With the greatest (dis) respect when I think of the last US presidential election, I see an oversized deranged bully against a midget poison dwarf; if the democrats have any sense which is debatable, they should keep the loser well away from another election.

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Please be done.

It was unfair to her that her one shot came in the way that it did and the blame for that lies with Joe Biden.

But life isn't fair and neither is politics.

She's damaged goods.

Yeah there are historical cases where that hasn't mattered but the democrats going forward have better choices.

“better choices “

 

Such as?

 

Jasmine Crockett?  Someone found one of her eyelashes at Popeyes Chicken 

 

 

Hell Yea ... please run, you GO GIRL

 

Don't let them racist, sexist bastards stop you, BE ALL YOU CAN BE

 

The world needs a laugh.   Who would think anyone could possibly be dumber than Bush, Biden or even Quayle on the campaign trail   

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Neither of those two. I will hold off going further until after 2016 election. We don't even know yet if there will be a real election in 16. Much speculation about 18 is very premature.

7 years ago

Jasmine Crockett, FTW

12 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Jasmine Crockett, FTW

You’re quite the comedian.

2 hours ago, thesetat said:

I agreee... I hope she runs again and gives the WH another 4 years with Republicans by losing again. 

Well the East Wing is gone already.

What makes you think there will be a White House left in 2028 ?

 

You get one shot at the title, champ.  Leave it as it is.

 

Personally I lost all respect for her at the Kavanaugh hearings: her, Corey Booker and Klobuchar.  The GOP goons had them crapping their pants.  Three US senators who came off as dumber than the three stooges at  the Red Shirt meetings.  These hearings are one of the very few times us outsiders get to see these people at work, as opposed to campaign presentations, talking head appearances etc.  Grade: F

 

She's damaged goods. No way she'll be the candidate for the Democrats.

2 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Are you drunk? 

Time traveler?

35 minutes ago, Jim Blue said:

Well the East Wing is gone already.

and it's going to be rebuilt.

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings, or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

8 minutes ago, stevenl said:

She's damaged goods. No way she'll be the candidate for the Democrats.

She's an idiot and typical of most Democrats at the top of the party. They have nothing other than attacking Trump and their radical 'progressive' woke left agenda which was fully rejected at the last election.

1 hour ago, KhaoHom said:

And the better choices are whom precisely? 😆😂🤣😭

A possible scenario.

 

The Dem candidates will be Gavin "The Grifter" Newsome, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Harris.  Newsome will win the nomination.  However, he will have to abandon his nomination when he accidently slips in the bathroom on his dripping hair gel.  Due to a severe head injury, the DNC will again install Kamala as the nominee.  Just a hypothetical scenario mind you 😉 

2 hours ago, novacova said:

You’re quite the comedian.

 

Why's that then?

I thought Trump had decided seeing as he's already been voted President theres no need for any more elections.

Trump for 2028!

 

Eric.

4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

She's an idiot and typical of most Democrats at the top of the party. They have nothing other than attacking Trump and their radical 'progressive' woke left agenda which was fully rejected at the last election.

The problem for the US is that there's not enough radical progressive politicians. What people on here call radical progressive is centralist at most.

2 hours ago, Bannoi said:

I thought Trump had decided seeing as he's already been voted President theres no need for any more elections.

It certainly looks like that.

It's hard to imagine Trump ever leaving the white house voluntarily.

While alive.

He's on a path now to be dear leader for life.

But he's old and mentally and physically ill, so the for life part is key.

48 minutes ago, stevenl said:

The problem for the US is that there's not enough radical progressive politicians. What people on here call radical progressive is centralist at most.

Men in women's sports isn't centrist by a long way. Neither is protecting people who are in the country illegally.

I'm sure Harris will be in the primaries.  And then like the 2024 primaries, she'll lose...badly.  AOC will probably kick Harris' butt in the primaries.  If New York's Mamdani is any example of what is to come, Democrat voters are going to support the most radical candidates in their party.  Kamala Harris is milquetoast.  I expect to see AOC and Gavin Newsom in the running and holding sway with the majority of Democrat voters. 

8 hours ago, blaze master said:

Yesssssssssssss. Please run. Please.

I promise I will quit the forum if she becomes the next candidate. Enough with the noise as it is today, oh well, we will see, I cant really believe they will get her a 2. chance 

20 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

t's hard to imagine Trump ever leaving the white house voluntarily.

The same thing was said during his first term.  Joe Biden - not Donald Trump - was the 46th President.  Someone else will be the 48th president.  It will not be Trump, even though Steve Bannon is trolling the Democrats with "Trump 2028."  

33 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Men in women's sports isn't centrist by a long way. Neither is protecting people who are in the country illegally.

So?

26 minutes ago, connda said:

The same thing was said during his first term.  Joe Biden - not Donald Trump - was the 46th President.  Someone else will be the 48th president.  It will not be Trump, even though Steve Bannon is trolling the Democrats with "Trump 2028."  

You don't know that.

There is nothing in the constitution about him not running in the primaries.

Then it would be up to the friendly supreme court on what happens next.

If he continues to seize one man power, there won't a real election in 2018 anyway, similar to Russia and Hungary.

Also he could be a Putin and have Vance run and then just stay in the white house and act as president anyway.

She flip-flopped one too many times (not run again, run for Governor of California, deny it, now wanting to run again), so, no, she's probably not a suitable candidate. That is unless the field of candidates is so weak that, at least, her popularity may be helpful with her candidacy.

10 hours ago, Bacon1 said:

and indicating that the idea of a woman occupying the White House is “inevitable.”

Lets hope that is just the idea that is inevitable, not the reality.

10 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

If he continues to seize one man power, there won't a real election in 2018

Apart from being democratically elected - twice - Trump has not "seized" power in any way.

12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

You don't know that.

There is nothing in the constitution about him not running in the primaries.

Then it would be up to the friendly supreme court on what happens next.

If he continues to seize one man power, there won't a real election in 2018 anyway, similar to Russia and Hungary.

Also he could be a Putin and have Vance run and then just stay in the white house and act as president anyway.

 

How many years has it been since you've looked at a calendar?

4 minutes ago, Smokin Joe said:

 

How many years has it been since you've looked at a calendar?

You didn't think it would be a typo?