2 hours ago, Hummin said:

AI got some answer for you

In 2026, psychological and evolutionary research suggests that this pattern is often driven by a combination of subconscious social dynamics and internal self-worth. While specific preferences vary, several recurring themes explain why some intelligent men repeatedly choose "troubled" or less intelligent younger partners:

1. The Savior Complex (White Knight Syndrome)

Highly capable or intelligent men may suffer from a savior complex, where their self-worth is tied to "fixing" others.

Need to be Indispensable: They may feel secure only when they are the primary "problem-solver" in a partner's life.

Vulnerability as Attraction: They are often subconsciously drawn to "birds with broken wings"—people in distress or toxic situations—because it fulfills a compulsion to rescue.

Parentification Roots: This behavior often stems from childhood experiences where they were forced to take on adult responsibilities early on, leading them to associate love with caretaking.

2. Masculinity and Social Comparison

Research indicates that many men feel a threat to their masculinity when their partner outshines them in areas they value, such as intelligence.

Psychological Distance: While men may admire intelligent women from afar, they are less attracted to them in close, real-life proximity if they feel "outsmarted".

Diminished Self-Esteem: Being outperformed by a partner can lead to a drop in implicit self-esteem, causing some men to subconsciously seek partners who do not challenge their intellectual dominance.

3. Evolutionary and Social Factors

Reproductive Fitness: From an evolutionary standpoint, men often prioritize youth and health—signals of fertility—over status or intelligence.

Complementary Deficits: Some intelligent men may lack social or emotional skills. They might seek partners who cover these "deficits"—someone who is emotionally expressive or socially fluid—rather than someone who matches them intellectually.

Control and Predictability: Some men may choose less intelligent partners because they feel such partners are easier to lead or control, reducing the likelihood of conflict or complex intellectual power struggles.

4. Overthinking and "Analysis Paralysis"

Intelligent individuals are prone to self-doubt and over-analysis. A partner who is less analytical can provide a "break" from their internal noise, offering a simpler, more direct emotional connection that doesn't require constant intellectual processing.

Then I asked about the control factor?

In 2026, research into relationship dynamics highlights that men who prioritize control often specifically seek out younger, "troubled," or less intellectually assertive partners to maintain a power imbalance.

In relationships where a desire for control is present, various factors can contribute to the dynamics between partners. Research suggests that an imbalance of power can be a significant element in certain relationships.

Some individuals may seek partners with less life experience or who are in a less established phase of life, which can sometimes create or reinforce a power difference within the relationship. This difference in experience or position can make one partner more susceptible to influence.

It's important to understand that a desire for control in a relationship often stems from internal factors such as insecurity rather than confidence. Such insecurities can manifest as a need to maintain strict control to prevent perceived threats to the relationship or one's own ego.

Relationships involving power imbalances can also be linked to situations where one partner is in a vulnerable state, whether emotionally, psychologically, or due to external circumstances. In such cases, one partner might seek to increase reliance on them, sometimes by limiting connections to external support systems like friends and family.

Understanding the dynamics of power and control in relationships is crucial for identifying potentially unhealthy patterns. Relationships thrive on mutual respect and equality, and imbalances of power can be detrimental to the well-being of both partners

I like quiet women

No poot mahk!

Yesterday I took Phuket Girl to task again about going to the beach with this 63 year old for hours.

So she said send me money, I'll move out of here. So I said how do I know you won't secretly still meet this guy, come to CM. To which she again replied, no she wants to stay in Phuket til 9th, to vote. When I protested I said I'd pay for your trip to go vote, so it can't be the vote, she confessed "I have new friends now". I said who? She says she met this girl, whom she thinks she can go have a good time with. She said "I think I'm happy". So she's really loving it in Phuket, going to the beach meeting people, making new friends. And it's not just the vote, she wants to stay there because she loves it.

I told her, but why do you have to go to the beach with the 63 year old. So she said, she will go alone from now on, and call a grab to go there.

So yah, my only options are to go to Phuket myself, or to send 30000 baht to set her up in a condo until 9th Feb. Or to walk away.

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

I was talking about first impressions of Strawberry. Obviously we only met once and that's all I can go on. She seems like a person of integrity. Of course it could all be fake, but that was the first impression she gave off.

Anyway, it's all irrelevant. I didn't feel anything with her. All that intelligent conversation bores me to death. It was nothing like with Phuket Girl, who within 45 minutes was red hot on top of you. With Strawberry blonde I'd have to go on God knows how many dates, fend off God knows how many other competitors. And besides, I already had a beautiful Caucasian woman for 23 years, and another for 12 years before that. I want someone from SE Asia.

