The Republicans did not mind impeaching Bill Clinton over a Blow Job, but I am glad to hear that the have now attained a new found civil responsibility, that prevents them from attacking Prez. Obama for the good of the country.

I don't think Congress (either party) ever does much of anything for the good of the country. They are probably thinking of how much work they'll have, how many all-nighters and how many holidays worked if they had to re-do everything over the past three years.

Clinton was not impeached for the BJ, but for his bad taste in mistresses and he was Guilty, Guilty Guilty!

True, if she had been some Hollywood hottie like JFK had Marilyn Monroe maybe he wouldn't have committed PERJURY, the real offense he was impeached for (not the blowjob). Not a minor offense either as any regular person would have lost their job and gone to jail for doing the same.

But, we're getting off topic. The topic isn't about one citizen giving the president a blowjob, but closer to the president f***ing the citizens and how he'll lose his job in a few months.

REPORT: OBAMA SPENDS MORE TIME ON GOLF THAN ECONOMY

When it was recently reported that Mr. Obama had played his 100th round of golf, the president said that playing golf was "the only time that for six hours, I'm outside." Therefore, by his own estimate, the president has spent 600 hours playing golf, as compared to just 412 hours in economic meetings of any kind throughout his presidency.

But just how little time Mr. Obama has spent working on the economy can be seen in the data contained in the Government Accountability Institute’s analysis:

• Throughout the first 1,257 days of his presidency, Mr. Obama has spent just 412 hours in economic meetings or briefings of any kind
  
• In 2012, so far Obama has spent just 24 total hours in economic meetings of any kind
  
• Assuming a six day, 10-hour workweek, Obama has spent less than 4 percent of his total time in economic meetings or briefings of any kind
  
• There were 773 days (72 percent), excluding Sundays, in which he had no economic meetings
  
• Mr. Obama has spent an average of 138 minutes a week in economic meetings. According to a study published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, new dog owners spent an average of 130 minutes a week walking their dogs
  

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/19/REPORT-Obama-Spends-Nearly-As-Much-Time-On-The-Economy-As-Dog-Owners-Spend-Walking-Their-Dogs

The Republicans did not mind impeaching Bill Clinton over a Blow Job, but I am glad to hear that the have now attained a new found civil responsibility, that prevents them from attacking Prez. Obama for the good of the country.

I don't think Congress (either party) ever does much of anything for the good of the country. They are probably thinking of how much work they'll have, how many all-nighters and how many holidays worked if they had to re-do everything over the past three years.

I could not agree with you more on the first statement about congress, There some good people there, but with a system as it exists now they are set up to fail. In order that they stay there, they have to compromise them selves so much, that after a while they cant even remember why they went there.

But I have to disagree about your second statement with regard to their motivations. Their motivation is much much more complex than just laziness.

And you are right, both parties are just as bad, in fact there are no two parties, there is only one party , the Property Party party ,that has two wings, the conservative wing (Republicans) and the Liberal/ progressive wing which is the Democrats, If you will look at both republicans and democrats, you will see that they only differ in some minor social issues, but are consistent in their protection of the wealthy.

I know some will argue that the Democrats are for bigger Government, and the Republicans for less involvement of the government in the peoples lives. (bla bla bla), unless of course it is a conservative issue such as Gay rights, or reproductive rights or religion, where they conveniently forget their political,orientation become activists, and don't mind having the government involved.And the democrats are for the common man, unless of course it is about bailing out Wall street'

So this argument about elections and republicans and democrats is a moot point, It is a distraction from the main issues , which is that the American political system is irreparably broken, steadily marching towards a Monolithic State, who's only real concern is the protection of Wealth.

And that's what this Birther issue is also, a distraction.

You know, How pick pockets work?

they work in pairs, one bumps in to you, and while you are busy paying attention to the person who bumped in to you, the other picks your pocket.

Do you remember all the different issues during different elections? Willy Horton,Monica Lewinsky, The American flag, Swift boaters, birthers? does the process sound familiar to you now? Have you checked in your pocket for your wallet lately?

The Republicans did not mind impeaching Bill Clinton over a Blow Job, but I am glad to hear that the have now attained a new found civil responsibility, that prevents them from attacking Prez. Obama for the good of the country.

