Jump to content

Proposal to legalise porn in Thailand suffers setback


webfact

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Karma80 said:

What a circus of hypocrisy. 
I feel sad. Maybe I shall go console myself by inviting a couple of girls from Patong to a movie night using a VPN with a boat load of booze I can't buy from a bar, followed by high quality conversation into the small hours.

Sounds like a plan.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webfact said:

Sonthiya Sawasdee from Thailand’s House committee on law, justice and human rights .... 

 

1 hour ago, webfact said:

However, Mr Sonthiya warned that any MP who supports the proposal could be in breach of parliamentary ethics.

I presume that a Rule-Book has been written on "Thai Parliamentary-Ethics".

 

And I presume that Mr Sonthiya is a Lawyer.

 

 --  If he is, then I would have expected that he would *know* whether or not an MP's support for the Proposal is in breach of Parliamentary-Ethics.

 

 

Edited by andersonat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

What a load of toss, politicians and ethics, yeah right...

Yeah, that thought crossed my mind also.  I don't think the holdup has anything to do with ethics.  I suspect that the reason witnesses have not been asked to come forward is that no one in parliament will bar fine them out.

 

I could be quite embarrassing if some of the witnesses actually recognised and found they were on a first name basis with some honorable members of parliament.

Perhaps a flight of fancy but I can just imagine "HI POOPSIE" ringing across the hallowed halls of justice.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Mr Sonthiya warned that any MP who supports the proposal could be in breach of parliamentary ethics.

Is being a convicted drug smuggler not a breach of parliamentary ethics? 

 

So, MPs can't debate anything that Mr Sonthiya disagrees with as it would be breach of parliamentary ethics? Can he show the public the relevant section of the law that supports his hypothesis? Would it be against the 'parliamentary ethics' (a classic example of an oxymoron) if MPs debated whether he should be removed from his post?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

Everything is set back in Thailand... Same sex marriage, sex toys, porn video's, but in the family resort Pattaya and Patong in Phuket there is live porn where there is never a problem in the bars. Even the hostesses at events are too sexy, but if you want to watch porn at home on TV or internet it is forbidden...Strange country rules

Simple rule: everything visible is forebidden. Why do you think Thai cars have blackened windows?

 

6 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

Everything is set back in Thailand... Same sex marriage, sex toys, porn video's, but in the family resort Pattaya and Patong in Phuket there is live porn where there is never a problem in the bars. Even the hostesses at events are too sexy, but if you want to watch porn at home on TV or internet it is forbidden...Strange country rules

Simple rule: everyrhing that goes against make-believe ethics is forbidden, but don't look behind the screens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...