Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Ketanji Brown Jackson sworn in as first black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I do apologise for my mistake , I should have said "the two reasons" , rather than the "sole reason"

But there were other criteria too, like qualifications and experience.

 

A selection screening that resulted in such an excellent candidate.

 

  • Replies 220
  • Views 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Anything is better than Trumps Ultra Right Wing conservatives.   Religious zealots on the Supreme Court are like the Taliban extremist in Afghanistan. 

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    A welcome return to appointing Justices who are qualified for the post.

  • VillageIdiot
    VillageIdiot

    "A welcome return..."    You're joking, of course. When in American history were Supreme Court nominations anything other than crass attempts at pushing forward some faction's political or s

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

I didn't say she was asked to make a judgement though...........

No, but that was the excuse she gave for not answering the question , that she is a Judge and judges need to hear what the prosecution and defendants have to say and she makes judgement 

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

No, but that was the excuse she gave for not answering the question , that she is a Judge and judges need to hear what the prosecution and defendants have to say and she makes judgement 

And what exactly is your problem with that?

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And what exactly is your problem with that?

I do think that she should have honestly answered the question 

Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

No, but that was the excuse she gave for not answering the question , that she is a Judge and judges need to hear what the prosecution and defendants have to say and she makes judgement 

Its not a basic yes and no answer, it needs a lot of context unless you going to be there with different scenarios for a few hours, he was baiting her and she knew it, so did everybody else. You do know there are many complexities its not black and white:

 

There being at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous and the different markers don’t always align. 

 

 "In any particular case of sex categorization, whether in law or in science, it is necessary to build a definition of sex particular to context."

 

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

She did,

Well yes, she did answer the question with some deflective words , but she didn't answer the question posed to her

Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

Well yes, she did answer the question with some deflective words , but she didn't answer the question posed to her

She did give an answer. She's entitled to answer as she see fit. She didn't lie, unlike the last 2 Trump nominees.

 

 

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Well yes, she did answer the question with some deflective words , but she didn't answer the question posed to her

She answered perfectly without embroiling herself in rightwing culture wars.

 

She’s clearly s very savvy lady.

3 hours ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

 

See the bigger picture. Think how women and blacks were treated in 1962 and what has been achieved in 60 years . 

<snip for brevity>

That's what upsets these people.

  • Author

A long series of off-topic posts about voter ID and voting requirements have been removed. The topic here is about the new U.S. Supreme Court justice.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.