I don't think Congress (either party) ever does much of anything for the good of the country. They are probably thinking of how much work they'll have, how many all-nighters and how many holidays worked if they had to re-do everything over the past three years.

I could not agree with you more on the first statement about congress, There some good people there, but with a system as it exists now they are set up to fail. In order that they stay there, they have to compromise them selves so much, that after a while they cant even remember why they went there.

But I have to disagree about your second statement with regard to their motivations. Their motivation is much much more complex than just laziness.

And you are right, both parties are just as bad, in fact there are no two parties, there is only one party , the Property Party party ,that has two wings, the conservative wing (Republicans) and the Liberal/ progressive wing which is the Democrats, If you will look at both republicans and democrats, you will see that they only differ in some minor social issues, but are consistent in their protection of the wealthy.

I know some will argue that the Democrats are for bigger Government, and the Republicans for less involvement of the government in the peoples lives. (bla bla bla), unless of course it is a conservative issue such as Gay rights, or reproductive rights or religion, where they conveniently forget their political,orientation become activists, and don't mind having the government involved.And the democrats are for the common man, unless of course it is about bailing out Wall street'

.

I don't think it is such a radical statement to say, "Forget term limits, let's put Congressmen on trial for treason". Even Obama doesn't make me as sick as I feel when some member of Congress calls what he does "service to the country". They make out like bandits and with lifetime pensions and special healthcare, etc. Lock'em all up.

Here is a shocker from Nancy Pelosi. She practically DEFENDS Romney on the releasing tax returns. Probably because if people keep calling for tax returns to be released, they might start asking for hers & her husband's. BTW - I was told once that her husband owned one of those large hilltop houses on Koh Samui near Plai Laem. Not bad for a public servant.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/07/19/Pelosi-Threatens-Media-Maybe-The-People-Writing-These-Stories-Should-Release-Their-Tax-Returns

^^^^^I have to agree,when an elected official knowingly does something that is against the best interest of it's country, then the only term limits should be the length of the jail sentence.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Romney releases his tax returns? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing them, which he clearly will not do.

So here's the latest thinking on this from that "radical left wing blog" -- the best newspaper in America, the Washington Post:

Of course, members of Romney’s team, unlike their friends on the outside, presumably know what the documents would reveal, so we should probably assume that they have fairly good reason not to release them.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/if-romney-releases-his-tax-returns-what-are-the-worst-things-we-could-find/2012/07/20/gJQAkZMAyW_story.html

The liberal press are actively working to prevent Romney from being elected. There is nothing new there.

The liberal press are actively working to prevent Romney from being elected. There is nothing new there.

So it is the liberal media Like the Washington Post who are preventing him from releasing his tax returns,

while the conservative media sits Idly by , entertaining it's self by looking at ways Obama's Birth Certificate might be altered. I wonder what would had being if they had looked lust as hard for the existence of WMD's in Iraq under Bush?

The tax thing is just a lame distraction from Obama's record and pretty much everyone knows it. They also know that if he releases them, it will just be some other lame distraction (like whining about having bank accounts overseas). However, some do not want to admit it because it is a (underhanded) political tactic and admitting it would not serve their needs.

I don't know of any mainstream "conservative media" that said Obama's birth certificate was fake (although I would imagine there were a few nuts). Even Bill O'Reilly said that he is an American citizen on a regular basis.

Again, what is Romney hiding?

No doubt something very politically toxic or he wouldn't be resisting so strongly.

Now the democrats are advancing a bill to require TEN YEARS returns from candidates.

This issue won't go away.

Romney won't cave and people will go to the polls KNOWING Romney is hiding something very bad.

As far as I can tell, this goes directly to what tax experts told me yesterday: It’s likely that Romney has paid a far lower tax rate in multiple years, and that this could help explain why Romney won’t release his returns. If he paid nothing in any given year, of course, that would be even more politically toxic. But even a far lower rate would be hard to explain. And as the experts told me, the returns could also reveal how Romney reduced his rates — whether he relied on “aggressive sheltering,” which would be politically very problematic, or more standard techniques, which would still be hard to explain, depending on how much lower his rate ended up being.

http://www.washingto...q40tW_blog.html

Looks like you need to recharge your batteries. Here's some humorous red meat:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2012/07/romney-claims-dog-ate-tax-returns-and-ran-bain-capital-for-three-years.html

The liberal press are actively working to prevent Romney from being elected. There is nothing new there.

