Thousands join anti-Trump protests around country

[Publicus]

7 hours ago, dcutman said:

If Hillary was elected she would own that same dubious record, and that's a fact. But now she only has to deal with being the most perceived dishonest, corrupt candidate that ever lost an election.   

 

Just say, "Donald Trump is the most unpopular Potus-Elect in the history of the country." Can you say it?

 

Can the Right Sector say, "Unless Donald Trump changes his spots, he will become and by far, the most unpopular Potus to take the oath of office."

 

Can youse guyz say it?

 

It would be a great therapy for you and the rest of the Right Sector to say, "Donald Trump is likely the most unpopular elected president or prime minister in the history of any democratic system of government."

 

Can youse guyz say it, and also say it without saying anything about the person who will not become Potus and who was defeated in this election?

 

Can youse guys over there do this?

 

I thought not. In fact I know you can't say it or anything like it.

Edited November 14, 2016 by Publicus
Spacing.

[Publicus]

1 hour ago, Linzz said:

 

I know the game.  When you guyz win well really you lose because we know that winners are really losers at heart and even when we lost we know that inside we came out winners. Yep I get it. At school it's best to give losers certificates so they don't feel so bad. Everybody wins. Yaay!

 

Giddy is better than sore.

 

Hooray!

 

So let's present the post as something of a model of some kind going forward.

 

One sees anyway that today there's more of the traditional ribbing going on than the standard trump post election day grumping, scolding, angry white guy winner sorehead 'we're gonna getchuback stuff.

 

Encouraging.

[dcutman]

1 minute ago, Publicus said:

 

Just say, "Donald Trump is the most unpopular Potus-Elect in the history of the country." Can you say it?

 

Can the Right Sector say, "Unless Donald Trump changes his spots, he will become and by far, the most unpopular Potus to take the oath of office."

 

Can youse guyz say it?

 

It would be a great therapy for you and the rest of the Right Sector to say, "Donald Trump is likely the most unpopular elected president or prime minister in the history of any democratic system of government."

 

Can youse guyz say it, and also say it without saying anything about the person who will not become Potus and who was defeated in this election?

 

Can youse guys over there do this?

 

I thought not. In fact I know you can't say it or anything like it.

Who cares if he is popular or not?

I dont have a problem saying he is the most unpopular candidate to be elected president in my personal opinion or knowledge and 30 years of paying attention to elections. I cant say he is the most unpopular candidate to be elected in the world, ever. How could anybody possibly make that judgement.

Why is that such a big deal for you?

In fact if there was a better candidate to vote for I would have voted for him or her, democrat or republican.

 

 

[Publicus]

Just now, dcutman said:

Who cares if he is popular or not?

I dont have a problem saying he is the most unpopular candidate to be elected president in my personal opinion or knowledge and 30 years of paying attention to elections. I cant say he is the most unpopular candidate to be elected in the world, ever. How could anybody possibly make that judgement.

Why is that such a big deal for you?

In fact if there was a better candidate to vote for I would have voted for him or her, democrat or republican.

 

 

Good to see you put it in reverse. Now shift to forward plse thx.

 

I did not say Trump definitely positively for certain is the most unpopular elected president or prime minister in the history of democracy. I said "likely is".

 

No one here knows for certain and I haven't seen anything that might document that. Nor am I looking. I'd just say it very well might well be the case -- that it probably is the case.

 

It's hard to think of any elected leader who upon his election and assuming of office was as unpopular as Trump is in the here and now among his country's citizens and residents.

 

Very had to think of who other than Donald Trump, anywhere, anytime.

 

There are some similarities with Rouseff in Brazil....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/28/brazil-election-facts_n_6061574.html

[Linzz]

12 minutes ago, Publicus said:

 

Giddy is better than sore.

 

Hooray!

 

So let's present the post as something of a model of some kind going forward.

 

One sees anyway that today there's more of the traditional ribbing going on than the standard trump post election day grumping, scolding, angry white guy winner sorehead 'we're gonna getchuback stuff.

 

Encouraging.

 

That's good Pub. If I can help you along to the 5th stage of grieving, then we are comrades in rivalry 

[Publicus]

10 hours ago, beechguy said:

We always demanded respect for the Office, just not the guy holding it the past 8 years, His track record speaks for itself. Boots on the ground? Yep, trying to clean up a mistake in Irag, among others. I wonder if we'll hear Trump whining and bitching like a little girl for years, about the mess he inherited.

