48 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

There is no evidence of the shooter calling her a "fu*king bit*h" after he shot her, this is a lie that all the Trump-obsessed haters are regurgitating.

There maybe 2 AH's then...............😒

14 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Through his hate-filled speeches, Trump has dehumanized protesters/Democrats, lowering the threshold for people to resort to shooting.

We saw the same pattern in Nazi Germany, where Hitler dehumanized Jewish people, removing any restraints among the Brownshirts.

A true president brings people together. Trump pits groups of citizens against one another.

It is amusing listening to Trump-obsessed haters talking about Trump dehumanizing democrats, given the vile rhetoric they spew at Trump and anyone that does not share their hate of Trump and his supporters.

Now these morons are comparing Democrats to Jews in Nazi Germany.

It is the left pitting everyone against each other

16 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Blocking traffic is peaceful (there is no death penalty on blocking traffic). And she followed orders when she was summoned to move away. She was turning her wheel away from the officers (her car went the other way, as can be seen).
How do you feel about the security guard who shot Ashli Babbit, who was breaching into the Capitol? When you say Ross cannot be blamed, then you agree that this guard can also not be blamed (when a burglar breaches into your house, you have the right to shoot him, when you feel threatened).

Blocking traffic is not peaceful, and she did not follow orders when ordered to move. Had she moved, the officered would not have gotten out of the car.

Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It is amusing listening to Trump-obsessed haters talking about Trump dehumanizing democrats, given the vile rhetoric they spew at Trump and anyone that does not share their hate of Trump and his supporters.

Now these morons are comparing Democrats to Jews in Nazi Germany.

It is the left pitting everyone against each other

It is amusing reading people like you going on about "haters", day in, day out.....😊

You could try another tack to make things more interesting instead of childish.........🤗

12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It is amusing listening to Trump-obsessed haters talking about Trump dehumanizing democrats, given the vile rhetoric they spew at Trump and anyone that does not share their hate of Trump and his supporters.

Now these morons are comparing Democrats to Jews in Nazi Germany.

It is the left pitting everyone against each other

I am talking about a president!
Obama, nor Biden delivered hate speeches.

1 minute ago, Steven55 said:

I am talking about a president!
Obama, nor Biden delivered hate speeches.

Yep, they didn't have too, the present cowboy has to, to please his follower type......😬

13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Blocking traffic is not peaceful, and she did not follow orders when ordered to move. Had she moved, the officered would not have gotten out of the car.

Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie

Ross did not act according to police guidelines.Good was mving away, just check the real video, not the AI-fake of the White House.
You find it ok she was shot, but you do not find it ok that Ashli Babbit was shot.
And just wait for Trump to call out emergency situation and cancel the midterm elections.

On 1/15/2026 at 4:17 AM, Yellowtail said:

She was a mother that (apparently) left her child at home to protest ICE.

Not that it has any bearing on whether her shooting was justified, but she did not leave her child at home to protest ICE.

As multiple reports from various outlets have stated, her child had been dropped off at school earlier.

Here's just one example:

Renee's 6-year-old son was living with her and Becca in Minneapolis, and they had dropped him off at school just before her death.

Renee Nicole Good's Family: What to Know About Her Wife and 3 Kids

https://people.com/renee-nicole-good-family-wife-kids-what-to-know-11885168

7 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How would an agent be expected to know who this woman is?

What "homework" should a law enforcement officer be doing at the end of their shift?

Because they can use the vehicle as a weapon.

And the people that do, have no issues with federal law enforcement.

Do you generally support deporting illegal aliens?

In one of the videos she was parked sideways in the road as the leading caravan car of protesters. She sat there dancing to the sound of her childish horn beeping soon there after the Feds approached ,got out of there cars ,one can be heard 4x saying get out of your car. Looking at all the comments many on the international left are sympathetic to unlawful activists activities.

Google ai overview:

"If a federal agent determines you are obstructing traffic, you could face arrest and prosecution for a federal crime, specifically obstruction of justice or interfering with a federal officer, which can carry penalties of a fine and up to one year in prison. In some cases, depending on the severity and intent, the penalties could be more severe, potentially resulting in a felony charge". 

Just now, riclag said:

In one of the videos she was parked sideways in the road as the leading caravan car of protesters. She sat there dancing to the sound of her childish horn beeping soon there after the Feds approached ,got out of there cars ,one can be heard 4x saying get out of your car. Looking at all the comments many on the international left are sympathetic to unlawful activists activities.