So it is the liberal media Like the Washington Post who are preventing him from releasing his tax returns,

while the conservative media sits Idly by , entertaining it's self by looking at ways Obama's Birth Certificate might be altered. I wonder what would had being if they had looked lust as hard for the existence of WMD's in Iraq under Bush?

Others are calling it a distraction...

_____________________________________________________

Nancy Pelosi Downplays Tax Return Demand

By Jonathan Strong

July 19, 2012, 11:57 a.m.

Facing questions about why she and other top Congressional officials won’t release their tax returns, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) downplayed her previous demands for presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney to release his, calling the issue a distraction.

As recently as Wednesday, Pelosi had strongly urged Romney to provide further disclosure of his tax returns. But today, while maintaining Romney should release more documents because of “custom” and “tradition,” Pelosi said the issue was trivial compared with economic issues.

“We spent too much time on that. We should be talking about middle-income tax cuts,” Pelosi said after answering two questions about the issue.

http://www.rollcall....-1.html?pos=hln

The liberal press are actively working to prevent Romney from being elected. There is nothing new there.

So it is the liberal media Like the Washington Post who are preventing him from releasing his tax returns,

while the conservative media sits Idly by , entertaining it's self by looking at ways Obama's Birth Certificate might be altered. I wonder what would had being if they had looked lust as hard for the existence of WMD's in Iraq under Bush?

Others are calling it a distraction...

_____________________________________________________

Nancy Pelosi Downplays Tax Return Demand

By Jonathan Strong

July 19, 2012, 11:57 a.m.

Facing questions about why she and other top Congressional officials won’t release their tax returns, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) downplayed her previous demands for presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney to release his, calling the issue a distraction.

As recently as Wednesday, Pelosi had strongly urged Romney to provide further disclosure of his tax returns. But today, while maintaining Romney should release more documents because of “custom” and “tradition,” Pelosi said the issue was trivial compared with economic issues.

“We spent too much time on that. We should be talking about middle-income tax cuts,” Pelosi said after answering two questions about the issue.

http://www.rollcall....-1.html?pos=hln

Asking Politicians who offer us their past performance as proof of their performance in the future to reveal documentation that collaborate their claims , such as tax returns is a distraction and they should get away with not presenting such information because other scandals in the political process have done it also.

The liberal press are actively working to prevent Romney from being elected. There is nothing new there.

So it is the liberal media Like the Washington Post who are preventing him from releasing his tax returns,

while the conservative media sits Idly by , entertaining it's self by looking at ways Obama's Birth Certificate might be altered. I wonder what would had being if they had looked lust as hard for the existence of WMD's in Iraq under Bush?

Others are calling it a distraction...

_____________________________________________________

Nancy Pelosi Downplays Tax Return Demand

By Jonathan Strong

July 19, 2012, 11:57 a.m.

Facing questions about why she and other top Congressional officials won’t release their tax returns, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) downplayed her previous demands for presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney to release his, calling the issue a distraction.

As recently as Wednesday, Pelosi had strongly urged Romney to provide further disclosure of his tax returns. But today, while maintaining Romney should release more documents because of “custom” and “tradition,” Pelosi said the issue was trivial compared with economic issues.

“We spent too much time on that. We should be talking about middle-income tax cuts,” Pelosi said after answering two questions about the issue.

http://www.rollcall....-1.html?pos=hln

Asking Politicians who offer us their past performance as proof of their performance in the future to reveal documentation that collaborate their claims , such as tax returns is a distraction and they should get away with not presenting such information because other scandals in the political process have done it also.

You lost me in there somewhere.

That's for sure.

You lost me in there somewhere.

Ok , let me try to explain

Politicians offer as what they did in the past and how they have behaved , as proof of ability and character. especially Romney who talks about his business performance as a proof of his ability to govern.

But when asked to release his tax returns so that we might be able to corroborate his claims, he refuses.

Do you follow me so far?

Nancy Peloci is just as bad as he is, she had her own tax return issues. so it's no wonder she want's to change the subject.she has no moral authority on the subject,

Just because one thief committed a crime and got away with it, does not mean that we should not demand of other thieves that they don't commit the same crime,

What's the worse that would be revealed if Romney releases his tax returns? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing them, which he clearly will not do.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Obama releases his birth certificate? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing it, which he clearly will not do.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Romney releases his tax returns? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing them, which he clearly will not do.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Obama releases his birth certificate? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing it, which he clearly will not do.

