webfact Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 Democrats blast MP term-limit proposalThe NationEC accused of 'looking like amateurs'BANGKOK: -- Politicians have cried foul over the Election Commission's proposal to restrict MPs' rights by letting them serve only two consecutive four-year terms.Democrat Party deputy leader Nipit Intarasombat described the proposal as a daydream, saying the EC has lost touch with reality, as no democratic country has such a restriction."The proposal makes the agency look like amateurs. They should wake up and have a strong cup of coffee and learn that only the term of a premier or president is limited," he said.He said restricting MP terms would cripple the government-checking mechanism because the country needs strong opposition parliamentarians who have skills, experience and knowledge in law and politics.Democrat Party's chief legal specialist Wiratana Kalayasiri also disapproved of the idea, saying many MPs have knowledge of their constituencies in depth and their constituents should be able to vote them back in to continue working for locals.He also voiced opposition to a proposal to prevent MPs from becoming members of political parties, saying the EC needs to install a mechanism to prevent political parties from dominating MPs.Wiratana pushed for the proposal to prevent prime ministers and Cabinet members who have stepped down or lost their posts from serving as caretakers, but instead allowing permanent secretaries to take over.He also agreed with the proposal that the EC is solely responsible for scheduling an election date without requiring the approval of the PM.EC secretary-general Puchong Nutrawong said the commission had not reached any conclusion to change election laws but only prepared studies on the advantages and drawbacks of various election systems.The EC has suggested that a mixed system of both constituencies and party lists be maintained. However, he said the constituency system should be changed from single-member to multi-member. He also recommended that the number of MPs from both election systems should be similar.He said the EC also proposed that MPs not be required to follow orders from their parties. They would have to be a member of a political party for at least one year before applying as a candidate for Parliament.Other proposals are that MPs cannot serve more than two consecutive terms. Spouses, children, and parents of MPs would banned from becoming MPs and senators in the same term as their relatives.Puchong said the EC would soon present its studies and proposals to the National Council for Peace and Order. The National Legislative Assembly will make the decision in regard to any changes.Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Democrats-blast-MP-term-limit-proposal-30238068.html-- The Nation 2014-07-09
Popular Post rkidlad Posted July 9, 2014 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2014 'Democrat Party deputy leader Nipit Intarasombat described the proposal as a daydream, saying the EC has lost touch with reality, as no democratic country has such a restriction' Well there was never a real democracy here before and there certainly isn't one at the moment; because of the way these 'politicians' (red or yellow) have conducted themselves. Typical politician - wants to have his cake and eat it. 7
Popular Post terryp Posted July 9, 2014 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2014 one term is more than enought ...get new blood and ideas into thai poitics 3
Popular Post siampolee Posted July 9, 2014 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2014 The two term rule is not really a great idea, a good M.P. and there are one or two of them here in Thailand (albeit they bieng regarded as enangered species.) However the restriction on family members being involved in the senate is indeed a watertight proposal. The proposal of a years membership prior to being considered for election is a good idea, stops or rather limits the crossing of the floor for non political reasons! The party list must be abolished, one should be elected to parliament by popular vote not by virtue of possible financial transactions so as to facilitate ones M.P. status or pack a cabinet. Political party membership must be allowed , a free ranging group of M.P. and a cabinet made up from them would in many cases bne a chaotic nay anarchy style of administration as well as self serving.Politicians need labels, the public must have some idea as to their choice of possible M.P. political stance. As said though these are all proposals and although the flowers on the tree always look great often the fruit produced is less in quantity and quality than the flowers. 4
siampolee Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 terryp post # 4 One term is more than enough... to get new blood and ideas into Thai politics Sort of based upon the 2010 scheme of political change of things perhaps.
