ICE vs EV, the debate thread

[transam]

1 minute ago, KhunLA said:

I know a lot about ICEVs, since owning more than a few, and worked on them extensively. 

 

Know plenty about the Celerio also, and why I would never own one, even if having limited finances, as better available for same price point.

Total rubbish, you know lot's about the Celerio, you've only just found out how to spell it.......🤣

[josephbloggs]

Ok, I'll give it one more go then I'll stop feeding as this is pointless and a waste of time. You really do have comprehension issues. I am sure it is deliberate to troll people or maybe you only understand things that are written in emojis.

 

Quote

 YOU criticized your own car choice as it has CVT............😂

I didn't criticise my choice of car - it's perfect for the job. I said it has a nasty CVT which it does: ALL CVTs are nasty and soulless. But for the job of getting my wife and kids to school and back it does an excellent job, and a CVT makes sense in that vehicle. I just don't like CVTs.

 

Quote

 Another mistake, I do not OWN a car...........😂

Another comprehension mistake on your behalf. I said "in your family". I assume you count your wife and son as being family.

 

Quote

 So A BMW X1 is a bottom of the range SUV.........😂

Yes, it is, especially the diesel variant.

[KhunLA]

5 minutes ago, transam said:

Say's a Chinese MG owner, you can't make this sh_t up....................😆................

Which one would you prefer to drive ... be honest if you can ... 

 

[richard_smith237]

7 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

be honest if you can ... 

 

Being honest - neither. Given the amount of choice out there we can't just be limited to these. 

 

Here's a quick list from AI...   from any of the 'small cars'.... I'd be looking at the Chery EQ1 EV... (in fact, I might swap my motorcycle for one !!!)....

 

 

 

 

[4myr]

3 hours ago, transam said:

It would seem that many of you EV-ers here, going by this EV thread, are very interested in the Celerio (which is Latin for Swift), so may I suggest you go book a test drive..............

 

 

 

Before you follow our beloved budget car expert's advice, please do your due diligence where your Celerio has been produced. There are some which can be regarded as fuel efficient driving coffins. There is no record of NCAP rating that proves that the Rayong produced Celerio's do not have the same deficiencies as the Indians.

 

Quote

 

According to recent crash tests conducted by Global NCAP, the Maruti Suzuki Celerio safety rating has raised concerns among safety-conscious buyers. The Celerio received a zero-star rating for adult occupant protection and just one star for child occupant safety. These results highlight several safety deficiencies in the Celerio, particularly regarding occupant protection during a crash.

 

 

[transam]

45 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Which one would you prefer to drive ... be honest if you can ... 

 

Don't be silly...........🙄

 

 

[transam]

21 minutes ago, 4myr said:

 

Before you follow our beloved budget car expert's advice, please do your due diligence where your Celerio has been produced. There are some which can be regarded as fuel efficient driving coffins. There is no record of NCAP rating that proves that the Rayong produced Celerio's do not have the same deficiencies as the Indians.

 

 

So............?  

 

 

[KhunLA]

57 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Being honest - neither. Given the amount of choice out there we can't just be limited to these. 

 

Here's a quick list from AI...   from any of the 'small cars'.... I'd be looking at the Chery EQ1 EV... (in fact, I might swap my motorcycle for one !!!)....

 

 

 

 

More about his anti MG/CN stance, since making note of me owning MG from CN, and has repeated his distain for.

 

Don't tell him, many of the components in the Celerio made from steel from  CN.  As do so many vehicles since CN is the largest export of steel.

 

[richard_smith237]

6 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

More about his anti MG/CN stance, since making note of me owning MG from CN, and has repeated his distain for.

 

Don't tell him, many of the components in the Celerio made from steel from  CN.  As do so many vehicles since CN is the largest export of steel.

 

 

 

Your passionate advocacy for MG vehicles, often feels so entrenched in its own echo-chamber that it becomes challenging to take your views on EVs, particularly MGs, at face value.

 

It’s easy to present heavily biased information sourced from questionable origins, but achieving true balance is far more difficult when arguing from a position of bias. For instance, you criticised the Celerio’s safety performance while comparing it to a car that similarly lacks NCAP or ACAP ratings for the 2024 model - at least none that are readily available.

 

Moreover, you seem to double down on tangential points, such as the “steel stat” mentioned earlier, as though it fortifies your argument when in reality, it diverges entirely. By this logic, you might next argue that China’s dominance in global semiconductor production somehow validates MG’s superiority. Yes, much of the world’s manufacturing is rooted in China; that’s common knowledge. But citing this does little to address someone’s valid preference for another manufacturer, such as Suzuki.

 

It’s not necessarily disdain for MG or Chinese manufacturing that prompts objections, but rather the overt and repetitive bias in your presentation. I’ve teased you in the past about your palpable enthusiasm for MG, not because I harbour a personal dislike for the brand (though, admittedly, I’m not a fan), but because your overzealous advocacy often tips the scales too far with bias.

 

For example, while MG vehicles may offer competitive pricing, they are not inherently superior to their European, Japanese, or Korean counterparts. Their appeal largely stems from affordability, which is why you chose one.

 

Let’s be honest, if Tesla, Kia, or VW were priced equivalently to MG, it’s unlikely MG would have been your first choice.