Strawberry blonde, whilst an attractive woman with a pleasing face, is very skinny, all skin and bones, tall, I can't imagine she'd bring it in the bedroom. Sure, it's plesant conversation to go to nice places with someone like this. But that's it. I'm not looking for a mere breakfast or dinner companion or someone to just walk in the park.

That's not what Phuket Girl was, she was all in within 45 minutes of meeting, it was a roller coaster of excitement. A tsunami of oxytocin.

Strawberry blonde felt tame and vanilla by comparison. I didn't feel much. Only one time in the cafe, when she bunched her hair up for a longer period in the sun, that lovely strawberry blonde hair. I felt something fleeting akin to attraction. But again, nothing like with Phuket Girl, who ingnites appetites unlike anything Strawberry blonde manages.

If you want a girl on top of you after 45 minutes, that's what you go for. Forget about a relationship and know this is how she is with others before you. She's proven that all along. If you want a dummy that's just a body, that's what you go for. Intelligent women are a blessing, especially if they're attractive and loyal. That's the best a man can hope for.

There are countless bubble heads around that fall for BS easily. The smarter ones don't, as they're usually more independent.

Look at what you just said. Sex is first and foremost on your mind, as we've seen all along, so just be what you are. There are girls out there that money will buy, and it's never a good thing to take advantage of a decent woman if all you want is sex. That's a user mentality and is best reserved for girls who are also users. You have no idea how a woman will be in the bedroom until it happens. The shyest , most demure can be wild. The ones who are hot looking sometimes are so full of themselves that they aren't givers.

Again, look at yourself and what would be a better fit. A bimbo that doesn't talk much, like most Thais that can't speak much English, or a smart, with it woman that will challenge you in all respects.

Just now, fredwiggy said:

Intelligent women are a blessing, especially if they're attractive and loyal. That's the best a man can hope for.

Well, it was nice to sit there and talk with her initially. But after 4 hours I gotta tell you, all her talking started to grate on me.

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

never a good thing to take advantage of a decent woman if all you want is sex.

I don't just want sex. I want everything else as well. But what good is all this endless conversation if you're not really attracted to her? It's useless.

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

I was talking about first impressions of Strawberry. Obviously we only met once and that's all I can go on. She seems like a person of integrity. Of course it could all be fake, but that was the first impression she gave off.

Anyway, it's all irrelevant. I didn't feel anything with her. All that intelligent conversation bores me to death. It was nothing like with Phuket Girl, who within 45 minutes was red hot on top of you. With Strawberry blonde I'd have to go on God knows how many dates, fend off God knows how many other competitors. And besides, I already had a beautiful Caucasian woman for 23 years, and another for 12 years before that. I want someone from SE Asia.

Strawberry blonde, whilst an attractive woman with a pleasing face, is very skinny, all skin and bones, tall, I can't imagine she'd bring it in the bedroom. Sure, it's plesant conversation to go to nice places with someone like this. But that's it. I'm not looking for a mere breakfast or dinner companion or someone to just walk in the park.

That's not what Phuket Girl was, she was all in within 45 minutes of meeting, it was a roller coaster of excitement. A tsunami of oxytocin.

Strawberry blonde felt tame and vanilla by comparison. I didn't feel much. Only one time in the cafe, when she bunched her hair up for a longer period in the sun, that lovely strawberry blonde hair. I felt something fleeting akin to attraction. But again, nothing like with Phuket Girl, who ingnites appetites unlike anything Strawberry blonde manages.

Translation:

After I paid for coffee and snacks she said she wants to be friends.

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Well, it was nice to sit there and talk with her initially. But after 4 hours I gotta tell you, all her talking started to grate on me.

I don't just want sex. I want everything else as well. But what good is all this endless conversation if you're not really attracted to her? It's useless.

Communication is one of the most important things in a relationship, as it comes with trust and honesty. No talk, no relationship. Like I said, you either have it all, or get bored with a one sided thing. She will also.

3 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Translation:

After I paid for coffee and snacks she said she wants to be friends.

No, she was already talking about our second date on our 1st date, which is a clear indication she has interest. As is the fact she gave me a full 4 hours for the first date, despite her being always busy with work.

I have good chances with her. But I'm really after an oxytocin tsunami now. Not endless conversation. Phuket Girl has ruined me for other women.

