On 1/19/2026 at 5:19 AM, Evil Penevil said:

The Trump administration is discussing the possibility of offering asylum to Britain’s Jewish population, The Telegraph can reveal.

A better solution would be to offer mandatory asylum to Israeli Jews. In fact, the whole state of Israel would fit into a corner of Montana without anybody noticing. Benefits of clearing Jews out of Israel:

1. Genocide stops instantaneously.

2. Palestinians get back what was stolen.

3. Hamas, Hezbollah, et al, go quiet because there's nothing left to resist.

4. Iran gives up its nuclear fuel and ballistic missiles, like Trump wants, because see above.

5. Peace in the ME.

6. British Jews don't want to leave because no one hates Jews anymore.

7. Drum roll - Trump gets the Prize.

8. Everyone else lives happily ever after.

2 minutes ago, Autocan said:

A better solution would be to offer mandatory asylum to Israeli Jews. In fact, the whole state of Israel would fit into a corner of Montana without anybody noticing. Benefits of clearing Jews out of Israel:

1. Genocide stops instantaneously.

2. Palestinians get back what was stolen.

3. Hamas, Hezbollah, et al, go quiet because there's nothing left to resist.

4. Iran gives up its nuclear arsenal and ballistic missiles, like Trump wants, because see above.

5. Peace in the ME.

6. British Jews don't want to leave because no one hates them anymore.

7. Drum roll - Trump gets the Prize.

8. Everyone else lives happily ever after.

Disgusting suggestion.

The Jewish people are indigenous to Israel.

3 minutes ago, Autocan said:

A better solution would be to offer mandatory asylum to Israeli Jews. In fact, the whole state of Israel would fit into a corner of Montana without anybody noticing. Benefits of clearing Jews out of Israel:

1. Genocide stops instantaneously.

2. Palestinians get back what was stolen.

3. Hamas, Hezbollah, et al, go quiet because there's nothing left to resist.

4. Iran gives up its nuclear arsenal and ballistic missiles, like Trump wants, because see above.

5. Peace in the ME.

6. British Jews don't want to leave because no one hates Jews anymore.

7. Drum roll - Trump gets the Prize.

8. Everyone else lives happily ever after.

I think mandatory asylum of Palestinians. The whole "state" of Palestine would fit easily in the EU.

24 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

He is generalizing, but not all generalizations are discriminatory in the negative sense of the word. What he has written is a truism. You could substitute any religion or ethnicity for "Jews" and be equally correct.

Why did you snip his disgraceful full post?

He is most certainly generalising about some people in a negative way.

Here's the full post.

" I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science, unlike the parasites we have crawling in from Ohmar's hood and parts unknown, with low IQs. We need the best and brightest immigrants from Asia and all the Jews across the planet."

7 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Disgusting suggestion.

The Jewish people are indigenous to Israel.

If Jewish Israelis are indigenous to the land, why did so many famous Israeli leaders change their names from clearly European ones to Hebrew after arriving or during the early years of the state?

For example, David Grün becoming Ben-Gurion, Golda Mabovitch becoming Golda Meir, and even Benjamin Netanyahu’s father changing the family name from Mileikowsky to Netanyahu.

56 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Sure you did, a legend in your own mind/

Yes I did. Get back to moaning about what you missed out on life, when working on the tarmac/refuse collection "crews"/riding the railcars. I guess Parkhead is some exotic place for you, in your dreams. If those dreams were infused by Thunderbird.

1 minute ago, JimCM said:

If Jewish Israelis are indigenous to the land, why did so many famous Israeli leaders change their names from clearly European ones to Hebrew after arriving or during the early years of the state?

For example, David Grün becoming Ben-Gurion, Golda Mabovitch becoming Golda Meir, and even Benjamin Netanyahu’s father changing the family name from Mileikowsky to Netanyahu.

Why did so many Europeans change their names when they came to the US?

A post quoting multiple posts has been removed:

• Do not quote more than three multiple nested quotes. Only quote the person you are replying to, and only quote the relevant section that you are discussing.

