Jump to content

Prayut Urged To Leave Unpaid-For House In Army Barracks


Recommended Posts

Posted

Good luck with that one. He’ll probably just say he is still the minister of defense or just ignore the request all together. 

Posted

Having a government paid for house as PM is not that big a deal.  10 downing white house Sussex

Where it will be interesting is after he loses.  How fast will the new regime kick his but to the curb

Posted
19 minutes ago, kingstonkid said:

Having a government paid for house as PM is not that big a deal.  10 downing white house Sussex

Where it will be interesting is after he loses.  How fast will the new regime kick his but to the curb

Did any of the other PM's who were truly elected have Government housing?  Thailand Does not have an official residence except for the person we can never discuss.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Did any of the other PM's who were truly elected have Government housing?  Thailand Does not have an official residence except for the person we can never discuss.

Yes, there is an official PM's residence but it is little used:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phitsanulok_Mansion#:~:text=Phitsanulok Mansion (Thai%3A บ้านพิษณุโลก,government house in Dusit%2C Bangkok.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, nigelforbes said:

One wonders in what condition the place is now, if kept up or just used as a mausoleum.  Well I found the issue:

 

Only two prime ministers, Prem Tinsulanonda and Chuan Leekpai,[1] have taken residence there. Prem moved to another premise after a few days. The house is reportedly haunted.[9][10]

Edited by ThailandRyan
  • Haha 2
Posted

It is all in the selection of endless titles - and Thailand is faring VERY well. General Prayuth, General Prawit, Police Lieutenant Thaksin (alternatively also "fugitive") is referred to a former Prime Minister. All correct (I assume) but relevant is only the PRESENT title and all those "politicians" are no longer Generals or Police top bananas - unless it serves their purpose. 

The unnecessary purchase of three engine-less submarines fares slightly higher than a "misunderstanding" in the allocation of free housing but I might be wrong here too ???? 

Posted
On 1/24/2023 at 8:35 AM, sammieuk1 said:

Eviction is sure to be covered in rule 44 if not the constitutional court can do addons for a fee ????

If you can't pay we'll take it away...:clap2:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...