Jump to content

House committee slams Thai police for arresting, defrocking Cambodian monk


Recommended Posts

Posted

1cabf0d6-ae35-4a66-b37b-3decb6dfb75e.jpg

Photo from Radio Free Asia

 

Thailand’s House committee, tasked with scrutinising a bill against torture and enforced disappearances, has cried foul over Tuesday night’s arrest and defrocking of a monk by Thai immigration police, prior to his deportation back to Cambodia.

 

The committee’s spokesperson, who is also deputy spokesperson of the Democrat party, Siripa Intavichein, told the media at the parliament today (Thursday) that the committee received a complaint from on behalf of the Cambodian monk about his arrest and the fact that he has been granted refugee status, adding that she has received confirmation from both the UNHCR (UN Refugee Agency) office in Thailand and Human Rights Watch of the monk’s situation.

 

Siripa further said that the Swiss embassy in Bangkok has issued an emergency visa for the monk to seek refuge in Switzerland, to avoid being deported back to Cambodia, where he faces an uncertain but possibly dangerous future.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/house-committee-slams-thai-police-for-arresting-defrocking-cambodian-monk/

 

Logo-top-.png
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Aussie999 said:

UNHCR Thailand should be shamefully closed, as an insult to humanity.

Care to explain. They do try and stand up for peoples rights including migrants but this country, as much as they say they care, do not.  The only think this Government is concerned with is the ranking they recieve and the condemnation on the annual trafficking of persons report.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

Just wondering what he did in Cambodia that forced him to flee and seek refugee status in another country?

It is his level of Buddhism and the way he speaks out that has created the hostility towards him in Cambodia as well as here.  They say he does not act like a Monk.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The linked article makes no mention of whom allegedly defrocked the monk. However, the ASEANNOW.com byline appears to indicate the Thai Police defrocked the monk. If so,  that would be inappropriate as such would be the duty of the Thailand Council of Buddhists to initiate such an action.

But the monk is from Mynamar where he likely was initiated as a monk (really unknown where). From that perspective it would seem a Mynamar Buddhist oversight council would be the authority to defrock the monk.

So the frocking story is confusing.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Srikcir said:

the Thai Police defrocked the monk

The monk had already been defrocked by the Cambodian authorities, ergo he was fraudulently posing as a monk whilst in Thailand, hence the need to get him to take off monastic robes.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Aussie999 said:

UNHCR Thailand should be shamefully closed, as an insult to humanity.

Just as all the Western based human rights organizations might be. 

Are we beginning to learn that they all come from the same spawn and act accordingly? 

Posted
1 hour ago, Oxx said:

The monk had already been defrocked by the Cambodian authorities, ergo he was fraudulently posing as a monk whilst in Thailand, hence the need to get him to take off monastic robes.

Thanks, that needed to be stated in the article. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Srikcir said:

The linked article makes no mention of whom allegedly defrocked the monk. However, the ASEANNOW.com byline appears to indicate the Thai Police defrocked the monk. If so,  that would be inappropriate as such would be the duty of the Thailand Council of Buddhists to initiate such an action.

But the monk is from Mynamar where he likely was initiated as a monk (really unknown where). From that perspective it would seem a Mynamar Buddhist oversight council would be the authority to defrock the monk.

So the frocking story is confusing.

I agree, I don't believe the Thai immigration police have the authority to de-frock him.  

Posted
21 hours ago, Srikcir said:

The linked article makes no mention of whom allegedly defrocked the monk. However, the ASEANNOW.com byline appears to indicate the Thai Police defrocked the monk. If so,  that would be inappropriate as such would be the duty of the Thailand Council of Buddhists to initiate such an action.

But the monk is from Mynamar where he likely was initiated as a monk (really unknown where). From that perspective it would seem a Mynamar Buddhist oversight council would be the authority to defrock the monk.

So the frocking story is confusing.

Confusing yes, but certainly gets a lot of attention/clicks and advertising mileage .

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Srikcir said:

Thanks, that needed to be stated in the article. 

But conveniently left out, see previous post. 

Edited by Artisi

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...