Google ai overview:

"If a federal agent determines you are obstructing traffic, you could face arrest and prosecution for a federal crime, specifically obstruction of justice or interfering with a federal officer, which can carry penalties of a fine and up to one year in prison. In some cases, depending on the severity and intent, the penalties could be more severe, potentially resulting in a felony charge". 

You missed out can be executed, that's very naughty, and you're not a lefty, either..............🤣

3 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

The claim that later shots automatically make it premeditated murder lacks support in the reported facts or legal commentary on this case!

Suggest you do a bit of research on that before making such a claim.

3 hours ago, transam said:

The bloke run out in front of her car to fire a shot through the screen................🤣

Then he moved to the side to finish her off with 2 shots.............🤣

Talk about being gullible, but you're definitely in line for Trump's Golden Long Nose Trophy ......🤣.................

Now if I were the shooter, I would definitely have developed a limp and demanded an ambulance, but he should have done that before walking with a skip in his step to look at the damage he caused from his kill.............🤫

Was certainly pretty mobile walking around just after his shoot out with an unarmed motorist.

9 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

And yet another well thought out response from the high IQ left.

I don't have a high IQ, unlike you and Donnie, who confirms his high IQ every day, just like you. I don't even have a yellow tail. ;-)

1 hour ago, Steven55 said:

Ross did not act according to police guidelines.Good was mving away, just check the real video, not the AI-fake of the White House.

Good was moving out of the way, only after she blocked traffic and interfered with federal law enforcement long enough that she was being arrested. THEN she attempted to flee the crime scene.

1 hour ago, Steven55 said:

You find it ok she was shot, but you do not find it ok that Ashli Babbit was shot.

No, I find it a tragedy she was shot. I do not think the officer should have shot her.

1 hour ago, Steven55 said:

And just wait for Trump to call out emergency situation and cancel the midterm elections.

You are delusional.

17 minutes ago, BerndD said:

I don't have a high IQ, unlike you and Donnie, who confirms his high IQ every day, just like you. I don't even have a yellow tail. ;-)

We know

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

That has been completely debunked. It was a delusional Trump fabrication.

Debunked by who?

1 hour ago, Artisi said:

Suggest you do a bit of research on that before making such a claim.

Right back at ya!!

Multiple rapid shots can support arguments for excessive force, recklessness, or even intent in some cases, but they do not "automatically" establish premeditation under Minnesota law or in commentary on this incident. The claim holds up—no such automatic rule is cited in reliable sources. The case remains under investigation (FBI primary, state gathering evidence separately), with no charges filed yet.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Good was moving out of the way, only after she blocked traffic and interfered with federal law enforcement long enough that she was being arrested. THEN she attempted to flee the crime scene.

No, I find it a tragedy she was shot. I do not think the officer should have shot her.

You are delusional.

Ok, so we agree: you said "No, I find it a tragedy she was shot. I do not think the officer should have shot her."
I assume you are a law abiding citizen, who respects the law and has the opinion that also police officers have to act according to the law and guidelines.
The officer who shot Good did not act according to police guidelines.
She was an unarmed woman, with both hands on the steering wheel, turning her front wheels away from officer Ross (check analyses with video, done by NY Times), who was aside the car (even if he were in front of the car, the police guidelines prescribe that even then he is not allowed to shoot, but should step aside. Just check that!).

Even shooting is not allowed in this case:
In the United States, police officers are not allowed to shoot an unarmed burglar who is running away with stolen goods. Deadly force is only permitted when the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Property theft alone is never enough to justify shooting.

This rule comes from both U.S. Supreme Court decisions and modern police use‑of‑force policies across the country.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Good was moving out of the way, only after she blocked traffic and interfered with federal law enforcement long enough that she was being arrested. THEN she attempted to flee the crime scene.

No, I find it a tragedy she was shot. I do not think the officer should have shot her.

You are delusional.

Oh, and regarding this (my quote, which you find delusional): And just wait for Trump to call out emergency situation and cancel the midterm elections.
He already said the midterm elections are not necessary. He will do anything to prevent these. He will try it, 'read my lips" !

