Jump to content

Thai Medical Sciences Department approves first 14 batches of locally-produced AstraZeneca vaccine


webfact

Recommended Posts

94Q7VJ.jpg

AFP

 

The first 14 batches of AstraZeneca vaccine, produced by Thai pharmaceutical company Siam Bioscience, have passed the quality tests of the Thai Department of Medical Sciences.

 

The department director-general, Dr. Supakit Sirilak, said that samples of the first five lots of AstraZeneca vaccine and the next nine lots, sent to the department by Siam Bioscience, have met the department’s quality standard, following tests.

 

He said, however, that the department is waiting for a summary production protocol from the drug company before it can issue the release document for use.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/thai-medical-sciences-department-approves-first-14-batches-of-locally-produced-astrazeneca-vaccine/

 

Logo-top-.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

There's always a catch.

 

So when can we expect the document?

 

 

 

"About six million doses of the vaccine are expected to be delivered this month."

 

This is great news.

 

Ooops, we still need just one more bit of red tape...flickering of fingers from behind back! They just cant stop themselves and bow to a sense of urgency can they?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

There's always a catch.

 

So when can we expect the document?

 

 

 

"About six million doses of the vaccine are expected to be delivered this month."

 

This is great news.

 

 

If it's anything like the government offices I have dealt with - anything from 3 weeks to 6 months.

The papers have to be signed by 3 or 4 different people and the one who has to sign is always "not in the office", "travelling on business".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rodknock said:

how many doses in a batch?

pigs fly

Per the manufactured, it's 10.  And has nothing to do with pigs.

 

1 minute ago, worgeordie said:

Read yesterday, they have contaminates in the UK produced Astra Zeneca ,

but I am sure  the Thai produced Vaccine will be better......

regards worgeordie

Most vaccines have had issues.  J&J dump millions.  Russia's had issues.  AZ has had issues.  It's new stuff and they're making them as fast as they can.  And for sure, we need them!

 

Fingers crossed this new manufacturing facility will do well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

OK, so is "batch" a scientific term? Unit of measurement?

 

How many vials (5 ml, 10 doses) in a batch?

 

I searched a bit but it seems like most reports in the press use batch to denote a specific delivery amount.

 

Just once I'd like to see someone offer precise and transparent information.

 

 

Batch is a term to denote that its production is completely independent and verifiable. That's all really

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ourmanflint said:

Batch is a term to denote that its production is completely independent and verifiable. That's all really

Actually that is incorrect. The definition of a batch is thus:-

noun
 
  1. a quantity or consignment of goods produced at one time.
    "a batch of cookies"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nojohndoe said:

Given the urgency it has to be wondered why the Summary Protocol was not supplied with the batch  material !

Presumably because if the batches had not passed muster, then they would potentially have had to go back and make changes to the production protocol.

 

It would make no sense to submit a production protocol summary if it was going to have to be changed.

Edited by GroveHillWanderer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mtls2005 said:

 

There's always a catch.

 

So when can we expect the document?

 

 

 

"About six million doses of the vaccine are expected to be delivered this month."

 

This is great news.

 

I believe that six million figure has been superseded with one of just two million. Unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Presumably because if the batches had not passed muster, then they would very probably have had to go back and make changes to the production protocol.

 

It would make no sense to submit a production protocol summary if it was going to have to be changed.

But the production protocol would need to be checked in any event. Surely a routine matter. It should accompany every batch. Not sure of Siam Bioscience's previous experience in these matters to be honest.

Edited by bradiston
Extra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GroveHillWanderer said:

Presumably because if the batches had not passed muster, then they would very probably have had to go back and make changes to the production protocol.

 

It would make no sense to submit a production protocol summary if it was going to have to be changed.

Except if confident in their product, it would have saved time? And if it had to be changed, nothing lost except some changes to a document?

 

Assuming time is of the essence in these things. Maybe it isn’t. But there IS a pandemic going on.  Don’t know much about summery production protocols tbh. ????‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the last thursday 25th may they have approved 9 batches.

every few days they will approve more, but counting from 1 and calling them "first batches".

That way figures would multiply in public perception like rabbits

" that nine production lots of the AstraZeneca vaccine, manufactured locally by Siam Bioscience, passed quality inspection by the Department on May 25th."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

OK, so is "batch" a scientific term? Unit of measurement?

 

How many vials (5 ml, 10 doses) in a batch?

 

I searched a bit but it seems like most reports in the press use batch to denote a specific delivery amount.

 

Just once I'd like to see someone offer precise and transparent information.

IIRC, earlier reports said there were 1 or 2 million doses in different batches that were submitted for testing. There was no indication in the articles I saw, that the batches were submitted as separate vials, they could have been submitted in a large vat containing all the doses together.

 

Some comments on these earlier reports suggested the numbers might have been incorrect but I don't know whether that's the case or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Presumably because if the batches had not passed muster, then they would potentially have had to go back and make changes to the production protocol.

 

It would make no sense to submit a production protocol summary if it was going to have to be changed.

Which would imply there already exists a detailed production record to refer to for correction of one or more processing steps . The "protocol summary" is exactly that and reference to it by the manufacturer to any variations of all or any  batch can be useful in streamlining future production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Excel said:

Actually that is incorrect. The definition of a batch is thus:-

noun
 
  1. a quantity or consignment of goods produced at one time.
    "a batch of cookies"

 

at one time == completely independent

 

so both are correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...