Here is a link to a spreadsheet that calculates the 7 Day Rolling Average per 100,000 inhabitants in Chiang Mai and Thailand and compares the two by calculating the ratio Thailand / Chiang Mai 7 day averages per 100.000, so you know how much worse or better Thailand is faring as compared to Chiang Mai.

 

I don't know if the spreadsheet will get updated.

 

I like to see the 7 day/100,000 average, since it gives a much better feel than just the raw total number and I wasn't able to find this data on the web before.

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CcdUyi3bxT4DU2qxRo40pgCA-x3jCQHvHfkG6wFaTbI/edit#gid=0

Interesting thanks for sharing. I bet test numbers be a useful metrics as well. 

Deleted- I looked at it incorrectly 

Very useful. Many thanks for posting.

Thanks, Khun Barley !

 

It is interesting to speculate as to what extent sheer population density (per unit area) is a critical factor in rates of incidence of new cases and/or reporting of new cases. Perhaps factoring in the average outside-the-home travel time per unit time, or the average contacts with people per day ?

 

Of course, if CM is sandboxed on August 1 all bets are off (I think a major earthquake is more likely).

 

While I hope the greater CM area never reaches the current incidence rates for BKK, maybe that's wishful thinking; and, as Mark Twain said: "There are two times in a man's life when he should not speculate, when he can't afford it and when he can."

 

cheers ~o:37;

 

 

 

 

On 7/27/2021 at 8:06 PM, Barley said:

I don't know if the spreadsheet will get updated.

It appears to be updating OK!

What the... it's increasing. I wonder when Chiang Mai is going to become dark red zone if the government still refuse to lock Chiang Mai down and prohibit entry from other provinces.

Now also with charts. 

 

One for Chiang Mai, another one for Thailand - new cases and 7 day average.