2 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Ok, so we agree: you said "No, I find it a tragedy she was shot. I do not think the officer should have shot her."
I assume you are a law abiding citizen, who respects the law and has the opinion that also police officers have to act according to the law and guidelines.
The officer who shot Good did not act according to police guidelines.
She was an unarmed woman, with both hands on the steering wheel, turning her front wheels away from officer Ross (check analyses with video, done by NY Times), who was aside the car (even if he were in front of the car, the police guidelines prescribe that even then he is not allowed to shoot, but should step aside. Just check that!).

Even shooting is not allowed in this case:
In the United States, police officers are not allowed to shoot an unarmed burglar who is running away with stolen goods. Deadly force is only permitted when the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Property theft alone is never enough to justify shooting.

This rule comes from both U.S. Supreme Court decisions and modern police use‑of‑force policies across the country.

She was a criminal fleeing a crime scene.

I don't think the officer should have shot her.

I do not think she was murdered

An officer is allowed to use deadly force if the officer believes his life is in danger. or the lives of others are in danger,

This is the most detailed video I've seen.

He had the phone in his right hand, then switched over to his left hand so he could draw his gun ... anyway, she makes several arguments why it was intent to kill, not self defense and not justified at all.

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

She was a criminal fleeing a crime scene.

No not really.

She didn't seem to be blocking ICE agents.

The agent seems to have been provoking them more than the other way around. He blocked her first.

That's why she said "I'm not mad at you" and her wife said "You want to come at us?".

The agent was aggressive from the start without justification.

2 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

No not really.

She didn't seem to be blocking ICE agents.

The agent seems to have been provoking them more than the other way around. He blocked her first.

That's why she said "I'm not mad at you" and her wife said "You want to come at us?".

The agent was aggressive from the start without justification.

Interfering with federal law enforcement is a crime.

The woman used the car to block the officers, that is the only reason they got out of their car.

She was stopped sideways in the road.

Just now, Yellowtail said:

Interfering with federal law enforcement is a crime.

Seems like the agent was looking to make the situation get out of hand.

They are supposed to go out of their way to de-escalate.

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Interfering with federal law enforcement is a crime.

This woman does a good job of analyzing the video.

Officer seems out of line to me.

Before the shooting, she is signaling to other agents to drive by. She was not obstructing.

Just now, save the frogs said:

This woman does a good job of analyzing the video.

Officer seems out of line to me.

Is she saying that interfering with federal law enforcement is not a crime?

Who is she, and why would I trust her?

There would have been not interaction, had the woman not interfered.

Do they really think we are this dumb?

Jonathan Ross was moving out while Renee Good was bleeding out.

He got "hit" in the hip and has internal bleeding.

Do they consult with medical experts before making up lies?

YOU WOULDN'T BE DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL IF YOU WERE BLEEDING INTERNALLY.

Your hip is connected to your pelvis.

You can internally bleed if you fracture your Pelvis but that car was going 2mph.

Even if he did sustain an injury, why is he lifting heavy boxes?

I'm sure his discharge summary told him not to that which he would've known if he was at the hospital.

Try again Dementia Don.

Just because you're an idiot.

Doesn't mean we are.

Stop protecting JONATHAN ROSS.

Arrest him for MURDER.

7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Is she saying that interfering with federal law enforcement is not a crime?

Who is she, and why would I trust her?

There would have been not interaction, had the woman not interfered.

Yellowtale, you can repeat another 1000 times that it was her own fault. Then still, you will be 1000 times wrong: the police officer did NOT act according to the guidelines. Even if he ordered her to stop the car, ordered her to get out of the car, and next she disobeys and drives away, the officer acted again the guidelines when he shot her. SO he is WRONG and should be prosecuted. Any judge and jury will agree with my analyses. Period!

41 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

No not really.

She didn't seem to be blocking ICE agents.

The agent seems to have been provoking them more than the other way around. He blocked her first.

That's why she said "I'm not mad at you" and her wife said "You want to come at us?".

The agent was aggressive from the start without justification.

She sat, perpendicular to traffic, blocking the road for several minutes. Honking her horn all the while. What was the purpose, if not to block the agents and prevent them from doing their jobs? Especially with her wife outside filming the whole thing. This was no innocent "oops, sorry I blocked the street" moment. It was planned and discussed ahead of time.

And AFTER sitting, when ordered to exit the vehicle, THEN she decided to take off as if it were all just a big joke. I agree that I don't think she had any malicious intent to run Ross over. He was simply in the way and she either didn't notice or misjudged her manoeuvre.

As for Ross' actions at that point, an investigation will decide whether or not they were justified.