Ricardo Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 (edited) I thought the Democrats owned the EC... Perhaps you were wrong ? If American presidents can have a term-limit, then why ever not Thai MPs, think of it as 'Thainess in Action' dear Dems ! Edited July 9, 2014 by Ricardo
chainarong Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 I think that if you have an excellent Prime Minister , why would you settle for an ordinary one , the party machine elects its Prime ministers not the EC, so it has nothing to do with who is a leader, or who is elected, that is reserved for the people, as for the comment of members not connected to a political party, that's nuts, how do you think they are elected, do you want a government full of independents, wrangling and fighting like a pack of wolves, the position of P.M. should be three terms, if they desire and ordinary members including Ministers two terms ,includes the senate, all members that have served cannot take up any government or agency appointment and no relation shall be appointed whilst a member is in government, easy, now show us what you are made of EC. 1
Popular Post noitom Posted July 9, 2014 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2014 Eight years of a Thai politician is way more than enough. 3
pisico Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 (edited) When it suits their purpose of having an appointed seat in parliament for life, they are for the pitch and forks against those who want renovation of ideas, merit and qualifications to be a member of Parliament. After all, once they make it to Bangkok, even if they are from the deep South, they are quasi-elite. Why Thais are always blasting other countries because they suggest and, at times demand, they exercise a version of governance closer to Democracy? Why? Thainess. We do not trust Farangs! (Suthep before the disastrous last election when parties and organizations wanted international scrutiny of the elections). Fast forward to the present:and their selective reasoning will make the Dems say: "Democrat Party deputy leader Nipit Intarasombat described the proposal as a daydream, saying the EC has lost touch with reality, as no democratic country has such a restriction." It does not matter. Red, yellow, green or pink will always be drenched in Thainess. Read: graft, favoritism, nepotism and other isms. OCDers, before talking about the billions "stolen" by the Shin clan, revisit Thai history of the past 20 years and you will find plenty of graft and malfeasance in Thai politics in all the colors of the spectrum. Edited July 9, 2014 by pisico
pisico Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 I think that if you have an excellent Prime Minister , why would you settle for an ordinary one , the party machine elects its Prime ministers not the EC, so it has nothing to do with who is a leader, or who is elected, that is reserved for the people, as for the comment of members not connected to a political party, that's nuts, how do you think they are elected, do you want a government full of independents, wrangling and fighting like a pack of wolves, the position of P.M. should be three terms, if they desire and ordinary members including Ministers two terms ,includes the senate, all members that have served cannot take up any government or agency appointment and no relation shall be appointed whilst a member is in government, easy, now show us what you are made of EC. EC is made of Thainess:whether they admit it or not.
casualbiker Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 I thought the Democrats owned the EC... Perhaps you were wrong ? If American presidents can have a term-limit, then why ever not Thai MPs, think of it as 'Thainess in Action' dear Dems ! America's political system is different to most in the world. Interesting read here : http://www.rogerdarlington.me.uk/Americanpoliticalsystem.html Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app
allan michaud Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> one term is more than enought ...get new blood and ideas into thai poitics Anyway, with the TRT/PTP and other variations on Thaksin's party, his ministers never stayed in a position for more than a few months before another nose was inserted into the trough. So this idea wouldn't make much difference.
chainarong Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> I think that if you have an excellent Prime Minister , why would you settle for an ordinary one , the party machine elects its Prime ministers not the EC, so it has nothing to do with who is a leader, or who is elected, that is reserved for the people, as for the comment of members not connected to a political party, that's nuts, how do you think they are elected, do you want a government full of independents, wrangling and fighting like a pack of wolves, the position of P.M. should be three terms, if they desire and ordinary members including Ministers two terms ,includes the senate, all members that have served cannot take up any government or agency appointment and no relation shall be appointed whilst a member is in government, easy, now show us what you are made of EC. alt=coffee1.gif width=32 height=24> EC is made of Thainess:whether they admit it or not. Thailand will still be grovelling and pi!!ing into the wind a hundred years from now, If nothing will change all things stay the same. ( Wansbrough)
Chris Lawrence Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 Whats the other side think? Maybe they are not allowed. A bit of chest beating? Putting things out there to see how the public feels. Maybe they should let TV members who have over 1000 posts run for a seat?
