Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Let's see now how Saudi - Qatar - Russia and China respond

They won't other than diplomatically. China will kick up a fuss because of the oil.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

President Trump could potentially be impeached for bombing Iran without congressional approval, as it may violate the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the sole power to declare war (Article I, Section 8). The War Powers Resolution of 1973 further requires presidential notification to Congress within 48 hours of military action and limits such actions to 60-90 days without congressional authorization.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 minute ago, WorriedNoodle said:

as it may violate the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the

Good thing congress is controlled by republicans. Hes getting all the most important things out of the way before midterms

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Anyone with a brain knew that Trump was gonna attack this weekend

Yep. the two weeks of which there were many comments about from the usual suspects on here was a diversion. No way he could give them two weeks. As for those TACO commenters now's your chance to admit you were wrong. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, WorriedNoodle said:

President Trump could potentially be impeached for bombing Iran without congressional approval, as it may violate the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the sole power to declare war (Article I, Section 8). The War Powers Resolution of 1973 further requires presidential notification to Congress within 48 hours of military action and limits such actions to 60-90 days without congressional authorization.

 

Wouldn't thus include all the drone strikes by the last number of presidents ?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, expat_4_life said:

I don't know how I could be more angry right now, what a disaster.
Trump just shattered his political coalition ... 

There are so many risks, a broader regional conflict, global oil market chaos not to mention dragging the likes of the other global superpowers into taking sides with Iran.


Americans don't want another forever war, but here we go. Buckle up. 👿

That IS the silver lining - MAGA is going to splinter in half, mouths foaming and spitting venom at each other. Time to invest in popcorn.

 

BTW, off topic but speaking of popcorn:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLD_RDgTnFf/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Just now, jerrymahoney said:

I'm not arguing anything: Just again stating that there has been no confirmation that those bombs were used. 

Sure mate. Then why don't you tell us what type of bomb, other than a tactical nuke, could take out (possibly, we still don't knowhow effective these hits were) the heavily fortified enrichment facility buried 80-90 metres under a mountain and protected by rock and UHPC. Any ides?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Tug said:

I’m of a mind that it was a blunder to kill the nuclear agreement with Iran I just don’t think we would be here now,with that being said this is trumps war pure and simple he put the inevitable direction to this conclusion (I’m sorry I’m not expressing that in a more articulate manner) this is the result I wish it was otherwise….bombing a nation tends to unify that nation.ah well I hope it’s over with quickly and successfully.

 

I believe the problem is there never was a nuclear agreement, just the framework:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_nuclear_deal_framework#:~:text=The Iran nuclear deal framework,plus Germany) and the European

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, phetphet said:

So Trump bombs another country, then states, "Now is the time for peace." I wonder if the Iranians feel the same way.


They probably should, lest they get properly spanked. That shyster regime doesn’t speak for Iranians btw. 

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

The NY Times quotes sources that B-2 bombers were involved in the attacks but they do not say whether the big bunker-buster bombs were dropped.

 

42 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

How long before the US or the US's overseas interests are attacked?

 

History would ask, should US tourists and expats be worried about their safety?

 

43 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

How long before the US or the US's overseas interests are attacked?

 

History would ask, should US tourists and expats be worried about their safety?

US military dependents were advised to move away from some bases already so a heightened state of alert certainly.

Posted
2 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Closing the Strait of Hormuz will never happen with 2 carrier groups in the region.

I hope they have sunk their navy and submarines,I don’t know how competent they are but they might get lucky we do know they are willing to sacrifice their lives for their country/religon.btw I agree with you  2 carrier task forces !!that’s a lot of wip ass delivered by professional competent people.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Sure mate. Then why don't you tell us what type of bomb, other than a tactical nuke, could take out (possibly, we still don't knowhow effective these hits were) the heavily fortified enrichment facility buried 80-90 metres under a mountain and protected by rock and UHPC. Any ides?

image.png.3d953f03c4f74e12c264d60fa3733abe.png

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...