Jump to content

Stay without visa or desert you Children   

127 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Stay without visa or desert you Children

 

follow the Law 

get a <deleted> Visa if you want to stay . Simple as that.

if you cannot migrate to a place legally,.. then you should not be there in the first place.

That is one huge, ginormous problem in my home country. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, madmen said:

Those other embassies didn't panic . OZ ,yanks and poms threw in the towel immediately 

At least your calling them lightweight and not liars.

Posted
1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

At least your calling them lightweight and not liars.

"you're". Flaming bloody ballbags.

Posted
1 minute ago, sanemax said:

You cannot completely  plan for future changes .

No, but you can at least see to that you have i minimum of measly 400k baht tucked away all the time, when you make a choice to live, marry and/or make children in a foreign country. See only one thing needed, not all and completely, and all problems disappeared. If a possibility for that doesn´t exist then moving to another country is not possible from start. when are you people gonna get a grip on reality?

  • Sad 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Huckenfell said:

Its not the 'rules and requirements' but the complete lack of consideration or empathy.

Really? It´s not the rules and requirements, but that the big point people are failing to meet.

Let´s see now. What can you really mean with your reply? Let´s start with consideration, and how that could be udes in this. Do you then mean that sometimes the rules and regulations should not apply to some people? In that case, where do you find a country that do that outside of Thailand?

Quickly over to empathy, and what that might mean. To me it looks like Immigration should feel sorry for some poor bastards that put themselfs in impossible situations. Is that what you mean? Also here, can you please provide me with some other countries where they apply such nice and flexible structure on their Immigration laws?

So, down to the facts. What it all comes down to is the rules and requirements, right?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
1 hour ago, sanemax said:

No it isnt , it is a question that some posters may have to deal with in reality in the future, not another post about how hard it is to get a visa , no .(And no mention of TM30 or 90 day ) 

Meaningless speculation. Pointless questionnaire. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Matzzon said:

Really? It´s not the rules and requirements, but that the big point people are failing to meet.

Let´s see now. What can you really mean with your reply? Let´s start with consideration, and how that could be udes in this. Do you then mean that sometimes the rules and regulations should not apply to some people? In that case, where do you find a country that do that outside of Thailand?

Quickly over to empathy, and what that might mean. To me it looks like Immigration should feel sorry for some poor bastards that put themselfs in impossible situations. Is that what you mean? Also here, can you please provide me with some other countries where they apply such nice and flexible structure on their Immigration laws?

So, down to the facts. What it all comes down to is the rules and requirements, right?

I wonder if they could have "grandfathered" those who had been here maybe ten years, and complied and met requirements, and the new rules applied to all others?

 

Just a thought

 

Posted

Did anyone else catch that he said his kid is not a Thai National?

Please explain... did you knock up  Burma chick,? Cambodian? Etc?... 

If yes, ... it opens up other questions.... 

Is she here on Overstay?  What the hell do you plan as a life for your child even if you could get a Visa?

What happens when mom gets nabbed and sent packin?

  • Sad 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

I wonder if they could have "grandfathered" those who had been here maybe ten years, and complied and met requirements, and the new rules applied to all others?

 

Just a thought

 

Ok, it´s not such a bad thought. What it is, though, is not in face with the real world. I am not completely sure when when the change was regarding the change of sum in financial requirements. They have always been there, though.

If it should be grandfathered then that should be for the once that came when it was ok with lower financials, and one of their children should also be born before the finalcials changed. In that case it could be acceptable to let them stay by showing the old financials. On the other hand you must also consider that prices have gone up and everything is more expensive today. That makes it not such a great idea after all.

And then there are the total nonsense and continuos complaining about all from TM30 to90 day reports. Just follow the rules and do what you are required to do in the country you stay. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

I wonder if they could have "grandfathered" those who had been here maybe ten years, and complied and met requirements, and the new rules applied to all others?

 

Just a thought

 

No, people should have planned ahead for the changes in requirements , its their own fault and they should be deported 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mikisteel said:

Ok I thought about this question all day as you never know what the future brings.

 

Let's take the recent farang nabbed on an 8 year overstay.

 

If this geezer gets blacklisted for a decade and has no way to get his family to his homeland and has some type of plan to make money by hook or crook, If I were him I'd sneak back in, move the family to a new location and keep my head down. 

 

He got to 8 years previously so if he got another 8 that's a good return imo.

 

 

Why not just move them to Laos or cambodia if he cant get back in to thailand? He doesn't need to sneak back in

Posted

Sanemax,  isn’t your son a British citizen?  Shouldn’t you be working on securing that paperwork as it being the most valuable for his future, rather than a stateless existence in a Hill Tribe?  You could bring him back without financial qualifications I’m pretty sure, if he is a citizen, right?  You just can’t bring women back with you.

 

I mean if serious shit is hitting the fan, what is best for the kid???  Mom goes back to hill tribe, you and kid go back to U.K. ....not kid goes to hill tribe???  Then save money and send for his Mother.  Or does the UK have some special provision for stateless people?  Help?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, madmen said:

Why not just move them to Laos or cambodia if he cant get back in to thailand? He doesn't need to sneak back in

What kind of life is his kid going to have there?  He does not have money for private schools, international schools, when he dies, and his kid is stateless and roaming around SE Asia and Mom is too old to attract another old guy to take care of her, then what???

Posted
Tai-Yai  woman without Thai I.D , although can stay in Thailand legally .
Just in the process of getting him and her Thai I.D .
Dont know whether it will be successful or how long it will take though

My sister in Law is Thai Yai
There are many different ethnic groups here in the rai
Everybody’s i.d seems to state they were all born on Jan 1st!
I hope it all works out for you


Sent from my iPad using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Not another post about how hard it is to get a visa, and the TM30, plus 90 day,

posts, enough already.

regards worgeordie

Agree to many repeats 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I am a free American. If Thailand does not want me here, that is a decision made by the Thai people over which I have little or no control. I will go elsewhere where I am welcomed to spend my money in retirement.

  • Like 2
Posted
17 hours ago, HLover said:

Leaving you children would be cruel.  They are you responsibility and you visa problems should be taken care of. For the sake of you loved ones.

Screenshot_2019-07-27-16-39-05.png

being arrested, jailed, fined and deported, blacklisted for a number of years isn't going to help your children. Leaving means you could still find ways of sending money over and being able to visit them.

Posted (edited)

Anyone leaving their children behind, in a black and white scenario, should be stripped of their parenthood right as well.
Obviously I would not leave but take measures to make my temporary illegal stay as safe and short as possible but leaving them behind is no option.
If I go in hiding, I doubt they find me, I am a ghost.

It would be both leaving, as soon the visa is ready. If my wife ever dared to use our child against me, I would ensure her to be taken out first.
Seen enough bad things happen, not on my watch.

Edited by tabarin
Posted

I travel back to the UK to check on my house every 9 months and visit a UK hospital that gives me 9 months of tablets that quite frankly I'd probably die if I didn't take. If I could not get a visa I quite simply would not be able to return to Thailand, die in thailand or if i did I'd overstay 8 months and be banned from returning

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...