Roadman Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 (edited) As if most including the nations writers cannot get the idea that the Junta has no favourites in this current military reign then said Nations writers and "history is static' naysayers should start reading articles like this. Loving that the Democrats are feeling the same ball squeezing from the Junta and his teams. But then if this is their feeling He said restricting MP terms would cripple the government-checking mechanism because the country needs strong opposition parliamentarians who have skills, experience and knowledge in law and politics. then when they are in governance they also need to show better governance that the equal corrupt and incompetent garbage that comes from most thai politicians and all thai political parties. Agree with them however that limiting to two terms is not a good idea as the few in the past that have been there more for Thailand and its people than themselves need to have longer terms to bring those better values through. Again as always it comes back to the most abused issue in Thailand being the lack of law enforcement. The first steps they should be implementing is those with criminal records should not be allowed to stand for office, those that are already there are stood down and removed for criminals offences including corruption of any sort. For geez sake in my country MP's who even take a hand-out for something like a free night out are under threat of parliamentary expulsion if they do not declare it. Even contacting immigration over a constitutes immigration status if that immigrant has donated to that political party is a sacking offence. Compare that to Thailand where criminals not only get into parliament but while there can carry on crime with immunity. The countries laws but more importantly the enforcement of those laws and sentences is a joke. Fix that first and most of the rest will start to full into place. Edited July 9, 2014 by Roadman
aussieinthailand Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 WHAT THE??? the EC suggesting a 2 term limit for politicians,,, no need for this, if the EC and the powers that be are not happy with a MP or political party then they'll do as they have done for so many years now, bullets bombs and WHALA, COUP,,, No sandwiches, no reading certain books, no asking for your rights, no criticism, no freedom of speech, and everyone must join national happiness, OR ELSE!!!
Popular Post shirtless Posted July 9, 2014 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2014 Politicians the world over seem to be complacent if they stay in power to long, and seem to become to easily corrupted by their power. 3
Pib Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 Politicians are not going to let term limits happen as it goes against their core belief (i.e., need for long term power).
smutcakes Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 Wonder what will happen when the current election commission's term ends in September. I can imagine something like: President of EC: Mr Prayuth Associate Mr. Prawit......... more of his military class mates
fresnoboy Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 'one term is more than enough ...get new blood and ideas into thai poitics' As long as there is no "Golden Parachute" for one termers.
Eric Loh Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 Why even bother to propose. It is already there with the red cards and the courts idiosyncrantic rulings. No office bearers last more than a term. Reform the EC, that's the priority.
Maroon Watcher Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 When I was younger I wanted to be an MP for the good I could do. Then the EU came along - so I wanted to be an MEP for the Lifestyle, the luxury travel ... and the ******* MONEY!!!!
spidermike007 Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 I think term limits are always a good thing. There is little in the way of continuity of policies from one administration to the next here anyway, so there appears to be no benefit to society, by having these guys continue getting elected one term after the next. If they were going to use their experience to benefit the Thai people, that would be ok. But, they demonstrate one term after the next, that they have no concern for the people. Especially the masses, which are so far beneath them, in terms of socio economic levels. Get rid of the pests. Clean the place out. Term limits are a beautiful thing. 2
oneday Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 (edited) Democrat Party deputy leader Nipit Intarasombat described the proposal as a daydream, saying the EC has lost touch with reality, as no democratic country has such a restriction. The biggest term limit in the western democratic world is the president of the United States so I don't know who this idiot is who thinks it's a daydream, but he is certainly an ignorant individual. There have been strong attempts to limit terms for the US congress which of course are defeated because just about every congressman and senator will be against it. There have even been proposals for terms limits for the Justices of the Supreme Court. Many states in America have term limits for their government legislature. The whole reason is because the longer an elected official is in power the more powerful they get and the greater the chance is they will abuse their power. It's pretty self-evident when people of power start to feel invincible they change. Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely Edited July 9, 2014 by oneday
rickirs Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> I thought the Democrats owned the EC... alt=rolleyes.gif> Perhaps you were wrong ? alt=wai2.gif width=20 height=20> If American presidents can have a term-limit, then why ever not Thai MPs, think of it as 'Thainess in Action' dear Dems ! alt=laugh.png> The American President is not equivalent to Thai MPs but more similar to a PM although elected directly by the national electorate via the electoral college. US Congressmen are similar to the MPs and have no term limits. 2
Popular Post airconsult Posted July 9, 2014 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2014 I have a much simpler suggestion for improvement - remove MP's immunity from prosecution. Surely everyone would be on board with that 3
smutcakes Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 I have a much simpler suggestion for improvement - remove MP's immunity from prosecution. Surely everyone would be on board with that Good point, and someone should raise it urgently.
kimamey Posted July 9, 2014 Posted July 9, 2014 I thought the Democrats owned the EC... Perhaps you were wrong ? If American presidents can have a term-limit, then why ever not Thai MPs, think of it as 'Thainess in Action' dear Dems ! Very simple really the term limit applies to the president not to members of the house of representatives or the senate which would be the closest comparison to MPs. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now