Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not sure how serious this charge is for ordinary Thais. She obviously said the army commander was on the opposite side of the political spectrum (i.e, not a Pheu Thai supporter), but language that critics argue undermines national sovereignty, the military, and the people of Thailand doesn't involve the whole of the military or the entire population of Thailand, let alone sovereignty. Sounds like making mountains out of molehills. Further, it was a private call, so whoever made an audio copy and released it should be let go as untrustworthy.

  • Thumbs Up 4
  • Thumbs Down 7
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Reminder of forum rule 4. You will not express disrespect of the King of Thailand or any member of the Thai royal family whether living or deceased. You will not criticize the monarchy as an institution. Speculation, comments or discussion of either a political or personal nature are not allowed when discussing His Majesty The King of Thailand or the Thai royal family. You will not link to or discuss any website which contravenes this rule.To breach this rule is a serious issue that will result in suspension or possible removal from the  forum.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, ChipButty said:

That family should just be banned from politics, everything they do is just dodgy, 

Yes, as opposed to the others........:coffee1:

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

 

its obvious you do not read the news The full version was released by Hun Sen and if you do not know who he is,  he ruled Cambodia for almost four decades

Ruled? Not sure why you're using the past tense of the word.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
33 minutes ago, norsurin said:

This country never stop surprised me.Closed borders to Cambodia.. crime all over the country.

Scammers everywhere..and so on.The tourism going down and they still not get it 

100% 

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

A 7-2 vote could reasonably indicate serious consideration. If 2 members were not present that might explain the "unanimous" description without explaining any reason for absence.

The quorum for a ruling is 5 members.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, DezLez said:

The "unanimous" description referred to the acceptance of the petition and not the vote.

 

Exactly, it's just a step on the route to exoneration (again).

  • Thumbs Down 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...