You still haven't provided proof of insider trading. 700% increase is quite good (it's only 550% for the Nasdaq index), but it's no evidence of insider trading.
If the regulation changes, she cannot be indicted retroactively.
Yet you shared it in the most lazy manner possible, without even so much as an explanation...
What you posted, with an exaggerated headline is alike clickbait - its going to put off any potential sensible viewer.
If his conviction were "final," then he couldn't appeal. A little glossary is just that, and used as shorthand. It's all a little more complicated, which is why I suggested you just use common sense.
Nothing that you quoted supports your belief.... it only illustrates your poor understanding.
Do you have evidence that the NY judge didn't fulfill his duties and sign the judgement delivered by the jury... I'm pretty sure you don't.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now