2 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Communication is one of the most important things in a relationship, as it comes with trust and honesty. No talk, no relationship. Like I said, you either have it all, or get bored with a one sided thing. She will also.

Yes, but there's also such a thing as too much communication. I learnt things I wasn't particularly interested in. It was one sided, all polite clever conversation, almost no physicality. She's too intellectual for me. I need the thrill of physical communication. Verbal communication gets old quickly.

8 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

No, she was already talking about our second date on our 1st date, which is a clear indication she has interest. As is the fact she gave me a full 4 hours for the first date, despite her being always busy with work.

I have good chances with her. But I'm really after an oxytocin tsunami now. Not endless conversation. Phuket Girl has ruined me for other women.

At least you know what you want.

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Yes, but there's also such a thing as too much communication. I learnt things I wasn't particularly interested in. It was one sided, all polite clever conversation, almost no physicality. She's too intellectual for me. I need the thrill of physical communication. Verbal communication gets old quickly.

Some men are intimidated by smart women, so choose ones not too bright. That's all about sex, as again, communication is how a relationship lasts. Sex gets routine for both sides after the initial excitement wears off, and what do you have left? Staring at phones and watching Korean series or looking elsewhere for that excitement which never lasts forever.

There is never such a thing as too much communication unless it's all one sided. That's where chemistry and like ideals and plans comes in.

"Physical Communication" is just sex, and doesn't last but a few minutes most of the time. Holding, talking, sharing scenery or a movie, most anything together is what makes up 95% of relationships. If all you have is the 5%, you're lost from the start. Many end up as roommates because of this. Excitement doesn't only come from sex but talking on an equal level. Again, best to stick with bimbos that are just looking for material things if you don't want a challenge.

Just now, fredwiggy said:

Some men are intimidated by smart women, so choose ones not too bright. That's all about sex, as again, communication is how a relationship lasts. Sex gets routine for both sides after the initial excitement wears off, and what do you have left? Staring at phones and watching Korean series or looking elsewhere for that excitement which never lasts forever.

Actually he made a whole thread about it and now he changed his mind

https://aseannow.com/topic/1334045-thai-girl-is-almost-perfect-but-are-these-serious-problems/page/6/

2 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Actually he made a whole thread about it and now he changed his mind

https://aseannow.com/topic/1334045-thai-girl-is-almost-perfect-but-are-these-serious-problems/page/6/

Time heals all wounds, and tells more . History is revealed, and compatibility either falters or endures. Of course if you want to just be a player, go with the players.

51 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

No poot mahk!

😁 dont we all ? not easy to find at once they go quiet, you know there is something seriously wrong ! cant have someone ticking all the boxes. to my surprise, befriending a woman especially a thai woman, with no intention of making a relationship was the best investment I have done in life.

Yes those who makes you dizzy and gives you great sex day and night is great, for awhile.

So are you married or not? you got a kid right ?

I recommend Udon and Nong Khai for woman hunting. Nicer people than elsewhere.

33 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

I recommend Udon and Nong Khai for woman hunting. Nicer people than elsewhere.

I recommend Minneapolis

41 minutes ago, Celsius said:

I recommend Minneapolis

I recommend being yourself, and understanding how you really are and what fits you. Like I mentioned before, decent women, and men, do not deserve to be taken advantage of, used or abused. Players should stick with players, and leave the decent ones to find each other, and be content, while the players drive each other crazy.

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

That's all about sex, as again, communication is how a relationship lasts.

You're confusing two things, sex and love. When I say I want the Oxytocin rush, that refers to love, that feeling when you wake up with a woman you truly desire, and yes want to have sex with, and the sex was frequent and good, but it was not about sex. It was about waking up entangled with a beautiful woman who reciprocated all of that love without reserve.

Sex and love trigger fundamentally different chemicals in the brain. The latter triggers oxytocin, that's what really has you in a haze of romantic fire.

Now, yes, of course this oxytocin tsunami abates, and becomes less, however, it's very important. Because only if you are truly attracted to someone and want to have sex with them, will this oxytocin experience be available, and only if that is the case do you really have a chance to have something lasting that is worth having. It takes both people to be attracted, to accept the unacceptable, the dark side of the other, which we all have.

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

Sex gets routine for both sides after the initial excitement wears off, and what do you have left? Staring at phones and watching Korean series or looking elsewhere for that excitement which never lasts forever.

Yes, the novelty of sex and the oxytocin rush wear off, like I said, but you still are left with a person you're truly attracted to, and therefore can accept their dark sides. If you never had that, then making the compromises to accept their dark side becomes almost impossible and very hard to do. You have to be attracted to them.