That would have being true if Obama had not released his Birth Certificate Last year,rhttp://www.washingto...ns/romneys-tax-

returns-obamas-birth-certificate-and-the-end-of-trust/2012/07/20/gJQA2eZbyW_story.html

Quote from wikipedia

Belief in the conspiracy theories has persisted despite Obama's pre-election release of his official birth certificate from Hawaii in 2008,^[1] additional confirmation by the Hawaii Department of Health based on the original documents,^[6] and the April 2011 release of a certified copy of Obama's original Certificate of Live Birth (so-called long-form birth certificate). Other evidence of Obama's Hawaii birth has surfaced such as birth announcements published in August 1961 in two Hawaii newspapers

But hey... let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory

You lost me in there somewhere.

Ok , let me try to explain

Politicians offer as what they did in the past and how they have behaved , as proof of ability and character. especially Romney who talks about his business performance as a proof of his ability to govern.

But when asked to release his tax returns so that we might be able to corroborate his claims, he refuses.

Do you follow me so far?

Nancy Peloci is just as bad as he is, she had her own tax return issues. so it's no wonder she want's to change the subject.she has no moral authority on the subject,

Just because one thief committed a crime and got away with it, does not mean that we should not demand of other thieves that they don't commit the same crime,

That is much more coherent, thank you.

What do Romney's tax returns have to do with his business performance? One can look at the success of his company and determine that simple fact. Google Bain Capital and find out anything you want to know about the company. To help you determine if Romney was a successful business man, here is a link to the company he founded. Do your research and then let us know if his business venture was profitable or not.

http://www.baincapital.com/

Since we are discussing the previous business career of Romney, please provide some information concerning his opponent's business ventures and success in that field. I would be particularly interested in his management experience and in particular what experience specifically qualifies him for the high position which he currently holds.

Finally, your comment about the two thieves is somewhat confusing. Are you referring to Obama as the first thief?

PS: Now be honest. Tell us you aren't just a teensy bit interested in seeing Obama's college records and transcripts.

You lost me in there somewhere.

Ok , let me try to explain

Politicians offer as what they did in the past and how they have behaved , as proof of ability and character. especially Romney who talks about his business performance as a proof of his ability to govern.

But when asked to release his tax returns so that we might be able to corroborate his claims, he refuses.

Do you follow me so far?

Nancy Peloci is just as bad as he is, she had her own tax return issues. so it's no wonder she want's to change the subject.she has no moral authority on the subject,

Just because one thief committed a crime and got away with it, does not mean that we should not demand of other thieves that they don't commit the same crime,

That is much more coherent, thank you.

What do Romney's tax returns have to do with his business performance? One can look at the success of his company and determine that simple fact. Google Bain Capital and find out anything you want to know about the company. To help you determine if Romney was a successful business man, here is a link to the company he founded. Do your research and then let us know if his business venture was profitable or not.

http://www.baincapital.com/

Since we are discussing the previous business career of Romney, please provide some information concerning his opponent's business ventures and success in that field. I would be particularly interested in his management experience and in particular what experience specifically qualifies him for the high position which he currently holds.

Finally, your comment about the two thieves is somewhat confusing. Are you referring to Obama as the first thief?

PS: Now be honest. Tell us you aren't just a teensy bit interested in seeing Obama's college records and transcripts.

What do Romney's tax returns have to do with his business performance?

are you serious?

his tax returns are the definitive record, of his business activities for a particular year made to the IRS , and signed to be true under penalty of law.

When I applied for a mortgage the first thing they asked for was my tax return

When I applied for Fiance visa for my now wife , they asked for my tax returns.

when I applied for a job, among other things the asked for three years of tax returns

Yet Romney, applying for the top job in the country should not have to supply his tax return?

If his opponent used his previous business experiences as a bases for election he should also supply his tax return.

Ohh wait he did.

I am referring to any thief, be it he is Republican, Democrat or any other political affiliation.

PS: if Obama used his college performance as a reason of why he should be re-elected, then he should provide us with a transcript of the records

What's the worse that would be revealed if Romney releases his tax returns? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing them, which he clearly will not do.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Obama releases his birth certificate? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing it, which he clearly will not do.

