Jump to content

Democrats vow to insulate impeachment inquiry from 'sham investigations'


webfact

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO more to do with not being able to find a charismatic candidate acceptable to middle America. Warren- oh my, what are they thinking?

People would never have expected that Obama would be acceptable to middle America, though would they.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nigel Garvie said:

People would never have expected that Obama would be acceptable to middle America, though would they.

Obama is a moderate compared to Warren and Sanders. Obama didn't really get red baited very much. So not the same issue. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2019 at 11:49 AM, Eric Loh said:

Dems just protecting the constitution. Dems have raised more funds than the Reps and should relished the election opportunity. 

Trump has set records in fund raising, how have they raised more?

 

And no, there is nothing they are doing that is about protecting the constitution or the office. But it is setting a precedent that they will regret for decades

Edited by elmrfudd
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2019 at 9:53 PM, bristolboy said:

Talk about dishonest. Is that the article you originally linked to? Wasn't that about special envoys who mediate conflicts in conflict zones? I believe the examples cited in the article you linked to cited Bosnia-Herzegovina and 2 conflicts in southern Africa. 

Anyway, is there any case of a president who makes his special envoy a person who by his own account is involved in this to defend the president. A President who pushes another head of state to consult with this person. A person who is there not to defend the office of the Presidency but to defend Donald Trump. A person who, acting as a defense attorney, is promoting a theory that incriminates a likely opponent of the president? That sounds to me like a high crime or misdemeanour. Very corrupt.

perhaps the better example is FDR's envoy, the socialist Harry Llyod Hopkins that did much more than Rudy or anyone else during a little conflict called world war II

Edited by elmrfudd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Obama is a moderate compared to Warren and Sanders. Obama didn't really get red baited very much. So not the same issue. 

Hmm, not quite my point, which was just to say unexpected things happen, rather than focus on "Red baiting" per se.

 

However I agree with all the last few comments. It is a worry when fighting someone as warped as Trump (Or Johnson), if the opposition choses this moment for a severe attack of "More left than thou" rhetoric. The UK Labour party never fails to indulge in such navel gazing when the people of the country desperately need them to present an electable alternative - tragic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This probably made Trump's day:

 

Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards Beats Trump Pick In Louisiana

 

"“How sweet it is!” a delighted Bel Edwards declared to celebrating supporters, AP reported.  As for Trump, who campaigned vigorously against him, the governor quipped: “God bless his heart.” It’s a phrase southerners often use to politely knock someone.

The narrow victory was widely regarded as a referendum on Trump in a deeply red state."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Becker said:

This probably made Trump's day:

 

Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards Beats Trump Pick In Louisiana

 

"“How sweet it is!” a delighted Bel Edwards declared to celebrating supporters, AP reported.  As for Trump, who campaigned vigorously against him, the governor quipped: “God bless his heart.” It’s a phrase southerners often use to politely knock someone.

The narrow victory was widely regarded as a referendum on Trump in a deeply red state."

It's been even acknowledged by Fox News!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-casts-louisiana-vote-as-impeachment-referendum

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

well now, an opinion of a man passed up by Trump is just that. But you keep on hoping.

 

PS, sorry that I disappointed you 

I'm positively delighted that you've replied although you didn't answer my question.

You stated:

"....i refer to the dimwitted notion of quid pro quo...."

 

I asked, is Napolitano dimwitted too. I.e., he's the dimwit and you're the smart one?

Is that correct?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Becker said:

This probably made Trump's day:

 

Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards Beats Trump Pick In Louisiana

 

"“How sweet it is!” a delighted Bel Edwards declared to celebrating supporters, AP reported.  As for Trump, who campaigned vigorously against him, the governor quipped: “God bless his heart.” It’s a phrase southerners often use to politely knock someone.

The narrow victory was widely regarded as a referendum on Trump in a deeply red state."

just an observation, did the person Trump endorsed get more or less percentage of the vote after the endorsement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

just an observation, did the person Trump endorsed get more or less percentage of the vote after the endorsement?

Well, me and Napolitano are dimwits while you're the smart one so why don't you do the research yourself?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Becker said:

I'm positively delighted that you've replied although you didn't answer my question.

You stated:

"....i refer to the dimwitted notion of quid pro quo...."

 

I asked, is Napolitano dimwitted too. I.e., he's the dimwit and you're the smart one?

Is that correct?

I never said he was dimwitted, he has an opinion, that is all it is. He will be impeached by the house, acquitted in the senate and win another term. one has to wonder what other lame attempts these desperate dims will cook up after the re election. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Deleted post edited out*

 

You claim people who believe there was a quid pro quo are dimwitted.

I believe there was a quid pro quo, ergo I'm dimwitted.

So are you now saying that people who believe in the existing evidence and clealry see a quid pro quo are not dimwitted?

Edited by Scott
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

perhaps the better example is FDR's envoy, the socialist Harry Llyod Hopkins that did much more than Rudy or anyone else during a little conflict called world war II

Was Harry Lloyd Trump's personal attorney who described the purpose of his mission as defending Roosevelt from political attacks? Because if that's the case, then you've got a point. Otherwise, not so much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

I never said he was dimwitted, he has an opinion, that is all it is. He will be impeached by the house, acquitted in the senate and win another term. one has to wonder what other lame attempts these desperate dims will cook up after the re election. 

He pulled out all the stops and still couldn't put the Republican candidate over the top in a deeply red state. And you know why that was? Record black turnout. Trump supporters seem to forget that it isn't only them that Trump motivates to vote. I don't see how all the money in the world is going to immunize Trump from what he's said and what he's tweeted. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sujo said:

It did happen. And yes there is evidence it happened.

no, it did not, but again, if it makes you feel better that you think it did, that is ok. it will amount to nothing but a waste of time, and another increase in fund raising

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

no, it did not, but again, if it makes you feel better that you think it did, that is ok. it will amount to nothing but a waste of time, and another increase in fund raising

Oh so sorry. I didnt know you meant alternative facts.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

those are opinions, not facts. but if that works for you, and it makes you feel like you are going to get what you want or need, go for it

8 minutes ago, Sujo said:

They are facts. Uncontested facts.

 

if they were uncontested, why is there no unanimous vote to impeach? I mean they are "uncontested" right?

 

or are they just partisan blather and bluster??????

 

 

hmmmmm....I wonder what uncontested means.....??

Edited by elmrfudd
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

claiming a quid pro quo when the claimed quid and quo never happened is now "evidence"??

 

if you do not think that is dim, I can't help you out on that.

And that is your "opinion" unsupported by what the hearings have shown.

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump casts Louisiana vote as impeachment referendum

“President Donald Trump returned to the campaign trail Thursday to stump in Louisiana for the second time in as many weeks, using a raucous rally to mock two U.S. diplomats who raised questions about his dealings with Ukraine at the center of an impeachment inquiry. … ‘The people of this country aren't buying it – you see it because we're going up and they're going down,’ Trump said. ‘Let's keep it going for a while.’

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-casts-louisiana-vote-as-impeachment-referendum

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Amulets save teenagers’ lives in Phatthalung shooting

    2. 113

      Running Out Of Money. Need Advice.

    3. 516

      Introduction to Personal Income Tax in Thailand

    4. 443

      The Investing Year Ahead

    5. 21

      Thailand plans 14 new floating solar farms to boost renewable energy

    6. 33

      Thailand Live Thursday 14 November 2024

    7. 74

      Thinking about a sex change before trip to Malaya: Any words of advice?

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...