It came on a night of death and destruction for Ukraine with massive attacks on civilians in their homes, especially in Kyiv and Volodymyr Zelensky's birthplace, Kryvyi Rih.

Vladimir Putin has shockingly unleashed the Oreshnik missile! Russia confirms the nuclear-capable strike slammed near the Ukrainian city of Lviv, sending Europe's nerves into overdrive. The audacious attack targeted Europe’s largest underground gas storage site, dangerously close to NATO and EU territory, just 40 miles from Poland.

Rumors swirl as Russian propaganda trumpets the missile’s capabilities, claiming it could obliterate London in eight short minutes. The lightning-fast strike led to fevered online speculation about Russia's use of this ballistic beast. But Ukrainian investigators remain cautious, only promising confirmation after a meticulous study of the debris left behind.

In a bold move, Russia's defense ministry admits to deploying the Oreshnik, arguing it was a retaliatory act against an alleged Ukrainian attempt to target Putin’s palace in the Novgorod region. Kyiv and Western intelligence agencies staunchly refute this, branding the claim as mere spin.

“In response to this supposed threat, strategic Russian forces launched a massive operation,” boasted Moscow officials. Using precision weapons, drones, and the famed Oreshnik system, Russia aimed to cripple critical Ukrainian sites. Reports suggest infrastructure key to Ukraine’s military prowess was in the crosshairs.

This marks the second live deployment of the 'unstoppable' Oreshnik, first flaunted in Dnipro in 2024 without a warhead, intended more as a psychological weapon than destructive force. Currently, Oreshnik units edge closer in Belarus, amplifying fears across Europe. This latest launch from the Kapustin Yar range illustrates Russia's capability to hit with catastrophic precision in under seven minutes.

Amidst this turmoil, Ukraine’s sense of security has shattered. The monumental power of the blasts reverberated across the region, proudly touted by Russian channels like War Gonzo, who gush about the “devastating might” felt by all.

For Ukraine, the damage inflicted at the Stryi gas storage is a bitter blow, especially in the hard grip of winter. Russia's habitual pummeling of Kyiv turned night into a relentless hell, leaving scores dead or wounded. In a haunting display at Kryvyi Rih, a ballistic strike split a home in two, embodying the sheer terror inflicted on innocent civilians.

International rhetoric fires up as Western leaders condemn the brutality. The missile's menace serves as a stark reminder of Putin’s unyielding strategy, flouting diplomatic appeals from figures like Donald Trump for an end to the hostilities.

Analysts speculate on the wider implications. Does this mark a shift toward greater escalation? Are these signals of an intent to widen the conflict? As the diplomatic chessboard shifts, one thing is clear: tensions are at boiling point, with peace seemingly a fading hope.

In the Sumy region, artillery strikes pound the landscape, erasing any illusion of peace. With every strike, Putin sends a calculated message: defiance, power, and disregard for international pleas. As citizens brace for what comes next, Ukraine's resilience faces its greatest test.

Key Takeaways

• Russia flexes its military muscle, striking Ukraine with precision!

• Tensions flare as peace talks falter amidst relentless assaults!

• Europe watches warily as Putin defies diplomatic efforts for peace!

  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Express 2026-01-09

 

 

And UK submarines have enough nuclear heads to destroy all Russian large cities in retaliation.

46 minutes ago, candide said:

And UK submarines have enough nuclear heads to destroy all Russian large cities in retaliation.

Sounds like a win-win scenario all around to me.

1 hour ago, candide said:

And UK submarines have enough nuclear heads to destroy all Russian large cities in retaliation.

Excellent idea. Just nuke Russia and all will be well. Do it tomorrow. You're safe in Thailand! For sure.

7 minutes ago, connda said:

You're safe in Thailand! For sure.

probably, but certainly not safe in the UK if they use their submarines to attack Russia with nuclear weapons that's just M.A.D.

Trumps subs are said to be lurking near Russian waters ,Putin wouldn’t be crazy to do it. His mouth pieces will get em in trouble

1 hour ago, connda said:

Excellent idea. Just nuke Russia and all will be well. Do it tomorrow. You're safe in Thailand! For sure.

I wrote "in retaliation". My point is that if Russia nukes UK, even its small nuclear force will be enough to nuke most of Russia in retaliation, and Russia knows it.

An unstoppable weapon is only good until someone figured out how to stop it.

French knights thought they were unstoppable until they were stopped by English bowmen at Agincourt.

Just now, Purdey said:

An unstoppable weapon is only good until someone figured out how to stop it.

That's where "scale" comes into it.

No point knowing how to stop it if they can build three of the missiles to your two missiles that can stop it. That means, some, or many, will get through.

Doomed, doomed, we’re all doomed.

40 minutes ago, Purdey said:

An unstoppable weapon is only good until someone figured out how to stop it.

French knights thought they were unstoppable until they were stopped by English bowmen at Agincourt.

I'm no weapons expert, but I suspect it may be harder to stop a nuclear missile than a French knight.

Just saying.

The Oreshnik missile only travels at Mach10. They reportedly have one under development that will travel near Mach 30.

18 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Doomed, doomed, we’re all doomed.

