Jump to content

How pedantic are you ?


Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

You couldn't say to someone "you are pedantic"?

 

You could, but what you would mean is that their actions are pedantic.

 

"You are being pedantic" would be more accurate.

 

"You are a pedant" is directly telling someone what you think they are.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed in your first sentence you wrote: "eg". This should be e.g., then later in the same sentence you wrote: "... doors were locked in the evenings,most guards would ...". There needs to be a space after the comma.

 

As for the rest of your punctuation and grammar I shall leave any further critique for other Asean Now (A.N.) members to offer up.

 

Do I qualify as a pedant? LOL ????????????????????????

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kingstonkid said:
17 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

This is how I would be and if I had to employ security I would want them to do this. ????‍♂️

Part of being in the military was security. As the Security NCO of many a unit, it was my enjoyment to find people like you that did not do the job and hang them.

 

As to insurance I take it that you do not come here very often nor have noticed the number of Brits that are crying the blues because their insurance does not cover what they THOUGHT it did.

 

As to a will, the fact that your lawyer is doing what you are paying him to do should make you happy.  I am sure while you don't GAFF the people that you leave things to will be very thankful.

You seem to have either quoted me by mistake or confused me with the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another conjugation of the word is pedantry - idiomatically, the "splitting of hairs". Possibly arguing a point that does little to change the subject/object of it! For example.

 

"I have 2000 friends on Facebook".

 

Pedant replies, "I happen to know you have only 1998".

 

ie, the pedant makes a point that is not fully denying it but feels the need to refute on the basis of it being incorrect - but in reality of no significance to the original claim that remains valid and unnecessarily requiring correction!

 

I am now being circumloquacious or a perennial sufferer of logorrhea. ( the spellchecker for this word suggested gonorrhea - Ha! ha).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 48

      Do you owe money?

    2. 16

      New PL football season 2024/25 ⚽️

    3. 24

      Former Arsenal Player Arrested Over £600K Cannabis Smuggling from Thailand

    4. 181

      Trump vs. Taylor Swift: A Battle He’s Bound to Lose

    5. 281
    6. 27

      On Poor People & Rushing

    7. 26

      UK frozen pension returning to UK and going overseas again at a later date!

    8. 112

      Stealing a Federal Election

    9. 38

      Will Harris' Leadership Unite or Divide the Nation?

    10. 8

      Barretts Esophagus

    11. 33

      Truth social is the future! Buy now while it's on sale.

    12. 112

      Stealing a Federal Election

    13. 5

      More Than 70,000 Soldiers Fighting for Russia Have Now Been Killed

    14. 48

      Do you owe money?

×
×
  • Create New...
""