Republicans announce investigation into Joe Biden !

[rattlesnake]

2 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

Why do you post a link that does not support your claim in any shape or form??

Because I'm a moron, Phoenix.

[placeholder]

37 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

The FBI is a corrupt establishment and I don't see why you would persist in denying that.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/10/11/politics/steele-dossier-fbi-durham-danchenko/index.html

William Barr appointed John Durham as special prosecutor to prove that the FBI was corrupt. Guess what? Durham failed. And it only took him 3 years to get there.

[Sheryl]

Posts that were off-topic, trolling and/or homophobic - and replies to same - have been removed.

[billd766]

2 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

You're referring to my claim that the Biden family is a family of dysfunctional and crooked perverts?

 

Well, I have read the Marco Polo report on Hunter's laptop. The evidence on it is incontrovertible and anyone with a bit of morality and sanity can only concur this is a seriously twisted, screwed up lot.

 

I can PM you the report but I am pretty sure you don't want to hear about it as it is not from an "approved" source. That's your right, however please spare me the "misinformation" BS newspeak.

 

It will be published soon enough though so I would choose my worlds wisely nonetheless.

So you have nothing that can be regarded as a verifiable source? 

 

It will be published soon enough. Really?? How soon.

 

This month, next month, next year, the 31st February 2050?

 

You have nothing verifiable, yet you still expect people to believe you.

 

IMHO you are nothing but a sad lonely troll, and certainly not worth me wasting my time on.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

This is really not going to age very well ????

It’s going to age a lot better that the GOP Hunter Biden fixation.

 

’Chain of Custody’ is a critical issue in determining what is and what is not ‘evidence’.

 

The Republicans would be well advised to give up on this lunacy and try instead to come up with some policies that might attract swing voters.

 

Refer midterm election results for reasons why.

[Laphroaig27]

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

So far, those conspiracies seem to be dead on...

 

Evidence?

Well, to cover all the Biden family conspiracies I'd first direct you to THE ARTICLE

[Chomper Higgot]

Just now, Laphroaig27 said:

THAT happened and guilt was admitted.

 

We have no idea what will come now that the GOP has taken the house. At least the Jan 6 circle jerk is over. Pure hyperbolic, partisan speculation on your part

Sorry, please accept my apologies if I’ve been a bit ‘assertive’ in my responses.

 

I mistook your posts as having a familiar ring to them, but my bad, I hadn’t realized you are a brand new member and therefore perhaps deserving of a little softer responses.

 

Anyway, welcome to the forum, you’ll soon catch on how it goes.

[rattlesnake]

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

So you have nothing that can be regarded as a verifiable source? 

 

It will be published soon enough. Really?? How soon.

 

This month, next month, next year, the 31st February 2050?

 

You have nothing verifiable, yet you still expect people to believe you.

 

IMHO you are nothing but a sad lonely troll, and certainly not worth me wasting my time on.

Im used to being insulted here, its either that or claims about my mental health.

The reason I post on this forum occasionally is that I find it very interesting, from a sociological and psychological viewpoint. Looking forward to your laughing emoticon.

[metisdead]

Off topic posts about the Ukraine war, the Steele dossier, Hillary Clinton have been removed as well as the replies. 

[Bkk Brian]

1 hour ago, Laphroaig27 said:

Well, to cover all the Biden family conspiracies I'd first direct you to THE ARTICLE

I did and can confirm with you they are indeed unproven conspiracey theories against the Biden family

[mikebike]

On 11/18/2022 at 12:25 PM, ozimoron said:

Specifically the FBI who inexplicably have not pressed charges yet.

Against whom?

[mikebike]

28 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Im used to being insulted here, its either that or claims about my mental health.

The reason I post on this forum occasionally is that I find it very interesting, from a sociological and psychological viewpoint. Looking forward to your laughing emoticon.

No ya got my laughing emote... nothing funnier than some internet rando saying they are doing psycho/social research... my sides are bursting!

[talahtnut]

The Biden bunch are going down the pan for sure,

too much evidence from 'unapproved sources', but which

the Republican side certainly do approve of.

Their worst crime is what they have done to the American people.

I know because I was sent to an approved school in the UK.

[heybruce]

3 hours ago, talahtnut said:

The Biden bunch are going down the pan for sure,

too much evidence from 'unapproved sources', but which

the Republican side certainly do approve of.

Their worst crime is what they have done to the American people.

I know because I was sent to an approved school in the UK.

Right.  I expect the Republican's investigations of Biden to be just as productive as their endless investigations of Benghazi.  ????

[ozimoron]

3 hours ago, mikebike said:

Against whom?

Anyone except Trump and his mob.

[placeholder]

This is how the Republicans on the House Committe for Oversight and Reform are justifying their investigation of the Biden family:

 

“Republicans’ inquiry quickly established that few in the President’s extended family have failed to capitalize on their relationship with Joe Biden.”