13 minutes ago, JimCM said:

If Jewish Israelis are indigenous to the land, why did so many famous Israeli leaders change their names from clearly European ones to Hebrew after arriving or during the early years of the state?

For example, David Grün becoming Ben-Gurion, Golda Mabovitch becoming Golda Meir, and even Benjamin Netanyahu’s father changing the family name from Mileikowsky to Netanyahu.

Few Jews in Israel are indigenous Arabic Jews. The rest are Ashkenazi, Sephardic, etc, who moved there from places like Europe and Russia after the state of Israel was formed.

Sorry, not formed, imposed.

15 minutes ago, Autocan said:

A better solution would be to offer mandatory asylum to Israeli Jews. In fact, the whole state of Israel would fit into a corner of Montana without anybody noticing. Benefits of clearing Jews out of Israel:

1. Genocide stops instantaneously.

2. Palestinians get back what was stolen.

3. Hamas, Hezbollah, et al, go quiet because there's nothing left to resist.

4. Iran gives up its nuclear arsenal and ballistic missiles, like Trump wants, because see above.

5. Peace in the ME.

6. British Jews don't want to leave because no one hates Jews anymore.

7. Drum roll - Trump gets the Prize.

8. Everyone else lives happily ever after.

Good idea. Pre 1948, there was relative peace in the middle east.

29 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I think mandatory asylum of Palestinians. The whole "state" of Palestine would fit easily in the EU.

What exactly is the state of Palestine?

You make more sense when you use one word replies

On 1/19/2026 at 10:33 AM, JimCM said:

If anyone supports a country whose government has destroyed 90% of Gaza, killed 50,000 + women and children, starved them, etc and has killed over 100 children since the ceasefire, I will dislike them intensely.

This may be by donating money or simply flying a star if David.

So, you can look at a Jewish person and know where they stand on the issues?

14 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Disgusting suggestion.

The Jewish people are indigenous to Israel.

Not true. Not all Jewish people can trace their lineage to Israel, due to conversions that happened in the past. By dint, are most Americans indigenous to countries in Europe? I suspect they would be given short shrift by immigration if they rocked up expecting to settle, without a visa. And given the historic shifting borders of the South Western United States, does than mean most Mexicans are indigenous American citizens? Modern examples of people who are Jewish but not indigenous to Israel are Ivanka Trump, Liz Taylor, Marilyn Monroe, Sammy Davis Jr. Genetically I might be 30% Irish, but I have no entitlement to an Irish passport. Also, I can't become Danish, Icelandic or Norwegian.

Modern Judaism is considered not a missionary religion; unlike Islam and Christianity, there is no active effort to convert people. During the period of the Roman Empire, thousands oof conversions were performed in Asia-Minor (Turkey-Georgia-Armenia-Northern Iraq), which ended when the Roman Empire collapsed. Notoriously, the Idumea people (Edomites) were conquered and forced to convert to Judaism. Idumea lies within the present boundaries on Israel, on the West Bank. These enslaved peoples might have converted later to Christianity or Islam. The truth is, many of the conflicts are almost internicine in character, and the idea that being Jewish is no more of an ethnicity than being a Muslim, as we are repeatedly reminded.

Around about 300Ad, the Romans started to crack down on enforced conversions. Jewish people often kept Christian slaves, and tried to convert them. Rome introduced the death penalty for anyone converting to the Jewish faith. On the other hand, they issued edicts protecting those who converted to Christianity. Rome Law started to use extremely negative language in relation to Judaism, such as secta nefaria and feralis.

https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4620-constantine-i-flavius-valerius-aurelius-constantinus

It seems conversions to Judaism in Europe persisted into the Middle Ages; Rabbis were burnt for the act of allegedly converting Christians. The Deacon of Oxford converted to Judaism and was burnt at the stake for his pains around about 1200. Even in the 17th Century, 20,000 Transylanian Szeklers converted to Judaism. These people did practice a form of Protestantism, that include Jewish practice. The Hungarian community that was decimated in WW2 was largely a descendant of these people, or more particularly, so-called crypto Jews, who had converted in private, but changes in Hungarian law allowed them to enjoy protection by the state, and they were able to "come out", so to speak.

