

Finally it dawns on you.

So that means we can now criticise Trump without being called a Biden-loving, men-in-women's-showers promoting, illegal immigrant supporting terrorism fan?


Welcome to the real world, I am glad you finally arrived.

[The Cyclist]

14 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I've come to expect more from you. This all you got?

 

Then I am afraid you are going to go through your asseannow life, extremely disappointed.

 

Mentalists really do walk amongst us.

[JackGats]

Peadohypocrisy has nothing to do with being right-wing or left-wing. It has to do with peadohysteria as a whole.

[Chomper Higgot]

19 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Then I am afraid you are going to go through your asseannow life, extremely disappointed.

 

Mentalists really do walk amongst us.

The subject is perverts in the party of moral crusaders.

 

 

[EVENKEEL]

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The subject is perverts in the party of moral crusaders.

 

 

Perverts everywhere. Quite the non story.

[The Cyclist]

19 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The subject is perverts in the party of moral crusaders.

 

Well reading the comments, he seems to have been in both parties.

 

Which puts you, and your OP in a bit of a quandary.

 

And perhaps reinforces, that perverts and their perversions are nothing to do with Politics or Political Parties.

 

Try not to struggle getting your head around that, I wouldn't like to see you suffering from an aneurism.

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

Finally it dawns on you.

 

What dawns on me? What on Earth are you talking about?

 

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

So that means we can now criticise Trump without being called a Biden-loving, men-in-women's-showers promoting, illegal immigrant supporting terrorism fan?

 

Who said you can't criticise Trump? Criticise whomever you want, as much as you want.

 

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

Welcome to the real world, I am glad you finally arrived.

 

What bizarre nonsensical comment. You sound unhinged.

[BangkokReady]

46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The subject is perverts in the party of moral crusaders.

 

What an odd choice of lies to tell.

 

Clearly the left are far more often styled as the "good guys" and the "moral crusaders".

 

The centre/right of centre are a lot more matter of fact.

 

Do you think that people will just beleive whatever nonsense you spew onto your keyboard?

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

I've come to expect more from you. This all you got?

 

He knows he's messed up and he's finding it hard to backtrack.

 

He knows the left are generally the "moral crusaders", and that there are more perverts on the left than on the right.

 

I wonder if he regrets starting this thread, as it's made him look even more stupid and dishonest than usual.

[josephbloggs]

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

He knows the left are generally the "moral crusaders", and that there are more perverts on the left than on the right.

Where do you come up with this rubbish?

[Yagoda]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But which political party has been grandstanding these issues?

Which political party has been encouraging these issues?

 

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The rightwing fixation with perverts and accusing others of being a risk to children is a central plank of current rightwing messaging.

The Socialist fixation with imaginary sexual worlds and celebration of perversion and mental illness as well as promoting it to children is a central plank of current woke Socialist messaging.

 

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Again, is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

 

Again, is their, for example, a link between childhood grooming and encouraging that abuse as an adult?

[BangkokReady]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But which political party has been grandstanding these issues?

 

Well, the left said "We want to trans your kids, we want male bodies in the private spaces of women and girls, and we want unlimited ideological access to your children", all under the guise of helping children.

 

The right then said, "No".

 

I think most would agree that the right has had a fairly mild response, given what the left wants.

 

So, no. Youre wrong.

 

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The rightwing fixation with perverts and accusing others of being a risk to children is a central plank of current rightwing messaging.

 

Not central, and certainly less than the left. So you're wrong again.

 

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Again, is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

 

Are you suggesting that the loony left's obsession with targeting children is hiding a desire to abuse those children?

[Yagoda]

5 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Where do you come up with this rubbish?

Well you dont see hairy dudes in aviators and naked except for a leather borat suit and an SS cap leading a fat guy wearing a leather muzzle at most Nascar races or July 4th celebrations. Not many purple hairs at football games either. 

[BangkokReady]

7 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Where do you come up with this rubbish?

 

These are the facts. If you don't like those facts, there isn't much you can do.

[newbee2022]

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yet another Republican caught committing heinous crimes.

 

And just check his online ‘username’.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/13/rj-may-south-carolina-child-sexual-abuse

Yeah, there are a lot of weirdos/criminals within the Republicans. As the tree so the fruit....🤓

[fredwiggy]

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

^This.

 

And note, while a number of our rightwing members have responded, not one has criticized this perverts actions.

When you're stuck on one side, no matter what that side has done, your hero worship, much like that with the Kardashians or P. Diddy, is hard to break. They can do no wrong, and what wrong they do is deflected away, and then they'll remind you of what the other side did. Both sides have problems. This is a man who's side means nothing. What he's done does.

[josephbloggs]

13 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

These are the facts. If you don't like those facts, there isn't much you can do.

It's an opinion, not a fact. And a very biased opinion at that,

[EVENKEEL]

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

^This.

 

And note, while a number of our rightwing members have responded, not one has criticized this perverts actions.

I'm sure you thought this would be a home run, conservative bashing thread. Instead you get meh, so what. 55555