“From Valerie Biden Owens, the President’s ‘sister, confidante, and longtime political strategist,’ penning a book about the Biden family shortly after the inauguration to Francis ‘Frank’ Biden ‘promot[ing] his relationship to the commander-in-chief in an Inauguration Day advertisement for the law firm he advises[,]’ the Biden family’s monetization of the President’s time in Washington is well documented.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/18/fox-news-republicans-house-hunter-biden/

 

This is ridiculous.

[ozimoron]

9 hours ago, placeholder said:

This is how the Republicans on the House Committe for Oversight and Reform are justifying their investigation of the Biden family:

 

“Republicans’ inquiry quickly established that few in the President’s extended family have failed to capitalize on their relationship with Joe Biden.”

“From Valerie Biden Owens, the President’s ‘sister, confidante, and longtime political strategist,’ penning a book about the Biden family shortly after the inauguration to Francis ‘Frank’ Biden ‘promot[ing] his relationship to the commander-in-chief in an Inauguration Day advertisement for the law firm he advises[,]’ the Biden family’s monetization of the President’s time in Washington is well documented.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/18/fox-news-republicans-house-hunter-biden/

 

This is ridiculous.

This is why both those sources are unapproved here.

[ozimoron]

3 hours ago, talahtnut said:

The Biden bunch are going down the pan for sure,

too much evidence from 'unapproved sources', but which

the Republican side certainly do approve of.

Their worst crime is what they have done to the American people.

I know because I was sent to an approved school in the UK.

The problem with those "unapproved sources" is that they can't get their evidence before the courts either. Lawyers who try to do so tend to get sanctioned. So, either the evidence is bad and the allegations frivolous or the judges are totally corrupt and the bar is not sanctioning them. Take your pick.

[Scott]

An improperly formatted post and replies have been removed. 

 

[rattlesnake]

5 hours ago, mikebike said:

No ya got my laughing emote... nothing funnier than some internet rando saying they are doing psycho/social research... my sides are bursting!

I never mentioned social research, I said I found some posters here very interesting from a sociological perspective.

 

You're very smart, right? So you get the nuance.

[thaibeachlovers]

12 hours ago, scorecard said:

Reality is that trump should have been investigated before being allowed anywhere near any money when he started his presidency.

 

Further the hundreds of millions he skimmed off of donations for other causes should also have been investigated.

 

Plus he should have been investigated for the hundreds of millions he scammed off students who signed up for his fake university.

 

And the list continues...

POTUS don't have access to the "money". Congress ( the house ) control the money supply.

[thaibeachlovers]

8 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

Im used to being insulted here, its either that or claims about my mental health.

The reason I post on this forum occasionally is that I find it very interesting, from a sociological and psychological viewpoint. Looking forward to your laughing emoticon.

I have to agree with that, including the reference to being insulted. It's become especially "interesting" since 6 years ago.

[bendejo]

How impressive!  Those GOP guys sure are strict when it comes to truth, corruption, and justice.  But only in people who are not part of their party.  

The 1/6 insurrection was a well-behaved tour group looking for the Capitol gift shop.  The attack on Paul Pelosi was a Halloween prank.

How can these people be trusted to make any kind of judgement call?  

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

11 minutes ago, bendejo said:

How impressive!  Those GOP guys sure are strict when it comes to truth, corruption, and justice.  But only in people who are not part of their party.  

LOL. One could substitute Democrat for GOP and it would be equally true.

[ozimoron]

33 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. One could substitute Democrat for GOP and it would be equally true.

 Would it? How many of Obama or Biden's cronies were indicted and convicted or pardoned? And it isn't just Trump. GOP officials from all over have been going down like flies.

[nauseus]

Not much changes on here eh? A topic line that includes the only name as Biden but with ~ 50% responses about Trump. 

[thaibeachlovers]

28 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Not much changes on here eh? A topic line that includes the only name as Biden but with ~ 50% responses about Trump. 

Perhaps, like Dr Strangelove, they just can't help themselves.

[LosLobo]

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

POTUS don't have access to the "money". Congress ( the house ) control the money supply.

Yet, Trump used POTUS emergency powers to fund the building of the big, beautiful wall which Mexico never paid for, against the wishes of Congress.

 

[Saanim]

24 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Yet, Trump used POTUS emergency powers to fund the building of the big, beautiful wall which Mexico never paid for, against the wishes of Congress.

 

Is it the wish of Congress to generously care for the droves of illegal immigrants pouring through the unfinished beautiful wall? 

[Chomper Higgot]

4 minutes ago, Saanim said:

Is it the wish of Congress to generously care for the droves of illegal immigrants pouring through the unfinished beautiful wall? 

But, and it’s a big but, the wall was a failure.

 

Or to be more precise, it was a failure in terms of preventing migrants crossing the border.

 

It was arising success at feeding the rightwing with something to be outraged over and a rather effective means of stripping Trump supporters of their hard earned cash.