Jump to content

Change to deposit protection at Thai banks will have little impact


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jacko45k said:

That hardly fits the bill with respect to having a retirement extension. Nor those wishing to self insure against a medical emergency, rather than shelling out 50-100,000 baht every year.

Why not ?

 

One bank for ext.ret.

a second one for self insurance ..... and so further on for different options ....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webfact said:

Accounts over one million baht continue to rise and will be the greatest driver of increases in savings in Thai banks. 

 

Wow!  Really surprising here in the OP article that we have a THAI BANK telling the world that it doesn't really matter that government deposit protection insurance on THAI BANK accounts is being cut from 5 million down to 1 million.

 

Yes, most average Thais probably aren't keeping more than 1 million in their Thai bank account. But they're not the only ones who use Thai banks. And for those who do have larger amounts, the latest change is a real disincentive to keep larger sums on deposit here.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jacko45k said:

It is worse than that, you stated individual accounts in the case of the USA. In Thailand, it will be per individual account holder... ie my 2 accounts with the bank only have a total protection limit of 1M THB.

I believe the limit is (now) 1 million per depositor per bank.  So yes, two different accounts you hold at the same bank company would share the 1 million limit.

 

But, if you had one large account at BKK Bank and another at Krungsri Bank, each would have their own separate 1 million coverage, AFAIK.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So will depositors with large sums in their accounts, open up

more accounts at 1 Million, each or move their funds to Government

banks, Government Housing Bank, Government Savings Bank, and

the other one Agriculture Bank ? * , that would be very welcome for

the Government who seem to be spending like a drunken Sailor .

regards worgeordie      * which are covered a 100 %, unless Govt goes bust ????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nickelbeer said:

That's why I use an agent.

I can see the reasoning... whether to import 65,000 every month or put 800k on deposit, or pay an agent the 12-15,000 is a choice. The latter is an easier life, but some don't like to spend that. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, david555 said:

Why not ?

 

One bank for ext.ret.

a second one for self insurance ..... and so further on for different options ....

Well I lived here for many years with a single bank account... then more recently I was sort of forced to get another.... what a palaver. They don't make it easy...and I do dislike the grumpy lady doing the residence certificates. It just seems stupid to spread the money about like that, unless forced, as we are now being. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nickelbeer said:

That's why I use an agent. I am not importing 65 thousand baht into Thailand merely to get an extension. Agents mitigate that problem quite nicely. While paying 500 dollars to be allowed to spend your money in Thailand is a ripoff, it is my only option until the Covid insanity ends and I can move to more welcoming shores.

How do you manage to spend less that 65,000 each month, we have a house and car and no finance to pay but rarely spend less than that. However I have just checked and yes we did spent less in each of the two previous months. But it hasn't been much fun!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

I believe the limit is (now) 1 million per depositor per bank.  So yes, two different accounts you hold at the same bank company would share the 1 million limit.

 

But, if you had one large account at BKK Bank and another at Krungsri Bank, each would have their own separate 1 million coverage, AFAIK.

 

Yes understood. ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PFMills said:

How do you manage to spend less that 65,000 each month, we have a house and car and no finance to pay but rarely spend less than that. However I have just checked and yes we did spent less in each of the two previous months. But it hasn't been much fun!

I used to think like that, then Covid and lockdowns came to pass.  Now we use it for monopoly.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jacko45k said:

Well I lived here for many years with a single bank account... then more recently I was sort of forced to get another.... what a palaver. They don't make it easy...and I do dislike the grumpy lady doing the residence certificates. It just seems stupid to spread the money about like that, unless forced, as we are now being. 

sometimes to bow the head humble .....makes life simpler ????......(especially in Thailand )

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, david555 said:

sometimes to bow the head humble .....makes life simpler ????......(especially in Thailand )

Well having 4 bank accounts does not sound simpler. I am getting old, one has to k.i.s.s. (ass) a bit. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thai DPA's announcement on the reduction appears to indicate that there are about 1.6 MILLION depositors, or about 2% of nearly 84 million, whose accounts have deposits in excess of the current reduced limit.

 

1.6 million depositors is hardly "little" impact.