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

There is never such a thing as too much communication unless it's all one sided. That's where chemistry and like ideals and plans comes in.

You can communicate like the love child of Barack Obama and Abraham Lincoln, if you're not attracted to her, and I mean truly attracted to her, if you're not having the oxytocin haze, then all that communication will be for nothing.

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

"Physical Communication" is just sex, and doesn't last but a few minutes most of the time. Holding, talking, sharing scenery or a movie, most anything together is what makes up 95% of relationships.

Sex doesn't last, but you know when you are attracted to someone, and if you had good sex, and the oxytocin haze, if you did then you can get through those times when you have to make compromises, life is less exciting. But if you're not attracted to them in the first place, if the oxytocin never kicked in, you're unlikely to make the sacrifices it takes to stay in it long term.

2 hours ago, Celsius said:

At least you know what you want.

It's one thing what you want. It's another what's available. As expected, Strawberry blonde confirmed the second date. So I'll meet and see where it goes, because she's available. However, what I really want is the oxytocin tsunami.

That doesn't mean I won't take whatever else is available.

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

You're confusing two things, sex and love. When I say I want the Oxytocin rush, that refers to love, that feeling when you wake up with a woman you truly desire, and yes want to have sex with, and the sex was frequent and good, but it was not about sex. It was about waking up entangled with a beautiful woman who reciprocated all of that love without reserve.

Sex and love trigger fundamentally different chemicals in the brain. The latter triggers oxytocin, that's what really has you in a haze of romantic fire.

Now, yes, of course this oxytocin tsunami abates, and becomes less, however, it's very important. Because only if you are truly attracted to someone and want to have sex with them, will this oxytocin experience be available, and only if that is the case do you really have a chance to have something lasting that is worth having. It takes both people to be attracted, to accept the unacceptable, the dark side of the other, which we all have.

Yes, the novelty of sex and the oxytocin rush wear off, like I said, but you still are left with a person you're truly attracted to, and therefore can accept their dark sides. If you never had that, then making the compromises to accept their dark side becomes almost impossible and very hard to do. You have to be attracted to them.

You can communicate like the love child of Barack Obama and Abraham Lincoln, if you're not attracted to her, and I mean truly attracted to her, if you're not having the oxytocin haze, then all that communication will be for nothing.

Sex doesn't last, but you know when you are attracted to someone, and if you had good sex, and the oxytocin haze, if you did then you can get through those times when you have to make compromises, life is less exciting. But if you're not attracted to them in the first place, if the oxytocin never kicked in, you're unlikely to make the sacrifices it takes to stay in it long term.

Where have I confused anything? What you said about the rush isn't love but filling a void with lust and actions. Love takes time, is a lot more permanent, and a bond between two people. Sex can help the bond, but the cement is always the communication and trust.

Sex is not love. Intimacy and emotional connection are two different things. Oxytocin helps to create that bond, but isn't the thing that keeps it together. One helps the other, a part of it, the bonding that happens during sex, but humans are still animals, and many separate sex from love and just are out to satisfy themselves first and foremost.

There are many couples who cannot have sex because of physical conditions but have created a bond between them that lasts. Countless that are old and sex isn't as important anymore but stay together for the same reasons.

If you aren't attracted to a woman, and just want sex, look elsewhere because again, a decent woman deserves more, as does a decent man. Attraction isn't a choice. Treating a partner as a partner is.

8 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

It's one thing what you want. It's another what's available. As expected, Strawberry blonde confirmed the second date. So I'll meet and see where it goes, because she's available. However, what I really want is the oxytocin tsunami.

That doesn't mean I won't take whatever else is available.

Did you read what you said earlier about this woman? That she talked too much, was too skinny, and there wasn't a real attraction. Why make a second date when you really want mostly sex? Let her find another who appreciates intelligence and how she looks. Going after a woman just because she has a vagina and is somewhat attractive to you is not right in any sense. I'm sure everyone here agrees with that.

3 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

What you said about the rush isn't love but filling a void with lust and actions

You're doing it again. You don't understand that sex triggers certain chemicals in the brain and love triggers other chemicals.

I'm not concerned with the rush related to sex, I'm more interested in the oxytocin rush which love provides.

5 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Love takes time, is a lot more permanent, and a bond between two people

You're talking about attachment. I was talking about the oxytocin rush which results when love kicks in. Different things.

5 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Sex can help the bond, but the cement is always the communication and trust.

