Picture courtesy of Khaosod.

 

More than 60 MPs have petitioned the House Speaker to forward a case to the Constitutional Court seeking to end the parliamentary status of Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul and People’s Party leader Natthapong Ruengpanyawut, accusing them of striking a deal that undermines democratic principles.

 

The petition stems from a memorandum of agreement (MOA) reached during the 5 September prime ministerial vote, in which the People’s Party pledged to support Anutin’s candidacy in exchange for five conditions. Chief among them was a commitment to dissolve parliament within four months and to advance a referendum on constitutional reform.

 

Petitioners, believed to be largely from the Pheu Thai and Prachachart parties, argue the arrangement violates several constitutional provisions and the Organic Act on Political Parties. They claim it subjects MPs to the domination of another party, restricts their independence and amounts to a quid pro quo that benefits political factions rather than the public.

 

The MPs cite Article 114 of the Constitution, which requires legislators to act independently and in the public interest, and Article 164, which obliges the Cabinet to govern with integrity and transparency. They also point to Section 46 of the Organic Act, which forbids outside control of a political party’s activities.

 

“If the Bhumjaithai Party forms a government under these conditions, it effectively cedes control to the People’s Party,” the petition states, warning that such an arrangement risks misuse of parliamentary authority.

 

However, House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha has not yet signed the petition for submission to the court. His office said it was still verifying MPs’ signatures and the referral is now expected to be made on 8 September.

 

The petition follows last month’s Constitutional Court ruling that removed Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra from office, triggering the latest leadership contest. Bhumjaithai, which commands fewer than 150 MPs, lacked a parliamentary majority and relied on the People’s Party’s support to put Anutin forward.

 

Not all commentators support the move. Political analyst Pravit Rojanaphruk cautioned against relying on judicial channels to resolve political conflicts, arguing that such petitions risk placing power beyond democratic scrutiny.

 

The Constitutional Court has not yet indicated whether it will accept the case.

 

  Adapted by Asean Now from Khoasod 2025-09-07

 

 

 

But the PT MPs would have been happy for the PP to back them under the same conditions.... clowns, the lot of them 

What a pathetic bunch 😡

Here we go again how about just get on and govern the country idiots

2 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

They claim it subjects MPs to the domination of another party, restricts their independence and amounts to a quid pro quo that benefits political factions rather than the public.

 

 

Otherwise known as a coalition? 

 

 

10 minutes ago, ozz1 said:

just get on and govern the country idiots

The country pretty much runs itself whether there's anyone keeping the store or not, seems to me.

As I wrote earlier.. there will be fake reasons found to dissolve tje Peopled Party, as they ate a threat for the elite and army in charge

3 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

As I wrote earlier.. there will be fake reasons found to dissolve tje Peopled Party, as they ate a threat for the elite and army in charge

They can only ban the executives, the MPs can simply carry on under another party name as they have done previously.

In this case it's only the leader,  Nattapong, who's facing accusations, and he's pretty useless imo, so no big loss.

However, I think this case will go nowhere. Bhumjaithai can argue the contract is not legally binding, they can do what they want in practice.

Sour grapes by PT. Shame on them.

14 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

More than 60 MPs have petitioned the House Speaker to forward a case to the Constitutional Court seeking to end the parliamentary status of Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul and People’s Party leader Natthapong Ruengpanyawut, accusing them of striking a deal that undermines democratic principles.

 

Thailand doesn't have any democratic principles, 

It is the world upside down in Thailand. There is a constitution written by people who always will stay in power. No changes are possible and every opportunity is used to bring to every move to court. But the real culprits get royal pardon and can flee the country, while others try to help to move forward will be hold back by a bunch of old conservative and outdated dinosaurs. Get rid of the current charter as soon as possible and write a good one 

Anutin Shrugs Off Pheu Thai’s Legal Challenge Over PM Role

 

Picture courtesy of Amarin TV

 

Newly appointed Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul remains unfazed by legal moves from some Pheu Thai MPs aiming to oust him from office. The buzz erupted after Bhumjaithai signed an agreement with the People’s Party, securing Anutin 311 votes in the House of Representatives. The PM received his royal appointment today amidst claims of party dominance and benefit exchange.

 

Anutin downplayed the petition submitted to House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, insisting it's within legal bounds. The Pheu Thai members question whether the memorandum of agreement between Bhumjaithai and the People’s Party breaches constitutional rules. Anutin rebutted by pointing out its similarity to Pheu Thai’s own previous manoeuvres with the People's Party, highlighting a breach of agreement by Pheu Thai after the 2023 elections.

 

The previous year’s agreement saga saw Pheu Thai initially backing Move Forward Party's then-leader Pita Limjaroenrat for PM. However, a surprise coalition with Palang Pracharath and Ruam Thai Sang Chart emerged, led by the likes of Prawit "Uncle Pom" Wongsuwan and Prayut "Uncle Tu" Chan-o-cha, shifting the political winds dramatically.

 

Anutin remained calm under scrutiny, suggesting this issue is a matter for Pheu Thai to address. Under the signed MOA with the People’s Party, Anutin pledged to dissolve the House in four months post-policy statement and support a referendum on the junta-designed 2017 constitution. This bold move could reshape Thai politics, pending public support.

 

As Anutin steps into his role, the political landscape faces potential shifts, echoing throughout the region. The coming months promise a whirlwind of political manoeuvres and public decisions, awaiting the implications of a potential constitutional overhaul.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Thai Newsroom 2025-09-08

 

 

21 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

More than 60 MPs have petitioned the House Speaker to forward a case to the Constitutional Court seeking to end the parliamentary status of Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul and People’s Party leader Natthapong Ruengpanyawut, accusing them of striking a deal that undermines democratic principles.

That's like the kettle calling the pot black

23 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Petitioners, believed to be largely from the Pheu Thai and Prachachart parties, argue the arrangement violates several constitutional provisions and the Organic Act on Political Parties. They claim it subjects MPs to the domination of another party

Whereas, on the other hand, the Pheu Thai MPs are under the domination of a private citizen with fragile health who sometimes wears neck braces... 

Next, PP to be dissolved for breaking laws while Anutin gets on with ruling the country. 

A nice coup.

Just now, Purdey said:

Next, PP to be dissolved for breaking laws while Anutin gets on with ruling the country. 

A nice coup.

 

Agree.....no way, having got this far, is he going to call a GE.

He was wearing a disc shaped badge on his left lapel the day he was voted in as PM. Now, in the OP photo it is shown above his medal rack.

 

Is it a Tuit? As in "I will do it when I get a round Tuit"?