 

We always demanded respect for the Office, just not the guy holding it the past 8 years,

 

Well then get used to the same crap -- this time in the streets and against your guy. By the people in the streets of America across America.

 

The swill against OB for eight years came from the right and its mass of highly financed right wing media. The rejection of your guy Trump is occurring in the streets of the metro areas of the country. Note the difference.

 

Former SecState Clinton is winning big time in the actual count of real Popular Votes which deprives your guy of any popular legitimacy or mandate. Accept the fact. Live with the fact.

 

Youse guyz ought to try to enjoy the present hiatus cause when the honeymoon's over, pow, right to the moon.

[dcutman]

Now if you could just admit to yourself you supported the most flawed candidate in the history of the United States we wouldn't have to keep arguing our points. I suspect you didnt even vote for her, did you?

[Publicus]

1 minute ago, dcutman said:

Now if you could just admit to yourself you supported the most flawed candidate in the history of the United States we wouldn't have to keep arguing our points. I suspect you didnt even vote for her, did you?

 

Same to you as to the other guy I just replied to.

 

Cause it's about Potus-Elect Donald Trump.

 

Rehashing the campaign is the strategy to avoid the present Popular Vote strong majority for Hillary Clinton, and, moreover, going forward.

 

Trump, the most unpopular guy ever to be elected Potus. By far, anywhere, any time.

 

America's Dilma Rouseff down there in Brazil. Trump is however far more unpopular on his election than she was on her reelection. Get used to it.

[Publicus]

4 hours ago, Linzz said:

 

The very electorate you said was not large enough to make a difference. You and the Dems at large were wrong. You lost because you circulate and maintain discourse only with your "high information educated" liberal progressive elite and trash any point of view that does not conform with your own. It's called  walking up your own backside. We've seen it here and looks like we're continuing to see it here. Ma and Pa Kettle triumphed because they were ignored and condescended into meaninglessness. It is interesting that the socialist fair minded justice for minorities representatives of the working class has now become their oppressors.

 

There are always people who need a good rant to get it out of the system so it's okay for now anyway, this one time.

 

Look forward after this to a return to your normal posting that we must comply with your demands to quit our values and beliefs of a lifetime to accommodate your political and socio-cultural beliefs and views.

 

Carry on and resume.

[Publicus]

4 hours ago, NeverSure said:

 

Your side lost. How long ago was it that your side was bashing Trump because he wouldn't 100% guarantee that he'd accept the results of the election? He was concerned about cheating by crooked Democrats.

 

I have no doubt there was Democrat cheating because is many places illegals are allowed to vote with no identification. Trump still won.

 

The real protest was last Tuesday when people came out and said they'd had enough of the crooked, globalist Democrats. The Democrats got skinned alive. Trump beat Crooked Hillary 306 to 232. Landslide.

 

Your efforts would be better placed in cleaning up your corrupt party and getting ready for next time. Oh, and pick a better candidate. Hillary sucks.

 

Cheers.

 

Oh my, another angry winner.

[Linzz]

You make me chuckle Pub, I'll give you that

[Publicus]

12 hours ago, SheungWan said:

 

Both Publicus and you are incorrect. The critical swing was really about the rust belt states. Hardly Ma and Pa pitchfork idealisation. More to do with the working class.

 

The data beg to differ.

 

Trump won US election thanks to the rural vote across the country. The vital difference occurred in three traditionally Blue states that have a total of 46 Electoral College Votes.

 

 

Trump won US election thanks to the rural vote across the country

 

A closer look at where each candidate got their votes reveals how critical the rural vote was for Mr Trump

 

Donald Trump won US election thanks to the rural vote

 

Analysis

 
By Catherine Hanrahan
 

Posted Thu at 1:13pm

Leslie Baum Rossi stands next to a giant Trump placard Photo: Donald Trump won key swing states:  Donald Trump won key swing states thanks to voters in rural areas and small towns.

 

(ABC News: Zoe Daniel)

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-10/donald-trump-us-election-rural-vote/8012874

 

 

My summary:

Trump won outside the cities in Michigan

Of the 3 million total vote in MI, Trump won by 11,837. Last time MI voted Republican for Potus was in 1988. MI has 16 Electoral College Votes.

Regional towns and cities backed Trump in Wisconsin

Of the 2 million total vote in WI, Trump won by 27,257. Last time WI voted Republican for Potus was in 1984. WI has 10 ECVs.

Vote was polarised in Pennsylvania
Of the 5 million total vote in PA, Trump won by 68,236. Last time PA voted Republican for Potus was in 1988. PA has 20 ECVs.