No, the cement is the sex which leads to the feeling of love, oxytocin, which then enables you to accept the dark side of the other person. No amount of "communication" and trust would achieve that. You need to be attracted to her.

6 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Sex is not love.

However, sex leads to love. If you have sex repeatedly with someone, the odds that the oxytocin rush kicks in greatly increase.

7 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Intimacy and emotional connection are two different things. Oxytocin helps to create that bond, but isn't the thing that keeps it together.

Oxytocin helps to create the bond and helps to keep it together. Because only if you're attracted to her, if you had the oxytocin rush, would you make the sacrifices needed to keep it together. Without that, chances greatly decrease.

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

If you aren't attracted to a woman, and just want sex,

Again, you're not getting it. I don't just want sex. I want the oxytocin haze, that results from having sex and transitioning to love.

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Why make a second date when you really want mostly sex?

Like I said, you're not getting it. I don't want "mostly sex". I want the oxytocin haze, sex is just a precursor to that.

If Strawberry blonde and I have sex, the odds that the oxytocin rush arrives increase dramatically. Hence, I need to have sex with her, to see if I get the Oxytocin haze with her. I've had skinny women before, it's not a dealbreaker. It's not that I dislike how she looks, she's an attractive woman. It's just my preference is for a fuller figure but I'm not going to let that become any kind of dealbreaker.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

It was nothing like with Phuket Girl, who within 45 minutes was red hot on top of you. With Strawberry blonde I'd have to go on God knows how many dates, fend off God knows how many other competitors.

Cam taking himself out of the race with the Scarlet Spark because he knows he's out matched... instead he wants a pay4player he can jump in 45mins of meeting and delude himself its love.

8 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

You're doing it again. You don't understand that sex triggers certain chemicals in the brain and love triggers other chemicals.

I'm not concerned with the rush related to sex, I'm more interested in the oxytocin rush which love provides.

You're talking about attachment. I was talking about the oxytocin rush which results when love kicks in. Different things.

No, the cement is the sex which leads to the feeling of love, oxytocin, which then enables you to accept the dark side of the other person. No amount of "communication" and trust would achieve that. You need to be attracted to her.

However, sex leads to love. If you have sex repeatedly with someone, the odds that the oxytocin rush kicks in greatly increase.

Oxytocin helps to create the bond and helps to keep it together. Because only if you're attracted to her, if you had the oxytocin rush, would you make the sacrifices needed to keep it together. Without that, chances greatly decrease.

Again, you're not getting it. I don't just want sex. I want the oxytocin haze, that results from having sex and transitioning to love.

You're doing it again, assuming I don't understand about sex, chemicals, hormones and lust and relationships. Try not to be like that certain other few who assume about what others here know.

This topic I, along with others, have pointed out things about women, and this one in particular, which you found out were right on, yet you kept making excuses to be with her for what? Sex, period. You just said you dislike too much communication with this new girl, but earlier had said you used to lie in bed with PG talking for hours. If you took sex out of the equation, what would you have? Boredom eventually, because sex is again your main concern.

You have to admit to yourself what all of us here have seen all along, which you dismiss, even though it's what everyone is saying. You said you love her, and said she loves you, which are feelings that come after sex but aren't that real. Love takes a lot more time. The feelings from Oxytocin are sex related, and the bond that sex makes are again part of what love will be, but you take that sex away and what do you have?Sex is not the cement but just one part of a relationship, and like i said, sex isn't the main reason to keep a relationship going but just a part that helps it along, and starts things out.

The amount of sex in a relationship can show how that relationship is going, or maybe not. Many people love sex, and have it with their partners because they don't cheat, and want sex. Especially the woman in that regard. Straying can mean the loss of finances or other things, so many stay.

If you want everything, you give , and accept, everything, which means the talking women do, and women talk a lot more than men in most relationships. Men a lot of the times do not know how to listen to their women, and it's one of the most important things a man can do, and a real reason the man gets more sex from his woman. Ignoring what she says will have her shutting down, giving in reluctantly or looking elsewhere for attention.

Every man knows exactly why they want sex from a woman. Some lie and BS their way into bed, and others earn the privilege. Some want a long lasting or permanent relationship with one woman, and others just want to play. You can't kid yourself. Talking to other women partly ruined what you had with PG, even though she wasn't one who's looking for real but cash first. If you really want one woman, she's the priority and not notches on a bedpost. A relationship or just playing around aren't the same.