 

You’ve made your decision based on personal preference, which is perfectly valid. However, the volume of cherry-picked and unbalanced commentary you share often weakens rather than strengthens your argument.

 

Sometimes, it’s enough to simply state: I like MG because they’re well-priced for what they offer. The same can be said for the Celerio and countless other vehicles within that price range.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[4myr]

Is a range of 420 km WLTP enough for long road trips in Thailand?

 

YES,

- my average speed on main roads is not more than 80-90 km/hr

- my bladder is more the limiting factor

- there are enough fast chargers on Thai main road network to stop and charge for more than 200 km not longer than 40 minutes

- in the latest EU survey, almost half of non BEV drivers want more than 500 km range, while 84% of BEV drivers are OK with their current range

 

NO,

- my ICE car can drive 500 km without refueling, so why do I have to compromise

- if my bladder asks me to stop, I don't need to stop for more than 15 minutes

- I don't need to stop for coffee or a snack cause I have my onboard pantry in my car

- my car engine is powerful enough to challenge the speed limit, so I can finish my journey faster

 

[KhunLA]

1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

 

Your passionate advocacy for MG vehicles, often feels so entrenched in its own echo-chamber that it becomes challenging to take your views on EVs, particularly MGs, at face value.

 

It’s easy to present heavily biased information sourced from questionable origins, but achieving true balance is far more difficult when arguing from a position of bias. For instance, you criticised the Celerio’s safety performance while comparing it to a car that similarly lacks NCAP or ACAP ratings for the 2024 model - at least none that are readily available.

 

Moreover, you seem to double down on tangential points, such as the “steel stat” mentioned earlier, as though it fortifies your argument when in reality, it diverges entirely. By this logic, you might next argue that China’s dominance in global semiconductor production somehow validates MG’s superiority. Yes, much of the world’s manufacturing is rooted in China; that’s common knowledge. But citing this does little to address someone’s valid preference for another manufacturer, such as Suzuki.

 

It’s not necessarily disdain for MG or Chinese manufacturing that prompts objections, but rather the overt and repetitive bias in your presentation. I’ve teased you in the past about your palpable enthusiasm for MG, not because I harbour a personal dislike for the brand (though, admittedly, I’m not a fan), but because your overzealous advocacy often tips the scales too far with bias.

 

For example, while MG vehicles may offer competitive pricing, they are not inherently superior to their European, Japanese, or Korean counterparts. Their appeal largely stems from affordability, which is why you chose one.

 

Let’s be honest, if Tesla, Kia, or VW were priced equivalently to MG, it’s unlikely MG would have been your first choice.

 

You’ve made your decision based on personal preference, which is perfectly valid. However, the volume of cherry-picked and unbalanced commentary you share often weakens rather than strengthens your argument.

 

Sometimes, it’s enough to simply state: I like MG because they’re well-priced for what they offer. The same can be said for the Celerio and countless other vehicles within that price range.

Bias I am .. although, also pointed out annoyances of.   Stated more than a few times, BEVs aren't for everyone, for a variety of reasons.   Thankfully, none of those apply to us.

 

If you can't charge at home, and an inpatient person, and don't care to be inconvenience to go charge, as I certainly would be, then no, BEV not for you.

 

Actually the ICEV presents that problem for us, living kind of rural.  To top up the ICE version of the ZS we had, it was a special trip to the petrol station, as not along any of our daily route.  Worst, involving u-turns, as on hwy #4, and always crowded.  5-10 mins after arriving before getting change and leaving.  NO THANKS.  

 

If had to do that, and CS might not be within 10 kms, then no.  Though hard to believe, if that rural, you can't charge at home.  

 

Loved our ICE ZS, and playing long game for my wife 22 yrs younger, me 70, and ain't going to be around a whole lot longer, upgrading to the BEV, saves her of any future hassle of maintaining and or buying another ICEV.   She loves the 2020 & 2022 ZS more than I do.  I was leaning towards the MG Extender  in 2020 

 

But the basic, MT model, and, being diesel, that wasn't going to happen.  Something I couldn't bring myself to own.  Want the MG E-pick up, but she said stupid to have 2 vehicles, because "We ain't selling the ZS" 

 

Can't argue that logic ... bi-atch

 

Price point was a big factor, as not a car person, and I think the prices for both ZSs was silly as hell, to go from point A to B.  If not for the govt incentive, we'd still be quite happy with the ICE version.  Still ignorant about the BEV performance ... so ignorant is bliss, would apply, and we'd never know what we were missing.

 

2020, what was on offer, and only the 'made in TH' cars at the 695k price point of the ZS, then there really wasn't any comparison.  Sure they're all decent cars, with good drivetrains, and will last for few 100k kms, hopefully.  But the ZS was a cut above, and I need a taller SUV, not a sedan, that's called a SUV.  Getting in/out of the ZS is a breeze.  We test drove almost everything that was available, in the <700k price point.

 

I wasn't spending more for 4 wheels, as first 3 cars, served well, but were basically crap, to be honest.  Especially on the highway.

 

I only go on about the ZS, as that is all the personal experience I have with BEVs.   Unlike the anti BEV folks, with little to no experience.  If you've never test drove one, you really shouldn't comment about BEVs.

 

I only reply to posts, the anti folks, to correct the ignorance and bias, false narratives, they spew, so anyone on the fence, isn't swayed by their ... BS ... IMHO