That would have being true if Obama had not released his Birth Certificate

OK, you're a newbie here so I'll walk you through it... True, Obama released his birth certificate - but only after 3 years of resisting and fighting against doing so. When he did, there was nothing bad in it after all. Obama supporter JT thinks that something bad must be in Romney's taxes for him to resist releasing them. All I did was make a similar statement based on JT's quote, changing Romney to Obama, and tax returns to birth certificate. By doing so, I showed JT that Romney not releasing his tax returns DOES NOT mean he is hiding anything. Of course, he could always disagree but that would make him look a like a bit of a hypocrite.

when I applied for a job, among other things the asked for three years of tax returns

What job requires three years of tax returns? To run for POTUS not even one tax return is required. Candidates do it voluntarily.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Romney releases his tax returns? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing them, which he clearly will not do.

What's the worse that would be revealed if Obama releases his birth certificate? Clearly something worse politically than not releasing it, which he clearly will not do.

That would have being true if Obama had not released his Birth Certificate

OK, you're a newbie here so I'll walk you through it... True, Obama released his birth certificate - but only after 3 years of resisting and fighting against doing so. When he did, there was nothing bad in it after all. Obama supporter JT thinks that something bad must be in Romney's taxes for him to resist releasing them. All I did was make a similar statement based on JT's quote, changing Romney to Obama, and tax returns to birth certificate. By doing so, I showed JT that Romney not releasing his tax returns DOES NOT mean he is hiding anything. Of course, he could always disagree but that would make him look a like a bit of a hypocrite.

Totally wrong! The demand for Obama's birth certificate was ... RACIST.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2011/apr/27/barack-obama-obama-administration

OK, you're a newbie here so I'll walk you through it... True, Obama released his birth certificate - but only after 3 years of resisting and fighting against doing so. When he did, there was nothing bad in it after all. Obama supporter JT thinks that something bad must be in Romney's taxes for him to resist releasing them. All I did was make a similar statement based on JT's quote, changing Romney to Obama, and tax returns to birth certificate. By doing so, I showed JT that Romney not releasing his tax returns DOES NOT mean he is hiding anything. Of course, he could always disagree but that would make him look a like a bit of a hypocrite.

Being a "newbie" here does not in any way reduce my capacity for reason.

Comparing the release of Obama's birth certificate to Romney's Tax return is comparing apples and oranges .

No president in the past was asked to release his birth certificate , why should Obama have to? asking him to do so was an insult.

but by not releasing it, some people inferred that he was hiding something and , and to put this distraction behind him he eventually relented to the insult and released it.

In the case of Romney , he makes claims that his character and business attributes uniquely qualify him to be president. The request of his Tax return is apropos in relation to his claims .

It is a case of put up or shut up.

I don't really know how many different ways I can say that.

It is not an insult to him to ask for his tax returns, Tax returns are routinely requested as a means of verifing claims of past employment because they contain your W-2s , and or sources of income to verify claims.

By not releasing them it is also reasonable for some to infer that he is hiding something. Obama and every other candidate released theirs.

Why not him?

I will be honest I Don't know,

So I will violate the first rule of debating by asking a question to which I don't already know the answer to.

Why is he not releasing his Tax returns like every one else? what is he afraid of?

Notice I was fare and did not say what is he hiding, because he might not be hiding anything, he might have some other reason for not releasing his tax returns.

when I applied for a job, among other things the asked for three years of tax returns

What job requires three years of tax returns? To run for POTUS not even one tax return is required. Candidates do it voluntarily.

No tax request is required of me also it was requested as a means of verifying past employment claims made by me in my application.

I could had refused, but good luck getting the job

It is not required of Romney also it is requested, to verify claims of past business experience claims made by him.

He can also refuse, but also good luck getting the job.

OK, you're a newbie here so I'll walk you through it... True, Obama released his birth certificate - but only after 3 years of resisting and fighting against doing so. When he did, there was nothing bad in it after all. Obama supporter JT thinks that something bad must be in Romney's taxes for him to resist releasing them. All I did was make a similar statement based on JT's quote, changing Romney to Obama, and tax returns to birth certificate. By doing so, I showed JT that Romney not releasing his tax returns DOES NOT mean he is hiding anything. Of course, he could always disagree but that would make him look a like a bit of a hypocrite.

