Popular Post chilli42 Posted March 20, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 20, 2021 The mind boggles at how shady these guys must be when a pack of shady characters find them too shady even for themselves. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorecard Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 2 hours ago, hotchilli said: Just an amateur then? So seems to me very likely he has a lot more skeletons in the cupboard. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Tracy Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Some would say the PM has a shady background, being a leader of a coup... some would say that someone who was convicted of a drugs offence in a foreign country had a shady background. Some would say someone who collects and shows off watches that he got under dubious circumstances has a shady background... Some would say. I'm not saying that at all, but some would say... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surelynot Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 A little early......should have saved this article for the 1st April 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 20 minutes ago, Surelynot said: A little early......should have saved this article for the 1st April But aren't April fools joke supposed to be a joke whereas Thai politics and politicians are a long way from being funny - - funny is funny, stupid isn't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydebolle Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 It‘s showtime again, let me get the popcorn. The kettle calling the pot black. And no, it was not a ton of heroin; those Australian morons mistook simple household baking flour for heroin and our poor politician had to serve four years in an Aussie slammer over baking flour. He actually can do what he wants; he sits on the little decisive number of MPs which can tilt the government out of a hair thin majority and the big wigs have to follow him whatever he wants, says and/or does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forza2002 Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 OP... The words "Pot, kettle, black" spring to mind when it comes to this Minister... As another poster mentioned, should have saved this story for 1st April.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterwhisper Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 It is so reassuring to realize that this government won't tolerate people with "allegedly" shady backgrounds to be appointed to high positions, let alone hold a ministerial portfolio. Right, Thammanat????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daejung Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 (edited) What about the background of "prime minister" ? Edited March 20, 2021 by daejung Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnative Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Shady backgrounds. Just too easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorecard Posted March 22, 2021 Share Posted March 22, 2021 On 3/20/2021 at 1:01 AM, 2530Ubon said: Oh my. Only in Thailand could this happen. Capt Flour still has to await the constitutional courts ruling on his eligibility as a minister due to his misadventures down-under. People in glass houses shouldn't be throwing rocks around... Why am I surmising that his request to remove the 2 appointees has some personal angle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varun Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 If shady backgrounds became the screening criteria, the Thai Parliament would become a very empty place! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinnock Posted March 23, 2021 Share Posted March 23, 2021 We need to see this from the viewpoint of the person making the complaint. If you're a convicted drug dealer awaiting confirmation of your appointment, and you raise an issue about two other appointments of ineligible people, and the Government does nothing about those appointments - then you've made your point. So nothing to see here, move along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now