3 hours ago, JimCM said:

Why did you snip his disgraceful full post?

He is most certainly generalising about some people in a negative way.

Here's the full post.

" I welcome more Jews to America...they are very smart, knows a lot about Finance and Engineering and Science, unlike the parasites we have crawling in from Ohmar's hood and parts unknown, with low IQs. We need the best and brightest immigrants from Asia and all the Jews across the planet."

I didn't snip taboo2's full post; stevenl did and I was responding to stevenl's post.

34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Why did so many Europeans change their names when they came to the US?

Depends on the period. For English speaking peoples, there was no standardisation of the language until the early 19th Century. Anyone who does geneology has to contend with changes in names. One of my family names is Marriott, but in the 16th Century, this was Maret.

Later on, in the 19th Century, there was probably a lot of illiteracy or misunderstanding. McWhirter often ended up getting spelt with a Q, whether that was the settlers using that spelling, or a bureaucrat filling in a ledger. And the change stuck. American Nativists forced people to Anglicise their names (so Trump became Trumpf). Later again, WW1 saw more peope ditching in particular German names.

Probably not as many as you think changed name; because 250 years on, many many people have recognisably English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, German, Nordi, Dutch, French, Italian, Greek and Russian surnames. Societal pressure of course leads to rationalisation of first names. Probably descendants of immigrants from non-European cultures have had to change their names the most. The obvious example will be slave descendants among African Americans who lost their family names when their ancestors were treated as chattle.

8 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

He is generalizing, but not all generalizations are discriminatory in the negative sense of the word.

That's what i thought. He's clearly discriminating in his remark, but you don't mind since you agree. So you charge the question and add 'in the negative sense of the word'.

7 hours ago, Autocan said:

A better solution would be to offer mandatory asylum to Israeli Jews. In fact, the whole state of Israel would fit into a corner of Montana without anybody noticing.

Montana has a population of 1.1 million people, so it would be quite noticeable if 7.2 million Jews were suddenly moved in. 😄Currently only about 5,000 Jews live in Montana.

In the early 20th century, there was a Zionist plan to bring Russian Jews to Texas as a safe haven. It was called the Galveston Movement. "Between 1907 and 1914, when it ceased operation, the Jewish Immigrants' Information Bureau brought 10,000 immigrants through Galveston, approximately one-third the number who migrated to the Holy Land during the same period."

https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/galveston-movement

This is an article about the Galveston Movement from a San Francisco newspaper in 1907.

3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

That's what i thought. He's clearly discriminating in his remark, but you don't mind since you agree. So you charge the question and add 'in the negative sense of the word'.

I don't know how much the Mods appreciate arguments over the definition of words, but to generalize is not the same thing as to discriminate. Statements like, "Most Thais have black hair," or "Thais are friendly," are generalizations, but not discriminatory. However, if someone says, "Thais are dishonest," that is discriminatory as it reveals prejudice. Generalizations which don't carry a negative meaning aren't discriminatory.

7 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

However, if someone says, "Thais are dishonest," that is discriminatory as it reveals prejudice.

The post i replied to wasn't a generalisation, it revealed prejudice. But you agree, therefore you don't mind and defend.

5 minutes ago, stevenl said:

The post i replied to wasn't a generalisation, it revealed prejudice. But you agree, therefore you don't mind and defend.

Prejudice like when leftists call "MAGAs" fat and stupid and whatnot?

41 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Prejudice like when leftists call "MAGAs" fat and stupid and whatnot?

Frustrated much?

What is the relation between maga's being fat and stupid and the US contemplating asylum to British Jews?

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Prejudice like when leftists call "MAGAs" fat and stupid and whatnot?

Truth is not prejudice - if the MAGA cap fits - wear it !

