Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, steve187 said:

i do believe retirement yearly extension holders should be allowed to return.

Non O (retirement) and extensions have been recently added to list of folk able to return.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, fishtank said:

Thai Men have no problem living with their foreign wives.

Also pretty easy to get their Wife Thai citizenship.

 

Not the same for a Thai Woman. her Husband has to go through all kinds of hoops to enable her to live with him.

 

Still don't see how it discriminates against Thai women.

 

Farang men, yes.

 

Or does political correctness not allow straight white men to be discriminated against?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

Everything is relative.

 

20 years in Thailand and married to a Thai lady for the same number of years.

 

I choose the easiest way, for me, for my extension, being :

" Retirement Visa " based on income in homeland : no amount needed in a Thai bank, no monthly transfer of minimum of 65000 ThB needed. 

 

Despite I only have to go one time a year to Immigration ( in fact 2 times, I have to collect my passport the day after), I should like they create a longer type of  Extension, something like 5 years for couples with Thai lady being married for 10 years.

 

So in fact, despite my yearly extension is very easy, I complain that the system could be better.

To paraphrase a well-known God-poster > just an opinion...

< Hehe, insider joke ???? >

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Peter Denis said:

To paraphrase a well-known God-poster > just an opinion...

< Hehe, insider joke ???? >

You were lucky to read it, before it was removed by moderation.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 2009 said:

Still don't see how it discriminates against Thai women.

 

Farang men, yes.

 

Or does political correctness not allow straight white men to be discriminated against?

 

It would be more accurate to say that both the Thai wife and the foreign husband are affected (assuming this is a genuine marriage, and not a marriage of convenience). Which of the two feels most discriminated against will, I guess, depend on which feels most strongly about being deprived of the company of the other.

 

Also affected are any children from the relationship.

 

While on the subject of discrimination, though, I would point out the much greater problem faced by those in same sex relationships. Thailand has hinted at recognising same sex marriages, but it is still true that those under 50 have essentially no appropriate visa to allow them to stay with their same sex partners in Thailand.

  • Like 2
Posted

Personally I don't think what you have said above IS an unpopular opinion and it seems to be the view of others above as well. I've never had issues with Immigration in over 15 years of living here. 

 

Renew retirement Permit takes me about ten-20 minutes depending on the queue- cost B1900, no agent. Yes, I have to go back the next day to collect my passport but so what- they are checking that I have the right to stay. 

 

90 Day reports (which I choose to do in person) 1-5 minutes depending on how many people in front at the drive-thru. 

 

I think the people who do have issues are the ones who are always trying to skirt around the rules. They also tend to be the serial whingers about all the 'bad' things in Thailand and even pick fault when initiatives are announced to try and make things better. Evolution , NOT Revolution is how stuff works here.  My (Phuket) Immigration Office has taken a number of steps over the past few years to improve things and I can't fault them. Hopefully at some point we will see an Immigration Smart Card. That would be a great leap forward and not beyond the bounds of reality.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, fishtank said:

I grudge having to have 400,000 in the bank when a foreign woman married to a Thai man has to have zero in the bank.

Shear discrimination.

 

4 hours ago, 2009 said:

Still don't see how it discriminates against Thai women.

 

Farang men, yes.

I agree with you 2009. At least the Thai wife will have at least 400k to collect should hubby pop his clogs. As for a foreign woman married to a Thai man, who knows ?

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

A year extension not so much hassle, but its not really necessary - why not just issue a 5 year Visa for those Married here etc

In agreement with your entire post regarding some of the sillier situations that arise, as in your own case. However the Thais would want to know that someone getting a visa/extension based on marriage is still actually married. Thus an annual check. Alas the 5 year visa wont happen.

  • Like 1
Posted

   

4 hours ago, 2009 said:

Still don't see how it discriminates against Thai women.

 

14 minutes ago, potless said:

I agree with you 2009.

 

It discriminates against a Thai woman in that she could see her one true love kicked out the country leaving her lonely and heartbroken if for some reason he fails to meet the financial requirements. :coffee1:

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, 2009 said:

 

How's that?

A Thai man's signature has more value than a Thai woman's signature, so he is not required to prove that he can take care of his foreign wife.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Salerno said:

It discriminates against a Thai woman in that she could see her one true love kicked out the country leaving her lonely and heartbroken if for some reason he fails to meet the financial requirements.

Yes that could happen. My point is that a Thai wife may benefit from 400k in a bank. Just the other side of the coin.

Posted

I am basically ok with immigration requirements except I don't see why I should have to have 400K in the bank that I can never use whereas this doesn't apply to anyone married to a Thai. Why are the financial requirements more for single people than for married? That makes no sense!

Apart from that immigration policy is ok except when the IO makes up new rules on the fly.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 hours ago, Airalee said:

That being said, I think that beyond having health insurance, the income approach to retirement visa renewals really shouldn’t have an income requirement that is any higher than the government schools are willing to pay foreign teachers.

Well, the teachers give added value to Thai society, retired peoples' added value is by bringing cash in

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...