4 minutes ago, flexomike said:

Damn Tug, Biden didn't use the office to enrich himself?

Not that I’m aware of certainly not getting guilded 747s that get fixed on the taxpayers dime certainly not selling influence with the crypto scam.guess hes graduated from hawking cartoons gold bibles and sneakers ehh?

37 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

The Hunter laptop says different!

What do the hunter biden laptop says ? 

 

i do not doubt Hunter Biden was there to make sure Ukraine would contribute to USA interests and taking part of corruption to succeed because that’s how it works. Foreign affairs is dirty business and no country or government have clean hands. 

 

But what do we really know about it? Distractions at its best again

22 minutes ago, Hummin said:

But what do we really know about it?

The forum left know zero about it. There has been no discussion of this whole event, it used to be a bannable offence to even suggest the authenticity of said item. Factual posters were ordered to pay attention to the "more intellectual" members who had "done their research properly" ie laptop denier Rachel Maddow consumers.

Not surprised Tug and others find it all boring. It upends the last decade of their postings.

1 minute ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The forum left know zero about it. There has been no discussion of this whole event, it used to be a bannable offence to even suggest the authenticity of said item. Factual posters were ordered to pay attention to the "more intellectual" members who had "done their research properly" ie laptop denier Rachel Maddow consumers.

Not surprised Tug and others find it all boring. It upends the last decade of their postings.

Well you can be either smart about it and say we know F all, or try to be smart! 

 

What we know, foreign affairs is dirty business and we can create plausible scenarios, or just believe what we want to believe out if convenient reasons. 

 

It is not like all the money that went to Irak, didn’t end up in wrong hands, ? 

7 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

What we know, foreign affairs is dirty business and we can create plausible scenarios, or just believe what we want to believe out if convenient reasons. 

Once again this contradicts established forum narratives.

 

I was assured to the point of forced holidays that only Trunp ever expected gains through foreign aid. It was the Quid pro Quo hoax remember? The clowns impeached him for it. Foreign affairs = the US spaffing money willy nilly around the world out of the goodness of their hearts.

Or was that bs too?🤣

4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Once again this contradicts established forum narratives.

 

I was assured to the point of forced holidays that only Trunp ever expected gains through foreign aid. It was the Quid pro Quo hoax remember? The clowns impeached him for it. Foreign affairs = the US spaffing money willy nilly around the world out of the goodness of their hearts.

Or was that bs too?🤣

 

I believe some people truly believe they doing good, and certainly some people do benefits from the programs who needs, it, but bilateral deals involving aid, is also bribes to get resources and also sell technology and other goods to poor countries. It is a way around the normal corruption, call it clean corruption 

A better question much, much harder to answer is --

In what ways is Mr. Trump NOT a dangerous leader?

Of course, he's a gift that keeps on giving to those that wish the United States to decline as spectacularly and rapidly as possible.