19 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Like I said, you're not getting it. I don't want "mostly sex". I want the oxytocin haze, sex is just a precursor to that.

If Strawberry blonde and I have sex, the odds that the oxytocin rush arrives increase dramatically. Hence, I need to have sex with her, to see if I get the Oxytocin haze with her. I've had skinny women before, it's not a dealbreaker. It's not that I dislike how she looks, she's an attractive woman. It's just my preference is for a fuller figure but I'm not going to let that become any kind of dealbreaker.

If you are bored with her talking, which won't decrease but increase in time, you need to look elsewhere, as just having sex with a skinny, talkative western woman just to bed her isn't right in any respect.

You don't "need" to have sex with her to show she's the one. Attraction isn't a choice, and if it isn't there, there are others who might have it. Sex confuses everyone, especially the woman. Attachments are made, and if you don't like fully the sex you have with her and leave, you're just another that used her and the main reason many women think all men are pigs. This is one reason it's always best to avoid sex, if you're a real man, until you're both sure you both want it, and that comes with taking time to get to know each other outside the bedroom. Romance 100.

Your words........."Well, it was nice to sit there and talk with her initially. But after 4 hours I gotta tell you, all her talking started to grate on me"...........Question. is she a decent woman you want to hurt or one you just want to "see" if sex brings that bond, and there is a huge chance a bond won't be created, so where does that leave her?.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Yesterday I took Phuket Girl to task again about going to the beach with this 63 year old for hours.

So she said send me money, I'll move out of here. So I said how do I know you won't secretly still meet this guy, come to CM. To which she again replied, no she wants to stay in Phuket til 9th, to vote.

She'd keep the money - never move out.

Refuse to provide you any proof of the new accommodation and go radio silent.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

When I protested I said I'd pay for your trip to go vote, so it can't be the vote, she confessed "I have new friends now". I said who? She says she met this girl, whom she thinks she can go have a good time with.

Customers !!

She's not leaving Phuket unless you pay her to come to Chiang Mai...

There's too much opportunity in Phuket for her - looks like 30,000 baht per month is her going rate now - and thats how much it will ultimately cost you to see her in Chiang Mai.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

She said "I think I'm happy".

Has customers.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

So she's really loving it in Phuket, going to the beach meeting people, making new friends. And it's not just the vote, she wants to stay there because she loves it.

Because she getting plenty of customers from tinder down there.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I told her, but why do you have to go to the beach with the 63 year old. So she said, she will go alone from now on, and call a grab to go there.

LOL - utter bo!!ox - she'll go with whomever is paying.

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

So yah, my only options are to go to Phuket myself, or to send 30000 baht to set her up in a condo until 9th Feb. Or to walk away.

There's the bottom line again - Money.

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

yet you kept making excuses to be with her for what? Sex, period.

No, again you keep clinging to this nonsense. I've had plenty of sex, it's not "sex period". I want the oxytocin haze, sex is just a precursor to that. I don't see how this is hard to understand.

9 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

You just said you dislike too much communication with this new girl, but earlier had said you used to lie in bed with PG talking for hours.

Yes, I could lie on the bed with PG for hours. Because we HAD the oxytocin haze. That made it all possible. Everything is possible then, that's what I'm saying.

If I've had sex with Strawberry blonde and the Oxytocin kicks in I'll probably find her fascinating.

10 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

If you took sex out of the equation, what would you have? Boredom eventually, because sex is again your main concern.

Again, you're talking nonsense. You're not getting it. I'm telling you sex is not my main concern, it's the oxytocin rush, sex is just a precursor to it. It's not hard to understand.

11 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Love takes a lot more time.

No, you're talking about attachment, not love.

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

No, again you keep clinging to this nonsense. I've had plenty of sex, it's not "sex period". I want the oxytocin haze, sex is just a precursor to that. I don't see how this is hard to understand.

Yes, I could lie on the bed with PG for hours. Because we HAD the oxytocin haze. That made it all possible. Everything is possible then, that's what I'm saying.

If I've had sex with Strawberry blonde and the Oxytocin kicks in I'll probably find her fascinating.

Again, you're talking nonsense. You're not getting it. I'm telling you sex is not my main concern, it's the oxytocin rush, sex is just a precursor to it. It's not hard to understand.

No, you're talking about attachment, not love.

Fred is always the expert on everything.

4 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

No, you're talking about attachment, not love.

Correct. Love takes 1 to 2 weeks.

She wants oxytocin too. It's called money.

Anyhoo in previous threads you claimed you like skinny girls. What gives?