US President Donald Trump has drawn criticism after making a remark referencing the Attack on Pearl Harbor during a White House meeting with Japan’s prime minister. The comment came as Mr Trump hosted Sanae Takaichi in the Oval Office on Thursday, where discussions focused in part on the ongoing conflict involving Iran.

Get today's headlines by email

During a question-and-answer session, a Japanese journalist asked why the United States had not informed allies, including Japan, ahead of military action against Iran.

In response, Mr Trump said that maintaining an element of surprise was important in military operations.

Exchange during Iran war discussion

“One thing you don’t want to do is signal too much,” he said, before adding: “Who knows better about surprise than Japan?”

He then followed up with another remark, asking: “Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?”

The comments prompted initial laughter in the room, though the mood reportedly shifted after the reference to the 1941 attack.

Historical reference raises unease

The Japanese strike on Pearl Harbor in Hawaii on 7 December 1941 killed more than 2,000 Americans and led to the United States entering the Second World War. Then-president Franklin D. Roosevelt described it as “a date which will live in infamy.”

The war between the two nations ended in 1945 following the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Observers noted that Ms Takaichi appeared uncomfortable following the exchange, as the topic touched on a sensitive chapter in US-Japan relations.

Mixed reactions to remarks

Supporters of the president praised the comment as a sharp response to the question. Eric Trump described it on social media as one of the most notable exchanges with a reporter.

Others were more critical. Journalist Mehdi Hasan said the remark was striking but expressed concern about its tone given the historical context.

The exchange was not the first time Mr Trump has faced criticism over references to historical conflicts. In a previous meeting with Germany’s chancellor Friedrich Merz, he described the D-Day landings as “not a pleasant day,” prompting a correction that the event marked the liberation of Germany from Nazi rule.

Broader tensions over Iran conflict

The meeting also highlighted ongoing tensions between the United States and its allies over the conflict involving Iran. Mr Trump has repeatedly criticised partner countries for their reluctance to provide military support, particularly in securing the Strait of Hormuz.

Japan faces domestic constraints in deploying its Self-Defense Forces abroad, due to its post-war constitution, which limits military engagement.

Following the meeting, Ms Takaichi said both sides agreed on the importance of safeguarding key shipping routes, while outlining the legal limitations on Japan’s military role.

Despite the awkward moment, officials suggested the overall tone of the meeting remained constructive, with both leaders seeking to maintain close diplomatic ties.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 March 2026

View full article

According to Gen Kelly, when Trump and Kelly were on the launch at Pearl Harbor, on the way to view the Arizona Memorial, Kelly claims Trump asked, "So what's this boat all about?"

It seems to me he did again not really know what happened and is confused.

When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor it was an enemy they attacked!

Why warn an enemy about an attack? Did trump warn Iran?

No! Iran was still engaged in talks and did not expect an attack at all!

What ms.Takaichi meant is "Why did you not inform your allies?"

She was very nice about it,i would have asked him how he could play golf with bone spurs.

Lieutenant Kermit Tyler ignored a report that a large amount of airplanes where flying towards Pearl

Harbor,so it was a costly fault by the US army at that time.

More to come i am sure.

55 minutes ago, jvs said:

What ms.Takaichi meant is "Why did you not inform your allies?"

Easy answer ... they can't be trusted 🙄