36 minutes ago, GreasyFingers said:

The Oreshnik missile only travels at Mach10. They reportedly have one under development that will travel near Mach 30.

i want to fly to Thailand at Mach 30

Given the weird behaviour of the so called Western "democracies" it's definitely good that Russia has sich strong weapons to defend itself.

5 minutes ago, Flying Saucage said:

Given the weird behaviour of the so called Western "democracies" it's definitely good that Russia has sich strong weapons to defend itself.

Another Putin fan boy

19 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Doomed, doomed, we’re all doomed.

Your post implies that any conflict, big or small, will have no impact on you.

Whilst your personal safety may be fine, I would be surprised if your currency didn't take a hit should conflict escalate.

52 minutes ago, Anthony mellows said:

Another Putin fan boy

Another Starmer fan boy

1 hour ago, Flying Saucage said:

Given the weird behaviour of the so called Western "democracies" it's definitely good that Russia has sich strong weapons to defend itself.

Russia has not been attacked and no one intends to attack it. It's Russia attacking and threatening other countries. 😀

21 hours ago, candide said:

I wrote "in retaliation". My point is that if Russia nukes UK, even its small nuclear force will be enough to nuke most of Russia in retaliation, and Russia knows it.

Look at Russia on a map, then look at the UK on a map and ask yourself which would be easier to turn into molten glass if SHTF.

Here's a hint... The UK is about the size of Michigan.

13 minutes ago, impulse said:

Look at Russia on a map, then look at the UK on a map and ask yourself which would be easier to turn into molten glass if SHTF.

Here's a hint... The UK is about the size of Michigan.

As I wrote before, it doesn't really matter as UK subs (or French subs) have enough nuclear heads to nuke Russia. A single sub carries 40 nuclear heads, which is enough to nuke the main cities.

If Russia nukes UK or France, it will be nuked too. The same cannot be said of other European countries which are dependent on the US good will.

Even Putin is not that mad or stupid to use nuclear missiles or Rockets on the UK

The retaliation from NATO would wipe Russia out never mind what the USA has as well That's why it's called MAD

5 hours ago, malibukid said:

i want to fly to Thailand at Mach 30

Ask the Russians if they will give you a ride.

4 hours ago, Flying Saucage said:

Another Starmer fan boy

Can't stand either actually.

On 1/9/2026 at 3:40 AM, candide said:

And UK submarines have enough nuclear heads to destroy all Russian large cities in retaliation.

And you are assuming that the UK submarine fleet is fully operational. The UK has 4 submarines armed with nuclear missiles. Only 1 is at sea at any given time. The other 3 are in port for maintenance or training or budget constraints.

The Russians track their enemies and it is a very good certainty that before any Russian attack, the UK submarine would be identified and neutralized. The 3 other submarines would never leave port, having been neutralized. The UK does not have a nuclear deterrent force.

4 hours ago, candide said:

As I wrote before, it doesn't really matter as UK subs (or French subs) have enough nuclear heads to nuke Russia. A single sub carries 40 nuclear heads, which is enough to nuke the main cities.

If Russia nukes UK or France, it will be nuked too. The same cannot be said of other European countries which are dependent on the US good will.

I think you miss the member's point.

Russia is the biggest country in the world, by land mass.

Yes, the UK / EU can nuke cities in Russia, but Russian towns, villages etc will still go on. That's how big Russia is.

If Russia nukes the UK, the whole island is GONE. Uninhabitable. Picture, all of the UK looking like Hiroshima.

No proper Brits would sign up to defend Starmer's Britain so they may as well end this charade about imminent WW3. Nobody is buying it.

I'm sure the cultural enrichers will fight to the death to show their gratitude to the traitor for allowing them into the country though. Roll out those DEI quotas and sign em up Keir. Good luck.

26 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

And you are assuming that the UK submarine fleet is fully operational. The UK has 4 submarines armed with nuclear missiles. Only 1 is at sea at any given time. The other 3 are in port for maintenance or training or budget constraints.

The Russians track their enemies and it is a very good certainty that before any Russian attack, the UK submarine would be identified and neutralized. The 3 other submarines would never leave port, having been neutralized. The UK does not have a nuclear deterrent force.

Right, only one is permanently out, and 2 in period of crisis.

Please share your source stating that it's that easy to spot nuclear submarines. It's not what I read.

21 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

I think you miss the member's point.

Russia is the biggest country in the world, by land mass.

Yes, the UK / EU can nuke cities in Russia, but Russian towns, villages etc will still go on. That's how big Russia is.

If Russia nukes the UK, the whole island is GONE. Uninhabitable. Picture, all of the UK looking like Hiroshima.

Well it's a pale consolation after the majority of the population has been nuked.....

BTW, the EU doesn't send nukes. It has no defense prerogative, according to the treaties signed by member States.

8 minutes ago, candide said:

Well it's a pale consolation after the majority of the population has been nuked.....

Of course. It's a hypothetical.

9 minutes ago, candide said:

BTW, the EU doesn't send nukes. It has no defense prerogative, according to the treaties signed by member States.

Of course it doesn't. 😂