Being a "newbie" here does not in any way reduce my capacity for reason.

Comparing the release of Obama's birth certificate to Romney's Tax return is comparing apples and oranges .

No president in the past was asked to release his birth certificate , why should Obama have to? asking him to do so was an insult.

but by not releasing it, some people inferred that he was hiding something and , and to put this distraction behind him he eventually relented to the insult and released it.

In the case of Romney , he makes claims that his character and business attributes uniquely qualify him to be president. The request of his Tax return is apropos in relation to his claims .

It is a case of put up or shut up.

I don't really know how many different ways I can say that.

It is not an insult to him to ask for his tax returns, Tax returns are routinely requested as a means of verifing claims of past employment because they contain your W-2s , and or sources of income to verify claims.

By not releasing them it is also reasonable for some to infer that he is hiding something. Obama and every other candidate released theirs.

Why not him?

I will be honest I Don't know,

So I will violate the first rule of debating by asking a question to which I don't already know the answer to.

Why is he not releasing his Tax returns like every one else? what is he afraid of?

Notice I was fare and did not say what is he hiding, because he might not be hiding anything, he might have some other reason for not releasing his tax returns.

Why is he not releasing his Tax returns like everyone else? Oh, if that's what's bothering you don't worry. Romney has already released his latest complete tax return. He will release the 2011 return when it is complete. In 2008, McCain released two years of returns and that was fine. Romney is doing nothing wrong. The Obama campaign and their misguided supporters are trying to distract from the FACT that Obama is a MISERABLE FAILURE as president (hey, JT, CAPS are fun!) .

when I applied for a job, among other things the asked for three years of tax returns

What job requires three years of tax returns? To run for POTUS not even one tax return is required. Candidates do it voluntarily.

No tax request is required of me also it was requested as a means of verifying past employment claims made by me in my application.

I could had refused, but good luck getting the job

It is not required of Romney also it is requested, to verify claims of past business experience claims made by him.

He can also refuse, but also good luck getting the job.

They needed your tax return to verify your past employment? Had they ever heard of a telephone? They could simply contact your previous employer and ask about you like every anyone else would.

OK, you're a newbie here so I'll walk you through it... True, Obama released his birth certificate - but only after 3 years of resisting and fighting against doing so. When he did, there was nothing bad in it after all. Obama supporter JT thinks that something bad must be in Romney's taxes for him to resist releasing them. All I did was make a similar statement based on JT's quote, changing Romney to Obama, and tax returns to birth certificate. By doing so, I showed JT that Romney not releasing his tax returns DOES NOT mean he is hiding anything. Of course, he could always disagree but that would make him look a like a bit of a hypocrite.

Totally wrong! The demand for Obama's birth certificate was ... RACIST.

And you wonder why I referred to you as a troll before?

when I applied for a job, among other things the asked for three years of tax returns

What job requires three years of tax returns? To run for POTUS not even one tax return is required. Candidates do it voluntarily.

No tax request is required of me also it was requested as a means of verifying past employment claims made by me in my application.

I could had refused, but good luck getting the job

It is not required of Romney also it is requested, to verify claims of past business experience claims made by him.

He can also refuse, but also good luck getting the job.

They needed your tax return to verify your past employment? Had they ever heard of a telephone? They could simply contact your previous employer and ask about you like every anyone else would.

Wow you are so bright, why don you call them and tell them that.

oh wait because you don't have the number of the appropriate person and don't want to make a large telephone number of telephone calls.

This is getting boring

OK, you're a newbie here so I'll walk you through it... True, Obama released his birth certificate - but only after 3 years of resisting and fighting against doing so. When he did, there was nothing bad in it after all. Obama supporter JT thinks that something bad must be in Romney's taxes for him to resist releasing them. All I did was make a similar statement based on JT's quote, changing Romney to Obama, and tax returns to birth certificate. By doing so, I showed JT that Romney not releasing his tax returns DOES NOT mean he is hiding anything. Of course, he could always disagree but that would make him look a like a bit of a hypocrite.

Totally wrong! The demand for Obama's birth certificate was ... RACIST.

And you wonder why I referred to you as a troll before?

What are you on about? Birthers are racist by definition.