 

The rural vote was up 10% this year.

 

Conversely, black voters did not have a black guy to vote for in this election, so it would be expected black voter participation would be somewhat reduced but still strong for Hillary Clinton.

Reading here btw one easily could be led to believe Democratic Party voters are degenerates hell bent on destroying the United States. As to Republican Ma and Pa Kettle demographic -- which is almost all of it -- they're nice but not funny, parochial rather than cosmopolitan, not big on education or theatre -- and as with Trump, if they had a brain they'd be dangerous.

 

The Ma and Pa Kettle estate. 

 

They too are very likely angry winners, mostly sitting there watching Faux 16 hours a day.

 

It's said Trump voters out there are known to greet each other with the question, "Which weighs more, your wife or the refrigerator?" All in good fun of course.

[tropo]

3 hours ago, dcutman said:

Who cares if he is popular or not?

I dont have a problem saying he is the most unpopular candidate to be elected president in my personal opinion or knowledge and 30 years of paying attention to elections. I cant say he is the most unpopular candidate to be elected in the world, ever. How could anybody possibly make that judgement.

Why is that such a big deal for you?

In fact if there was a better candidate to vote for I would have voted for him or her, democrat or republican.

 

 

 

I don't see that as a problem for Trump. It's how popular he is 100 days/1 year/4 years in that counts. Obama was very popular when he started, but look where he is now.

[dhream]

Meanwhile,  318.9 million (2014) Americans got on with their lives. 

He's a four year POTUS not the frikken Antichrist!

[SheungWan]

8 hours ago, Publicus said:

 

The data beg to differ.

 

Trump won US election thanks to the rural vote across the country. The vital difference occurred in three traditionally Blue states that have a total of 46 Electoral College Votes.

 

 

Trump won US election thanks to the rural vote across the country

 

A closer look at where each candidate got their votes reveals how critical the rural vote was for Mr Trump

 

Donald Trump won US election thanks to the rural vote

 

Analysis

 
By Catherine Hanrahan
 

Posted Thu at 1:13pm

Leslie Baum Rossi stands next to a giant Trump placard Photo: Donald Trump won key swing states:  Donald Trump won key swing states thanks to voters in rural areas and small towns.

 

(ABC News: Zoe Daniel)

 

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-10/donald-trump-us-election-rural-vote/8012874

 

 

My summary:

Trump won outside the cities in Michigan

Of the 3 million total vote in MI, Trump won by 11,837. Last time MI voted Republican for Potus was in 1988. MI has 16 Electoral College Votes.

Regional towns and cities backed Trump in Wisconsin

Of the 2 million total vote in WI, Trump won by 27,257. Last time WI voted Republican for Potus was in 1984. WI has 10 ECVs.

Vote was polarised in Pennsylvania
Of the 5 million total vote in PA, Trump won by 68,236. Last time PA voted Republican for Potus was in 1988. PA has 20 ECVs.

 

The rural vote was up 10% this year.

 

Conversely, black voters did not have a black guy to vote for in this election, so it would be expected black voter participation would be somewhat reduced but still strong for Hillary Clinton.

Reading here btw one easily could be led to believe Democratic Party voters are degenerates hell bent on destroying the United States. As to Republican Ma and Pa Kettle demographic -- which is almost all of it -- they're nice but not funny, parochial rather than cosmopolitan, not big on education or theatre -- and as with Trump, if they had a brain they'd be dangerous.

 

 

The Ma and Pa Kettle estate. 

 

They too are very likely angry winners, mostly sitting there watching Faux 16 hours a day.

 

It's said Trump voters out there are known to greet each other with the question, "Which weighs more, your wife or the refrigerator?" All in good fun of course.

 

What I said was: 'What does seem to have happened is that outside the inner urban areas of those states, the smaller town vote for the DP appears to have jumped ship. We will get further confirmation as the voting figures at a local level are analyzed. '

I am less interested in the total make-up of GOP voters in those states but rather those who switched from DP to GOP. I think we will find that these weren't the pitchforkers but rather the small industry, small town employees who have either lost their jobs or work in towns which have lost substantial jobs.

[Scott]

Off-topic posts and replies removed.

[Morch]

On 11/13/2016 at 11:11 PM, sgtsabai said:

Protest, protest, protest until the fascist orange monster is run out of office tared and feathered on a rail, along with his ultra right wing VP. It isn't about Clinton, it's about the system that allowed such despicable candidates to even run for dawg catcher.