27 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Frustrated much?

What is the relation between maga's being fat and stupid and the US contemplating asylum to British Jews?

Is that a yes?

11 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

There's nothing discriminatory about the words in Taboo2's post you quoted.

He is generalizing, but not all generalizations are discriminatory in the negative sense of the word. What he has written is a truism. You could substitute any religion or ethnicity for "Jews" and be equally correct.

It is based on my experience in college....my Jewish friends worked hard, got the best grades and were very good in Science, Engineering and Finance. facts!

1 hour ago, Taboo2 said:

It is based on my experience in college....my Jewish friends worked hard, got the best grades and were very good in Science, Engineering and Finance. facts!

I went to a very diverse school in California. I do not remember any Jews, but I remember the Indians and Asian students being very hard workers. The only cheaters I remember were Arabs, but this was back in the mid '90s, I've heard the cheating is much more widespread now.

1 hour ago, Taboo2 said:

It is based on my experience in college....my Jewish friends worked hard, got the best grades and were very good in Science, Engineering and Finance. facts!

Please tell your experience with the other people you 'generalise' about.

You generalize positively about Jews, but what about the 'parasites' with low IQs? Are you referring to all non Jews?

Some are ignoring the second half of your disgraceful post.

"unlike the parasites we have crawling in from Ohmar's hood and parts unknown, with low IQs."

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I went to a very diverse school in California. I do not remember any Jews, but I remember the Indians and Asian students being very hard workers. The only cheaters I remember were Arabs, but this was back in the mid '90s, I've heard the cheating is much more widespread now.

Ah, the only reason you support the Terrorist IDF is coming out. It's your blatant Islamophobia.

7 minutes ago, JimCM said:

Ah, the only reason you support the Terrorist IDF is coming out. It's your blatant Islamophobia.

I have no idea if they were Muslims, I did not even know what a Muslim was at that time, I only know that at least half of them were cheating, and I did not notice anyone else cheating.

I worked for a Jew for a few years back in the '70s, one of the best bosses I ever had.

Here's an interesting opinion piece by a brave British Jew. She nails the solution: " ...it is Britain’s duty, as a nation that prides itself on tolerance and pluralism, to not tolerate racism in any form. And that includes anti-Semitism. British Jews are not the problem."

But what's the best way to make British Jews safe?

As a British Jew I am not going anywhere

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/as-a-british-jew-i-am-not-going-anywhere/ar-AA1WrfKW?ocid=msedgntp&pc=W230&cvid=6992d903dfd54da0bce85430e61d761b&ei=63&cvpid=f2d785150cc34326d68e3a61331a94f9

This is heavy-duty antisemitism. Attacks against Jewish-owned businesses were the focus of the infamous "Kristalnacht" in Germany in 1938. What connection does a London bakery have with the war in Gaza? It is insane to consider vandalism a form of political protest.

New branch of Gail's is targeted for second time by vandals painting anti-Zionist graffiti

A new branch of a Gail's bakery has been targeted for a second time by pro-Palestine vandals who smashed windows and painted anti-Zionist graffiti.

The shop in Archway, north London, only on opened last week but has been repeatedly attacked as part of an 'intimidation' campaign.

The coffee shop's windows were smashed and anti-Zionist messages were sprayed onto the front early on Wednesday morning.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/new-branch-of-gail-s-is-targeted-for-second-time-by-vandals-painting-anti-zionist-graffiti/AA1X910auxmode=ruby&ocid=edgntpruby&pc=W230&cvid=69aff50696f24a4aa2af632727fd728d&ei=52&cvpid=aba3fd0eea7d4f71a9490ea37d2b9384

2 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

What connection does a London bakery have with the war in Gaza?

It's main investor, Bain Capital invested $150 in Israeli companies last year. Disgraceful.

We should be boycotting international criminals, not supporting them.

https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/sknwfnuolx?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Why go to the USA when we have China as an alternative?

I would go to China, where Jews face no prejudice.

Also, I am talking Jews from the UK, of course.