Jump to content

Biden pardons thousands for ‘simple possession’ of marijuana


Scott

Recommended Posts

The number of people affected by Biden's pardon from federal prison for possession of marijuana may provide only limited advantage. Remember the pardon doesn't apply to state convictions.

 

The US Sentencing Commission shows that in 2017 only 92 people were sentenced for marijuana possession out of a total of nearly 20,000 convictions! 

 

At the federal level 81,900 prisoners in September 2016 were convicted of drug offenses, but more than 99% were sentenced for trafficking (my note - "simple possession implies "personal use").

June 2019

https://washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/

 

So for a person convicted of possession of marijuana in federal court along with other serious drug offenses, there might only be a nominal reduction in their sentence. They should remain in jail.

 

But Biden does set an example and that may motivate state citizens to push for similar drug policies.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Nobody was freed. The pardon only applied at the federal level and there was no-one in federal prison for simple marijuana possession at the time the pardon was issued.

 

All it did was vacate some historical convictions.

He is actively advocating that it be done at the state level. US presidents aren't dictators (not yet anyway) so he has done all he can at the executive level. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Yeah, I'm not saying it was a bad thing, just that it didn't actually free anyone who was still in prison.

Away with you and your trolling nonsense.

 

If Biden enacted a presidential order that you really disagreed with you’d be claiming it’s all his own idea, with nobody else whatsoever involved in his decision.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Campaign pledge make and fulfilled contrasting with pledge that Mexico will pay for the wall (unfinished) and never happened. Will boost some Dems in the mid-term who have been rising the issue of marijuana legalization central to their campaign. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Away with you and your trolling nonsense.

 

If Biden enacted a presidential order that you really disagreed with you’d be claiming it’s all his own idea, with nobody else whatsoever involved in his decision.

Is that actually aimed at me? My post was not in any way critical of Biden.

 

Perhaps you were meaning to reply to the post that implied this wasn't Biden's idea?

 

That was @proton, not me

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, in the UK.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11277213/Police-commissioner-calls-cannabis-raised-Class-drug-par-heroin-cocaine.html

 

A Tory Police and Crime Commissioner has called for cannabis to be reclassified as a Class A substance, on a par with heroin and cocaine. 

Dorset Commissioner David Sidwick told the Tory party conference yesterday: ‘We need tough sanctions for possession and to halt the drive towards decriminalisation.’ 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really excellent news. Biden doing more good work for the people. The Feds in the US have continued to back insanely dumb and fruitless anti cannabis laws for decades now. Millions of lives have been devastated by this stupid policy. It is time for a federal official to stand up to the DEA, a toxic, creepy, and wasteful organization, that accomplishes very little, yet sucks so much in the way of resources from the treasury. Now, it is time to empty all prisons of anything related to ganga, and lock up, or severely punish some overly zealous DEA officials. 

Edited by spidermike007
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to be clear here's a little about who will benefit:

 

The New York Times reported that the pardons will affect about 6,500 people convicted of simple marijuana possession between 1992 and 2021 under federal law, as well as thousands more under DC code, White House officials said on a call with reporters

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...