 

https://www.dpa.or.th/en/articles/view/deposit-protection-coverage-1-m-baht-per-depositor-per-institution-effective-as-of-11-aug-2021

 

Screenshot_5.jpg.fd92bce63f73f7e59ac0a1ca67c65523.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, darrenr said:

BS ! We are going to have a global crash in the order of 65-80%,the banks know this, before anyone calls me a quak , do you honestly think that given the recent pandemic, insane QE /money printing that there will not be consequences? Inflation will be out of control and the central banks will start to tighten to try and control inflation, Interest rates will rise and crush the economy. Don’t have money in Thai  banks that you can’t afford to lose ! Think Asia Crisis !

We are the most overvalued market since 1929 (Great Depression), do your research if you don’t believe me !

Absolutely agree with you.. we are staring at a potential crash in near future .. don’t know when but be prepared..you have been warned by their actions and those around the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all the banks fail, the value of your 'money' will decrease substantially and there will likely be a lot more to worry about that the government stepping in to reimburse depositors.

 

Where is the government going to get the 'money' from to reimburse people, likely they will print more. Government backing of deposits at banks is a false safeguard at best or an outright scam at worst.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, darrenr said:

BS ! We are going to have a global crash in the order of 65-80%,the banks know this, before anyone calls me a quak , do you honestly think that given the recent pandemic, insane QE /money printing that there will not be consequences? Inflation will be out of control and the central banks will start to tighten to try and control inflation, Interest rates will rise and crush the economy. Don’t have money in Thai  banks that you can’t afford to lose ! Think Asia Crisis !

We are the most overvalued market since 1929 (Great Depression), do your research if you don’t believe me !

Why all the excitement and drama? 

I just read that the IMF has issued another $650B in special drawing rights (SDRs) to cover any central banks liquidity issues. 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g20-finance-imf-reserves-idUSKBN2F404Q

Available August 23.

Problem solved! /s

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boarn said:

Government backing of deposits at banks is a false safeguard at best or an outright scam at worst.

The current Thai DPA system has never really been tested, because its creation came after/as a result of the Asian Financial Meltdown.

 

But in the U.S., by comparison, there's a long history of federal government protections of bank deposits, and that has been tested countless times by numerous bank failures, and it has paid out for covered deposits each and every time, pretty much without fail over decades.

 

So, government deposit insurance of bank accounts certainly can work.... But it depends on the system set up and the government standing behind it.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 2umich said:

So they were waiting for decade to reduce deposit guarantee and decided do it now, when a lot of people unable to pay they debt. Perfect timing. Nothing to worry about.

55555555555555555555554

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Boarn said:

If all the banks fail, the value of your 'money' will decrease substantially and there will likely be a lot more to worry about that the government stepping in to reimburse depositors.

 

Where is the government going to get the 'money' from to reimburse people, likely they will print more. Government backing of deposits at banks is a false safeguard at best or an outright scam at worst.

In Switzerland we have the "too big to fail" policy, but this is very much a false logic and unsustainable, here I am thinking Credit Suisse/UBS. Not sure which banks in Thailand would fit this characteristic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a prior graphic from Standard Chartered Bank that gives you some idea how long the government has been at work trying to whittle down the maximum amounts covered by their deposit insurance. It's been a long, ongoing process stretching back years.

 

The graphic below is a bit off, because I believe they gave an additional one year delay of the date of the reduction to 1 million, which previously was supposed to happen last year, until the current change this year. 

 

Screenshot_6.jpg.034caaeacbd69a1e2dd1e5dadc9240ae.jpg

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I have a joint deposit account of 1 million 600 thousand to cover my 800,000 annual retirement extension.

As this account is in 2 names would that mean government

deposit protection of 2,000,000.  Or is this just wishful thinking. 

Thankyou

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, brucegoniners said:

Oh really? Sounds like wishful thinking from Thai banks, especially since a Thai bank wrote this, lol

 

Of course most Thais don't have a million baht in their account. We do.

 

My wife and I were talking yesterday about opening a second account at another bank to spread our money around and not be over the one million baht threshold. So whether they know it or not, there will be changes.

 

However I doubt it will affect any one bank, since all banks will be affected, losing and gaining from it rather equally.

 

If any banks will benefit it's likely to be some of the lesser known banks who will get deposits they wouldn't otherwise have. Just my humble opinion.

Not sure that will work. I have read that this guarantee is per account holder not per account. If that is so multiple accounts even in different banks, will not help.  Please correct me if I have that wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...