Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, Walker88 said:

trump released 5000 Taliban jihadis plus set the timetable for US withdrawal before leaving office. Those released jihadis overthrew what was left of the Afghanistan government and now run the country. It is quite likely7 some of them ordered and carried out the airport bombing during the withdrawal.

 

Quite likely? 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, newnative said:

They're not 'claims', they're facts.  Easily googled.  Just google 'Trump convicted for charity fraud', for example, and up it pops.  Just google 'Trump convicted for sexual assault', and up it pops.  See how easy that is?

 

facts....easily googled...555. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, newnative said:

     Yes, makes it so much harder to fall back on the ridiculously lame 'claim' excuse when confronted with actual facts.  ('Well, that's just  a claim'.  Umm, no it's not, Grasshopper.)  The facts are often so easy to locate with Google.  Google 'Trump convicted of sexual assault' and there are all the facts right there, in only the time it took to type the query.  I sense a lot of grinding teeth.  Grrrrrrr!  Cursed Google with cursed facts.  

 

Try chewing a strip of leather.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Walker88 said:

You obviously have access to that thing called the internet. You can search, and maybe learn something.

Read the rules at the beginning of this subforum. It is YOU that has to provide a link, not us.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, bendejo said:

I also recall what was close to a total pull back from Syria, apparently at Putin's behest. 

And yes, if DT were president at the time there would be no Russia-Ukraine war, he would have stayed half a would away and Putin would have taken it. 

 

Putin is in Syria legally..the US was there illegally...still is.....stealing oil!!

Edited by frank83628
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, xylophone said:

There are many things that can be found on the Internet, and facts are one of them, however if you like to think that "Lizard people secretly run the world and we have proof" then you are obviously the sort of person who Trump likes to have as his supporter (look that up if you wish), AND one generally hopes that intelligent folk can see the difference between facts, backed up by facts and nonsense backed up by nonsense publications.

 

Oh, and "common sense" should be able to sort out the wheat from the chaff, in the main, however I understand that this can be difficult for trumpies.

 

It was a link to Cracked.   I figured the joke would be obvious.  Focus on the joke and forgot this one?  

Trump was right: 'Russian collusion' was a hoax. Good luck regaining public's trust.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/05/17/durham-report-vindicates-trump-fbi-russia-investigation/70222344007/

 

Before the 2020 election, you could scour the interweb all you want and the only place you'd have found this truth is on right wing sites that apparently are not acceptable links here.  The same holds true of the laptop story.  The MSM was all over the Russian collusion story and "debunking" of the laptop.  We're already seeing, and will see more of the same phenomena in the leadup to the 2024 election.

 

Lefties on here have no idea how much easier it is to find links to support even their most wingnut stuff, with 10x as many journalists claiming to be Dems as Repubs.  Stuff like "the border is secure".  And "Repubs are the ones who are letting millions cross the southern border".  And "Biden is fit as a fiddle"

 

 

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 1/25/2024 at 2:38 PM, Thingamabob said:

As a Brit I would hope for anyone other than Biden as president, no matter whether Democrat or Republican. 

As bad as Biden is, it could be worse.  Kamala Harris.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, G_Money said:

As bad as Biden is, it could be worse.  Kamala Harris.

 

That's why even the Repubs are hoping the impeachment goes nowhere.  Biden could be filmed walking across the White House lawn with a decapitated head in one hand and a bloody machete in the other, and they still wouldn't want to replace him with Kamala.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 4
Posted
34 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It was a link to Cracked.   I figured the joke would be obvious.  Focus on the joke and forgot this one?  

Trump was right: 'Russian collusion' was a hoax. Good luck regaining public's trust.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/05/17/durham-report-vindicates-trump-fbi-russia-investigation/70222344007/

 

Before the 2020 election, you could scour the interweb all you want and the only place you'd have found this truth is on right wing sites that apparently are not acceptable links here.  The same holds true of the laptop story.  The MSM was all over the Russian collusion story and "debunking" of the laptop.  We're already seeing, and will see more of the same phenomena in the leadup to the 2024 election.

 

Lefties on here have no idea how much easier it is to find links to support even their most wingnut stuff, with 10x as many journalists claiming to be Dems as Repubs.  Stuff like "the border is secure".  And "Repubs are the ones who are letting millions cross the southern border".  And "Biden is fit as a fiddle"

 

 

 

 

Actually, from reading this opinion piece in USA Today, you'd think Durham was a competent investigator. It's useful to recall that both his major prosecutions failed miserably. To make it worse, the people he prosecuted were not members of the Justice Dept but rather were accused of lying to the Justice Dept. Most legal commentators concurred that the only reason they were pursued was bias on Durham's part. As you probably don't recall, the Inspector General of the Justice Dept previously did an investigation of the FBI investigation. He concluded that bias played no role in the investigation. That there was no conspiracy. When that report was released - even though Durham asked for it not to be  - Durham released a commentary in which he expressed doubts about the results of the I.G.s investigation. As did William Barr. Durham and William Barr, the Attorney General, went to extraordinary lengths to find evidence of a conspiracy in the Justice Dept. They even went to Italy together to try to get information out of the Italian intelligence service. That failed. But they were given allegations that Trump was involved with organized crime. Even though it wasn't in his remit, Barr authorized Durham to investigate instead of a different investigator. When Durham's final report was released, essentially he agreed with the Inspector General's report. There was no deep state conspiracy or any kind of conspiracy behind the FBI investigation.

I see that this author of the article has repeated the falsehood that the investigation was launched the FBI was launched on the basis of the Steele Dossier. Not true.

.

 

In addition, this piece doesn't address the results of the Mueller investigation. Mueller said that if Trump weren't President he would indict him on 10 counts of obstructing justice. Much of that obstruction had to do with the Russia investigation and Trump signaling that he would pardon those whom the Justice Dept investigated, prosecuted and got convicted. And that's exactly what Trump did.

William Barr, who decided not to follow up on the results of the Mueller investigation was soundly castigated by the Federal Judge overseeing the matter. Basically, he called Barr a liar for misrepresenting the results of the investigation.

 

 

Keep in mind that this is an opinion column from a right wing journalist.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

That's why even the Repubs are hoping the impeachment goes nowhere.  Biden could be filmed walking across the White House lawn with a decapitated head in one hand and a bloody machete in the other, and they still wouldn't want to replace him with Kamala.

 

The only Republicans  in office who are hoping the impeachment goes nowhere are those in swing states whose seats will be jeopardized should they vote for impeachment. And those Republicans who understand what it would mean for their those representatives' electoral prospects.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...