 

If "it's about the system that allowed such despicable candidates to even run for dawg catcher." it would have been more to the point, and more appropriate, to have them prior to the elections, or perhaps even prior to the primary elections. And of course, doubt these specific protestors/rioters would be out in the street if elections went the other way.

[Boon Mee]

This guy is taking the anti Trump protest a little too far we see:

 

Tech company CEO who threatened to assassinate Trump . . . is no longer a CEO

 

 

What a funny guy! This would impress his liberal friends for sure!

Matthew Harrigan, who up until yesterday was CEO of a tech company called PacketSled, took to Facebook in the aftermath of the election and declared his intention to assassinate Donald Trump. Here is a screenshot of his second Facebook post on the matter:

 

 

http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/2016/11/tech-company-ceo-who-threatened-to.html

 

It would appear that the Trump hatred derangement syndrome is out of control! 

[skippybangkok]

I'm guessing the America's freedom of speech does not include such discussions


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

[Scott]

Threatening the President involves violating a specific law against making such threats.   Threats against the President are investigated by the Secret Service.   There are court rulings on the issue which involve the Freedom of Speech aspect.

 

There are also national security issues and national security usually trumps (pardon the pun), everything.  

[JAG]

Will they have to prise his gun from his cold dead hands?

 

Or does that particular interpretation of the second amendment only apply to nutcases on one side of your political divide?

Edited November 17, 2016 by JAG

[Morch]

‘I’m going to kill the President Elect’: A now former CEO explains (and regrets) a Facebook post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/16/a-very-bad-joke-indeed-he-was-a-ceo-until-he-posted-i-am-going-to-kill-the-president-elect/

 

Seems he was already interviewed by the Secret Service, but not arrested.

[joeyg]

On 11/14/2016 at 11:24 AM, Publicus said:

 

Same to you as to the other guy I just replied to.

 

Cause it's about Potus-Elect Donald Trump.

 

Rehashing the campaign is the strategy to avoid the present Popular Vote strong majority for Hillary Clinton, and, moreover, going forward.

 

Trump, the most unpopular guy ever to be elected Potus. By far, anywhere, any time.

 

America's Dilma Rouseff down there in Brazil. Trump is however far more unpopular on his election than she was on her reelection. Get used to it.

FYI Trump won both the popular vote and electoral college.  Just sayin'... http://www.inquisitr.com/3715891/final-vote-count-2016-donald-trump-popular-vote-won-electoral-college-votes-wins-election-hillary-clinton-twitter/

[ravip]

What behavior from a developed country! (and from a CEO)

What a life!

Edited November 17, 2016 by ravip

[Jingthing]

59 minutes ago, joeyg said:

FYI Trump won both the popular vote and electoral college.  Just sayin'... http://www.inquisitr.com/3715891/final-vote-count-2016-donald-trump-popular-vote-won-electoral-college-votes-wins-election-hillary-clinton-twitter/

Why are you intentionally spreading false information? Leave that to the Macedonian teenagers, OK?

 

 

Edited November 17, 2016 by Jingthing

[Morch]

53 minutes ago, joeyg said:

FYI Trump won both the popular vote and electoral college.  Just sayin'... http://www.inquisitr.com/3715891/final-vote-count-2016-donald-trump-popular-vote-won-electoral-college-votes-wins-election-hillary-clinton-twitter/

 

What you linked actually says the opposite with reference to the popular vote. just sayin'

 

The headline of the article is - Final Vote Count 2016: Donald Trump’s Popular Vote And Electoral College Votes Win Election Over Hillary Clinton Claims Viral Twitter Rumor [Debunked]

[Boon Mee]

And it's come to this!

Why are  : Hillary Clinton Supporters Doxxing, Harassing Electoral College Voters?

 

Shameful, aberrant behavior! 

[Luckysilk]

22 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

And it's come to this!

Why are  : Hillary Clinton Supporters Doxxing, Harassing Electoral College Voters?

 

Shameful, aberrant behavior! 

Not to worry once the POTUS starts making America great again they'll take credit as if they had something to do with it.

 

The sooner barry Hussein bama is gone the better.

[Gary A]

Here with this map, you will understand why we have the electoral college. These cities could elect every president if the popular vote was used. As you can see they are mostly democrat controlled cities. That would be an absolute disaster for the country. They are also the sanctuary cities.

[Boon Mee]

You gotta love the ends to which these clueless protesters and Hollywood elite are gnashing their teeth and going into deep depression over the fact of Donald Trump as their duly elected POTUS: